What do you think?
Rate this book
طلای خدایان
La mas fantastica vision de nuestro Fue visitada la Tierra por viajeros procedentes del espacio? Los extrate rrestres entre nostros.
First published January 1, 1972
53 people are currently reading
941 people want to read
About the author
Erich von Däniken
323 books893 followersGreek: Έριχ φον Νταίνικεν
Erich Anton Paul von Däniken (1935–2026) was a Swiss author of several pseudoscientific books which made claims about extraterrestrial influences on early human culture, including the best-selling Chariots of the Gods?, published in 1968. Däniken was one of the main figures responsible for popularizing the "paleo-contact" and ancient astronauts hypotheses.
The ideas put forth in his books are rejected by virtually all scientists and academics, who categorize his work as pseudohistory, pseudoarchaeology, and pseudoscience. Early in his career, he was convicted and served time for several counts of fraud or embezzlement, and wrote one of his books in prison.
Erich Anton Paul von Däniken (1935–2026) was a Swiss author of several pseudoscientific books which made claims about extraterrestrial influences on early human culture, including the best-selling Chariots of the Gods?, published in 1968. Däniken was one of the main figures responsible for popularizing the "paleo-contact" and ancient astronauts hypotheses.
The ideas put forth in his books are rejected by virtually all scientists and academics, who categorize his work as pseudohistory, pseudoarchaeology, and pseudoscience. Early in his career, he was convicted and served time for several counts of fraud or embezzlement, and wrote one of his books in prison.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 59 reviews
Read
June 3, 2018کتاب طلای خدایان چهارمین اثر اریک فون دانیکن نویسنده کتابهای نظریات فضانوردی باستانی است که در سال ۱۹۷۲ به چاپ رسید. دانیکن بطور صریح ابراز میکند که: «نوشتن چنین مطالبی نیاز به تهور و شهامت دارد. زیرا این فرضیات با آنچه باستان شناسی تاکنون اظهار داشته سخت تضاد دارد.»
این از ویژگیهای ارایه هر فرضیه نوینی است. هر حرکت تازه ای در عرصه هر رشته از علوم، این دشواری را به دنبال دارد که محقق و دانشمند در معرض “لعنت های علمی” عالمان است. عده ای راه تمسخر می پویند و گروهی آن را “اراجیفی” رها شده از مغز “معلول” نویسنده اش می دانند.
این از ویژگیهای ارایه هر فرضیه نوینی است. هر حرکت تازه ای در عرصه هر رشته از علوم، این دشواری را به دنبال دارد که محقق و دانشمند در معرض “لعنت های علمی” عالمان است. عده ای راه تمسخر می پویند و گروهی آن را “اراجیفی” رها شده از مغز “معلول” نویسنده اش می دانند.
December 13, 2021
This should have been entitled "The Gold of the Gullible," for that is what Mr. von Däniken obtained, including my hoarded pocket money back when I believed.
August 8, 2015
Read some of the comments by "readers" - Hello!!! He wrote this in the seventies and even went to prison for 2 years under highly mysterious circumstances at the time. We've come a long way since and many people have become more open-minded to controversial ideas. Okay, many people are also more closed-minded these days. I'm not fond of the translation errors and meagre answers to questions, but you can't argue away the ancient books he quotes and you can't call him conventional...
December 14, 2020
Another dose of meaningless drivel from Mr. von Daniken.
Honestly, the sad thing is that sometimes he does ask the right questions, and I do agree with him that far more research does need to be done in certain areas. I would also rather live in a world that spent billions on archaeology and research than on the defense industry. But his conclusions are so biased and he is completely and 100% blinded by his own pet hypothesis that he ignores the obvious to shoehorn it into his narrative. And he loves to kick the can down the road without answering the question. He seems to now be on the "Earth was seeded with live from space" idea - except he never seems to question where that life would have come from. This is not an answer, it's just a transfer of an answer back another step. He also seems to completely misinterpret the idea of the Big Bang.
As an example, near the end of the book he shows a hieroglyph of a "bee god" and refuses to see it as that, claiming that it must be an alien astronaut wearing an elaborate headdress with two bombs behind if. Yet, I can clearly see the bee imagery. The "headdress" is of an elongated oval shape, complete with stripes and it ends in a stinger and the the "bombs" angle off to the side like a bee's wings do. Its like looking at a bee from above - which makes sense for a stone carving. One can't really get into perspective and shading and 3d modeling with chisel and stone.
At any rate - this book spends about 30 pages on its main premise - this supposed gold-filled, plastic statue bearing, underground flood bunker, and the rest explaining how ancient myths and legends can't mean anything other than ancient astronauts. And yes, the whole reason ancient people built underground was to create bunkers to survive either a) the biblical flood (which is 100% factual according to von Daniken - and now probably had to do with changes to the Earth's axis the destruction of a supposed fifth planet, where our asteroid belt is now), or b) a catastrophic nuclear war between two separate groups of ancient astronauts (see aforementioned "fifth world destruction").
The man can't even keep his own pet hypothesis straight...
Honestly, the sad thing is that sometimes he does ask the right questions, and I do agree with him that far more research does need to be done in certain areas. I would also rather live in a world that spent billions on archaeology and research than on the defense industry. But his conclusions are so biased and he is completely and 100% blinded by his own pet hypothesis that he ignores the obvious to shoehorn it into his narrative. And he loves to kick the can down the road without answering the question. He seems to now be on the "Earth was seeded with live from space" idea - except he never seems to question where that life would have come from. This is not an answer, it's just a transfer of an answer back another step. He also seems to completely misinterpret the idea of the Big Bang.
As an example, near the end of the book he shows a hieroglyph of a "bee god" and refuses to see it as that, claiming that it must be an alien astronaut wearing an elaborate headdress with two bombs behind if. Yet, I can clearly see the bee imagery. The "headdress" is of an elongated oval shape, complete with stripes and it ends in a stinger and the the "bombs" angle off to the side like a bee's wings do. Its like looking at a bee from above - which makes sense for a stone carving. One can't really get into perspective and shading and 3d modeling with chisel and stone.
At any rate - this book spends about 30 pages on its main premise - this supposed gold-filled, plastic statue bearing, underground flood bunker, and the rest explaining how ancient myths and legends can't mean anything other than ancient astronauts. And yes, the whole reason ancient people built underground was to create bunkers to survive either a) the biblical flood (which is 100% factual according to von Daniken - and now probably had to do with changes to the Earth's axis the destruction of a supposed fifth planet, where our asteroid belt is now), or b) a catastrophic nuclear war between two separate groups of ancient astronauts (see aforementioned "fifth world destruction").
The man can't even keep his own pet hypothesis straight...
May 18, 2015
Danïken raised eyebrows with his first book, 'Chariots of the Gods?', which married a sensational theory with evidence that didn't hold up to the slightest scrutiny. By the time of 'The Gold of the Gods', he'd already served time in jail for fraud (he embezzled money from his employers to fund his research) and was a best selling author derided for his ridiculous conspiracy theories. You know, like Dan Brown.
'Gold' has EVD in an odd position: he's well aware of his critics yet invites further scorn by backing a wilder theory with flimsier evidence. Unlike 'Chariots', the nonsense in which was obscured by a careful ghost-writer, the lies in this one are right there in the text. How can Danïken find a large quantity of plaques in an unknown language in a subterranean labyrinth, yet be unable to photograph any? How can he fail to navigate his way to a library in China due to language barriers, but be capable of reading a book of early Chinese mythology in the same language? And how exactly did his ancient astronauts create life on Earth, a point he all too often skips over? It's strange to think this stuff ever attracted international attention; these days it would be left where it belonged, on a poorly-maintained Wordpress site or a rambling post on Reddit.
'Gold' has EVD in an odd position: he's well aware of his critics yet invites further scorn by backing a wilder theory with flimsier evidence. Unlike 'Chariots', the nonsense in which was obscured by a careful ghost-writer, the lies in this one are right there in the text. How can Danïken find a large quantity of plaques in an unknown language in a subterranean labyrinth, yet be unable to photograph any? How can he fail to navigate his way to a library in China due to language barriers, but be capable of reading a book of early Chinese mythology in the same language? And how exactly did his ancient astronauts create life on Earth, a point he all too often skips over? It's strange to think this stuff ever attracted international attention; these days it would be left where it belonged, on a poorly-maintained Wordpress site or a rambling post on Reddit.
April 5, 2012
Outstanding evidence. I find the most intriguing aspect of these theories that they are quite old. My copy of this book is from 1973. I think we tend to believe that all "sightings" of UFO's come from more recent America and as American's we tend to believe we are the center of the Earth. As such we think that all sightings have happened around Area 51 and only since the advent of hand cameras. The truth is that there is evidence from possible "visitations" since the dawn of time. Long before modern time, heck back when Humans were still on the Stone Age. My brain and eyes can't stop eating this stuff up. Modern Conspiracy Theorists should really check these books out.
May 21, 2015
An interesting yet flawed read. While Daniken raises very interesting questions, the latter parts of this book veer off in to wild speculation that diminish the strength of earlier arguments.
Most of my inspiration for my own writing comes from writers like Daniken who point out the obvious holes in our current understanding of history. I'm seen enough evidence to know that alien life exists but you won't find much of that evidence here. Perhaps it is simply a matter of the book not holding up well with age. More likely it was a case of a publisher pushing the author on to make ever-more audacious claims to help sell books.
Daniken's Chariots of the Gods blew my mind when I first read it 30+ years ago. He is the forefather of an entire genre of books now...many of which are better written than The Gold of the Gods.
Most of my inspiration for my own writing comes from writers like Daniken who point out the obvious holes in our current understanding of history. I'm seen enough evidence to know that alien life exists but you won't find much of that evidence here. Perhaps it is simply a matter of the book not holding up well with age. More likely it was a case of a publisher pushing the author on to make ever-more audacious claims to help sell books.
Daniken's Chariots of the Gods blew my mind when I first read it 30+ years ago. He is the forefather of an entire genre of books now...many of which are better written than The Gold of the Gods.
March 12, 2021
მოკლედ, ვონ დანიკენი ვინც არ იცით ვინ არის გეტყვით, რომ შვეიცარიელი მკვლევარია რომელმაც მთელი ცხოვრება მიუძღვნა უცხოპლანეტელების დედამიწაზე სტუმრობის ფაქტების კვლევას და მათი დამტკიცების მცდელობას. არის დამფუძნებელი არქეოასტრონავტიზმის,რომლის იდეოლოგიის მიხედვით ასეულობით ათასი წლის წინ,ჯერ კიდევ მაშინ როცა ჰომოსაპიენსის არანაირი ნიშნები არ იყო, დედამიწას ეწვივნენ უცხოპლანეტელები, რომლებმაც ჰომინიდების ტვინში შეცვალეს გენი,რამაც სათავე დაუდო ჰომო საპიენსის ჩამოყალიბებას. ჩამოსულმა უცხოპლანეტელებმა ასწავლეს იარაღების დამზადება, დამწერლობა და ა.შ. როდესაც კაცობრიობა ასე თუ ისე განვითარდა, დატოვეს დედამიწა და დაიბარეს რომ ერთ დღესაც დაბრუნდებოდნენ (მეორედ მოსვლა). ხალხმა ისინი ღმერთებად აღიქვა. ანუ ვონ დანიკენის აზრით, ღმერთები რომლებიც ნახსენებია სხვადასხვა რელიგიებში, ნაგულისხმები არიან ის უცხოპლანეტელები, რომლებიც ესტუმრნენ დედამიწას.
ვონ დანიკენს დაწერილი აქვს 20-ზე მეტი წიგნი და განხილული აქვს ალბათ ათასობით საეჭვო ფაქტი თუ მოვლენა რაც მომხდარა ან არსებობს დედამიწაზე. მაგრამ ჩემი გადმოსახედიდან მინუსი ის აქვს,რომ კი არ ვარაუდობს რომელიმე ფაქტი თუ მოვლენა შეიძლება უცხოპლანეტელების მიერ იყოს ჩადენილი, სჯერა რომ ეგ ეგრეა და ემსგავსება იმ ფანატიკოს მორწმუნეს, რომელიც ყველაფერში ღმერთის კვალს ხედავს.
ყველაზე საინტერესო თეორიები რაც აქვს, არის ენოქისა და ეზეკიელის მონათხრობები ბიბლიიდან.
100%-იანი ფაქტი მათი აქ ყოფნის არ აღმოუჩენიათ ჯერ და თვითონ ერთ-ერთ ყველაზე საიმედო ფაქტად მაიას ტომის ქალაქ Palenque-ში აღმოჩენილ ქვაზე ამოტვიფრულ ამ ნახატს მიიჩნევს, რომელზეც იდეაში ასტრონავტი უნდა იყოს გამოსახული:
who knows 🤷
4 წიგნი წავიკითხე ვონ დანიკენის და ვისაც გაინტერესებთ ეს თემატიკა, გირჩევთ წაიკითხოთ The Chariots of the Gods (ეს მართლა კაია, ამან გაუთქვა სახელი) და მოუსმინოთ რამდენიმე ლექციას https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rogtb... . დანარჩენი იმდენად საინტერესოა, რომ ცოტა უინტერესობაში გადადის ერთი და იგივეს მტკიცება.
ვონ დანიკენს დაწერილი აქვს 20-ზე მეტი წიგნი და განხილული აქვს ალბათ ათასობით საეჭვო ფაქტი თუ მოვლენა რაც მომხდარა ან არსებობს დედამიწაზე. მაგრამ ჩემი გადმოსახედიდან მინუსი ის აქვს,რომ კი არ ვარაუდობს რომელიმე ფაქტი თუ მოვლენა შეიძლება უცხოპლანეტელების მიერ იყოს ჩადენილი, სჯერა რომ ეგ ეგრეა და ემსგავსება იმ ფანატიკოს მორწმუნეს, რომელიც ყველაფერში ღმერთის კვალს ხედავს.
ყველაზე საინტერესო თეორიები რაც აქვს, არის ენოქისა და ეზეკიელის მონათხრობები ბიბლიიდან.
100%-იანი ფაქტი მათი აქ ყოფნის არ აღმოუჩენიათ ჯერ და თვითონ ერთ-ერთ ყველაზე საიმედო ფაქტად მაიას ტომის ქალაქ Palenque-ში აღმოჩენილ ქვაზე ამოტვიფრულ ამ ნახატს მიიჩნევს, რომელზეც იდეაში ასტრონავტი უნდა იყოს გამოსახული:
who knows 🤷
4 წიგნი წავიკითხე ვონ დანიკენის და ვისაც გაინტერესებთ ეს თემატიკა, გირჩევთ წაიკითხოთ The Chariots of the Gods (ეს მართლა კაია, ამან გაუთქვა სახელი) და მოუსმინოთ რამდენიმე ლექციას https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rogtb... . დანარჩენი იმდენად საინტერესოა, რომ ცოტა უინტერესობაში გადადის ერთი და იგივეს მტკიცება.
August 14, 2015
Estava a ser uma leitura mais ou menos engraçada até o von Daniken perguntar:
- Se a humanidade evoluiu dos macacos, porque é que continuam a existir macacos?
Não, man. A sério. Não. Para por aí. Uma coisa são teorias do arco da velha sobre placas de ouro escondidas em grutas, outra totalmente diferente são diatribes criacionistas, que conseguem atingir um nível de loucura e estupidez incomensuravelmente maior.
- Se a humanidade evoluiu dos macacos, porque é que continuam a existir macacos?
Não, man. A sério. Não. Para por aí. Uma coisa são teorias do arco da velha sobre placas de ouro escondidas em grutas, outra totalmente diferente são diatribes criacionistas, que conseguem atingir um nível de loucura e estupidez incomensuravelmente maior.
December 4, 2017
Нет, все-таки парадоксография — любимый развлекательный жанр. Поэтому опять не сумел устоять против некоторого развлечения по заполнению лакун в этой целостной картине мироздания по Дэникену. Фантазийный элемент присутствует — до той степени, что за историю с «металлической библиотекой» автору потом пришлось как бы даже извиняться и брать слова обратно, но все равно это не отменяет. Антиклерикальный пафос же у него был силен уже тогда.
January 5, 2010
More on Gods from outer space, how I loved all those theories, such a long time ago......sigh
February 11, 2011
Not as good as chariots but still interesting.
March 4, 2011
I really got a kick out of this guy when I was a kid. Not only were his theories loads of fun, and kind of comically eccentric, but his frenzied enthusiasm was ridiculously charming.
May 6, 2014
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
November 19, 2015
Ancient Aliens are easier to believe than Obama having been reelected. I like these books and Ancient Aliens also.
May 14, 2020
Uhmmm, un libro curioso... Däniken es un exagerador, un charlatán y fué un estafador.... dicho esto, también hay que decir que pone sobre el tapete cuestiones válidas, no resueltas sobre antíguas civilizaciones o pueblos de nuestro planeta.
Hay cosas como los Moai, el hombre de hierro y otros, que ya se han investigado y se han resuelto evidenciando la ausencia de acciones extraterrestres. Quedan otras y está por ver cómo se resuelven en el futuro.
Como dice una buena amiga, hay que quedarse con los datos, con las preguntas, no con sus conclusiones pq este señor, "se viene arriba enseguida"
Por lo demás, ameno y divertido por tramos.
Hay cosas como los Moai, el hombre de hierro y otros, que ya se han investigado y se han resuelto evidenciando la ausencia de acciones extraterrestres. Quedan otras y está por ver cómo se resuelven en el futuro.
Como dice una buena amiga, hay que quedarse con los datos, con las preguntas, no con sus conclusiones pq este señor, "se viene arriba enseguida"
Por lo demás, ameno y divertido por tramos.
December 31, 2023
A ton of heady stuff (gold included!).
Metallic libraries, paradoxical drawings (some of them - etchings on metal), all kinds of weird cutlery - and all of this prepared in the way to suggest otherworldly cultures of the past, ones that somehow got lost through all the ages.
Some of this could even be true, some - the author likely went overboard with all the kilometres of underground secret tunnels built in ancient times and still chockful of ancient gold stuff.
Anywas, this is quite the alternative to fiction.
Metallic libraries, paradoxical drawings (some of them - etchings on metal), all kinds of weird cutlery - and all of this prepared in the way to suggest otherworldly cultures of the past, ones that somehow got lost through all the ages.
Some of this could even be true, some - the author likely went overboard with all the kilometres of underground secret tunnels built in ancient times and still chockful of ancient gold stuff.
Anywas, this is quite the alternative to fiction.
June 27, 2011
...big von Däniken moves include asking nonsensical questions ("Do the circles indicate the number of space travelers buried inside the pyramid?") but not answering them, just making stuff up (you won't believe all the amazing shit he saw but wasn't allowed to take pictures of), and, my favorite, a little something I like to call "Von Däniken Non Sequitur Logic", where one real fact somehow proves a completely unrelated, made-up fact.
Full review here:
http://www.mrsatanism.com/books/goldofthegods.htm
Full review here:
http://www.mrsatanism.com/books/goldofthegods.htm
January 10, 2015
"Probabil că tehnologia ne va permite să intrăm curând în contact cu alte inteligenţe evoluate. Cum ne vom defini când vom fi confruntaţi cu ele? Ce va însemna atunci catolic şi protestant, luteran, husit, mahomedan şi budist, hindus şi israelit? Astea vor fi criterii depăşite. Îi vom prezenta pe semenii noştri ca pe nişte debili pentru că nu vor să răsucească nici măcar un comutator sâmbăta (evreii)? Sau pentru că nu mănâncă carne de porc (musulmanii)? Sau pentru că consideră sacri şobolanii şi vacile slabe (hinduşii). Sau pentru că şi-au bătut în cuie pe cruce Dumnezeul atotputernic?"
August 1, 2017
One of my favorite books by Mr Daniken. I love his books because he is easy to read. It doesn't get bogged up with too much technical stuff. He writes so that everyone can understand what he is saying.
If you want to feel convinced that Aliens were on Earth before us and created us, then read Mr. Daniken's books. He's very thought provoking but he also backs up his claims with a lot of real evidence. Not only in artifacts but also even using the bible!
He's a great writer. He is well worth the read.
This book deals with prehistoric earthly era of the Gods.
If you want to feel convinced that Aliens were on Earth before us and created us, then read Mr. Daniken's books. He's very thought provoking but he also backs up his claims with a lot of real evidence. Not only in artifacts but also even using the bible!
He's a great writer. He is well worth the read.
This book deals with prehistoric earthly era of the Gods.
February 25, 2012
Horrible! Worse than the last one. All he does is ask questions and draw conclusions with no evidence. As one reviewer said, "You wouldn't believe the things he couldn't take pictures of!" While I am willing to consider his hypothesis as valid, I'll defer to other authors (Zacharia Sitchin) who provide realistic explainations and conslusions - even if all of this is nonsense.
August 7, 2021
Another fictional account from Daniken. Daniken himself has admitted that he had fabricated the entire cave adventure in 1978.If you are reading this anytime in this century, read it as a fictional story.
When i know the actual backstory, it is funny to read his spin as a fictional description. Hence, 1 star instead of zero.
When i know the actual backstory, it is funny to read his spin as a fictional description. Hence, 1 star instead of zero.
November 10, 2008
Pure fiction written as if it were a valid scientific theory. Entertaining in its fashion as long as you realize that it is just a collection of fantastical explanations for human events that can be more readily and logically explained by archaeology.
November 26, 2010
This book was a neat book that excited a lot of people in the 70's, including me. Yes, I enjoyed it and it excited my imagination, but I was a kid at the time. The problem I have with it now is it just seems kind of stupid.
December 12, 2021
This sample of lie selling turns out to be boring and insulting reader's intellect, starting right from the first paragraphs. I had expected that it would be all lies, but was curious about the art of lying in it. I found not much of that up to the point where I stopped wasting my time.
February 27, 2013
Follow up to Chariots of the Gods. As a kid I found these quite fascinating, being caught up with the whole "Battlestar Galactica" man came from outer space vibe. But there's more holes than a colander in the arguments. Nice try but no cigar.
June 7, 2007
More fiction from the big Swiss con man of pseudoarchaeology.
July 30, 2011
More of the Chariots Of The Gods stuff... nothing wrong with that necessarily but by the time he wrote this one he had come to believe his own hype a bit too much!
February 7, 2014
A follow-up to Chariots of the Gods. Food for thought.
August 7, 2012
Space alien Gods! Loved it!
Displaying 1 - 30 of 59 reviews