The form itself in which Leiris presents his dreams is the most interesting aspect of this work for me. Maurice Blanchot says in the introduction,
"These were once dreams; they are now signs of poetry." (p. xxii)
The poetics of dreams has fascinated me recently. In the past I've seen many structures that have a residue of something that can't be captured in the waking world or in language. It's hard to give someone else your dream and have them understand what makes it so deeply evocative for you- but Leiris can do this somewhat well.
April, 1926
(half-asleep)
A meat tree, each of whose roots bears a beefsteak. One night a year, Jesus Christ appears among these roots to proclaim the Republic. Whereupon the roots turn into an inverted Christmas tree, laden with lights and hams, with Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the Apostles in a halo at its center.
This reads almost like a parable. The imagery builds and build towards its final image and the dream freezes there, leaving us hanging on something who's meaning is indeterminable but which still, in an unidentifiable way, makes sense. Psychoanalysis would likely try to pin some sort of meaning on this dream by analyzing it's constituent elements and the free associations that spring from them towards the residue of past experiences. But Leiris doesn't do this. Sure, he gives us interpretations and points out potential wordplay- but it's never reductionist, because it always ends in a "I guess that could be what it is, but who knows?" Ultimately, what matters for Leiris in the dream are the evocations of new feelings, of a sense which is not a meaning.