I really rate Leanne Payne's teaching on healing, counseling and prayer. Parts I and II of this book indeed have significant insight to share about the nature of God, of humanity and of healing of brokenness in people. It is almost a manual for prayer ministry. She explains spiritual gifts in a fresh new way, she brings home the incarnational presence of Jesus living in us; and well ahead of her time she address the causes and situations of gender confusion, etc. Payne does a great job of dealing with barriers to healing and wholeness as well as ministry itself. A portion of this material deals with the importance of both baptism and communion, but I didn't necessarily appreciate the full relevance of what she is communicating in these?
However Part III is much harder to appreciate. There are hints earlier in the book this is what she want to do, but it seems the point was to tackle two serious problems Payne sees with prayer ministry. The first of these is to attack the idea of substitutionary prayer whereby it is taking upon oneself the affliction of another - which may be done with the most generous, sacrificial of motives, but is wrong because Jesus Himself is the final sacrifice. The second is to attack Jungian psychology's influence in the church as being a gnostic imposition (which she analyses in depth). Prior to launching these attacks the book spends several, it has to be said, fairly obscure chapters to talk about 'true' Christian symbolism or imagery, versus these alternative ones of substitution or gnosticism. It is all a little too tangental.
Another aspect to the book is that is only superficially relevant is Payne's huge regard and dependence on CS Lewis' writing for much of her material. Evidentially Payne once studied academically Lewis in depth and therefore has a truly deep appreciation for his thinking, but a literary analysis isn't really what her own readers are looking for. Nevertheless what she draws out of Lewis is still very valuable and revealing.