What do you think?
Rate this book
A Concise Compendium of the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of John F. Kennedy
In spite of later additional or contrary evidence for or against "conspiracy", with the information then available to the commission, this presentation is still worth reading for the contemporaneous official view of the assassination.
- GenresHistoryNonfiction
637 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1964
20 people want to read
About the author
Robert John Donovan
23 books4 followersRobert John Donovan was a Washington correspondent, author and presidential historian. Donovan attended Lafayette High School in Buffalo, New York, where he was Captain of the Hocke Herald Tribune after the war and served as a foreign correspondent and Washington Bureau Chief. During the latter period he was President of the White House Correspondents' Association. From the Tribune, he moved to the Los Angeles Times as Washington Bureau Chief and for a short time as Associate Editor in Los Angeles.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
gone-gave-away
August 9, 2025I have only read parts of this one, but it is one of the greatest fiction pieces ever.
A great deal of thought was put into this.
When the strong winds blow, this makes a good doorstop.
A great deal of thought was put into this.
When the strong winds blow, this makes a good doorstop.
January 13, 2020
When I read a well-composed, well-researched conspiracy book, I can believe that conspiracy. I can see believing this Commission line of the lone gunman. I find the weakest argument to me is that the shot that first hit JFK was also the same that hit Connally. First in the Zapruder film we have the gov. looking back toward POTUS, twisted back far and holding in this right hand his hat, all while he supposedly was shot with the same bullet, including into this hat-holding wrist. Connally's own recollection surfaces:
JFK was reacting to the 2nd shot when Connally was turned to the right, so Connally turning to the left was a third show and thus the JFK headshot was a 4th one. But, since the Commission needs a long gunman, they conclude "The weight of the evidence indicates that there were three shots fired." Actually this second reading of the Report still leaves me thinking the case is for four shots.
Also, despite police HQ disorganization,
Gosh that level of mishandling of a subject like this beggars belief.
Conspiracy or none, the period leading right up to Ruby killing Oswald reads like a script for a fast-paced movie. Ruby is constantly on the move, hither and thither running on little sleep, hardly any food and affect by Preludin while emotionally unbalanced by the assassination. He comes across like a man in a fugue state liable to do anything.
The first two thirds of the book, which oddly starts with the conclusion (maybe typical of federal commission reports) feels biased to this true crime reader. Where are all the blind alleys and false clues? Those emerge in the final act, such as the improbable Nov 14 1963 meeting of Bernard Weissman (ostensible head of an anti-JFK ad campaign) with Jack Ruby And JD Tippit at the Carousel Club. Now there is grist for the mill!
Regardless of all, good job Commission on suggesting such assassination be a federal crime and Cabinet-level or NSC attention to protective plans of the overworked Secret Service. I wonder if that hole is filled by Homeland Security, now? Much didn't change it seems since the Commission then said the FBI and CIA needed to be more collaborative (would have been nice before 9/11 to have that worked out) and that we needed really to pay attention to those who still prove to be our most prevalent domestic terrorists:
Governor Connally testified that he recognized the first noise as a rifle shot and the thought immediately crossed his mind that it was an assassination attempt. From his position in the right jump seat immediately in front of the President, he instinctively turned to his right because the shot appeared to come from over his right shoulder. Unable to see the President as he turned to the right, the Governor started to look back over his left shoulder, but he never completed the turn because he felt something strike him in the back.” In his testimony before the Commission, Governor Connally was certain that he was hit by the second shot, which he stated he did not hear.
JFK was reacting to the 2nd shot when Connally was turned to the right, so Connally turning to the left was a third show and thus the JFK headshot was a 4th one. But, since the Commission needs a long gunman, they conclude "The weight of the evidence indicates that there were three shots fired." Actually this second reading of the Report still leaves me thinking the case is for four shots.
Also, despite police HQ disorganization,
Oswald was questioned intermittently for approximately 12 hours between 2:30 p.m., on November 22, and 11 a.m., on November 24. Throughout this interrogation he denied that he had anything to do either with the assassination of President Kennedy or the murder of Patrolman Tippit. Captain Fritz of the homicide and robbery bureau did most of the questioning, but he kept no notes and there were no stenographic or tape recordings.
Gosh that level of mishandling of a subject like this beggars belief.
Conspiracy or none, the period leading right up to Ruby killing Oswald reads like a script for a fast-paced movie. Ruby is constantly on the move, hither and thither running on little sleep, hardly any food and affect by Preludin while emotionally unbalanced by the assassination. He comes across like a man in a fugue state liable to do anything.
The first two thirds of the book, which oddly starts with the conclusion (maybe typical of federal commission reports) feels biased to this true crime reader. Where are all the blind alleys and false clues? Those emerge in the final act, such as the improbable Nov 14 1963 meeting of Bernard Weissman (ostensible head of an anti-JFK ad campaign) with Jack Ruby And JD Tippit at the Carousel Club. Now there is grist for the mill!
Regardless of all, good job Commission on suggesting such assassination be a federal crime and Cabinet-level or NSC attention to protective plans of the overworked Secret Service. I wonder if that hole is filled by Homeland Security, now? Much didn't change it seems since the Commission then said the FBI and CIA needed to be more collaborative (would have been nice before 9/11 to have that worked out) and that we needed really to pay attention to those who still prove to be our most prevalent domestic terrorists:
Subversives, ultrarightists, racists and fascists (a) possessing emotional instability or irrational behavior, (b) who have made threats of bodily harm against officials or employees of Federal, state or local government or officials of a foreign government, (c) who express or have expressed strong or violent anti-U.S. sentiments...
August 8, 2024
THE 600-PAGE SUMMARY OF THE ACTUAL WARREN COMMISSION REPORT
Robert J. Donovan wrote in his Introduction to this 1964 book, "In a sense the report of the Warren Commission closes the incident at Dallas. The pain will never end, but at least we now know perhaps all that we are likely to know about what happened."
The report indicates that "there is very persuasive evidence from the experts to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President's throat also caused Governor Connally's wounds... certain other factors have given rise to some difference of opinion as to this probability but there is no question in... the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository." (Pg. 59-60)
They conclude that "On the basis of the evidence before the Commission it concludes that Oswald acted alone." (Pg. 64) They stated that experts "concluded it was probable that the same bullet passed through the President's neck and then inflicted all the wounds on the Governor." (Pg. 157) They also note that "The consensus among the witnesses at the scene was that three shots were fired. However, some heard only two shots, while others testified that they heard four and perhaps as many as five or six shots." (Pg. 160)
Concerning Oswald's denials of guilt, they wrote, "Since independent evidence revealed that Oswald repeatedly and blatantly lied to the police, the Commission gave little weight to his denials of guilt." (Pg. 245) They discount the possibility that Oswald was a Soviet agent, noting that "The very fact that he defected... is itself persuasive evidence that he was not recruited as an agent prior to his defection." (Pg. 350)
While the Report was in many respects inadequate, it is still "must reading" for anyone studying the JFK assassination.
Robert J. Donovan wrote in his Introduction to this 1964 book, "In a sense the report of the Warren Commission closes the incident at Dallas. The pain will never end, but at least we now know perhaps all that we are likely to know about what happened."
The report indicates that "there is very persuasive evidence from the experts to indicate that the same bullet which pierced the President's throat also caused Governor Connally's wounds... certain other factors have given rise to some difference of opinion as to this probability but there is no question in... the Commission that all the shots which caused the President's and Governor Connally's wounds were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository." (Pg. 59-60)
They conclude that "On the basis of the evidence before the Commission it concludes that Oswald acted alone." (Pg. 64) They stated that experts "concluded it was probable that the same bullet passed through the President's neck and then inflicted all the wounds on the Governor." (Pg. 157) They also note that "The consensus among the witnesses at the scene was that three shots were fired. However, some heard only two shots, while others testified that they heard four and perhaps as many as five or six shots." (Pg. 160)
Concerning Oswald's denials of guilt, they wrote, "Since independent evidence revealed that Oswald repeatedly and blatantly lied to the police, the Commission gave little weight to his denials of guilt." (Pg. 245) They discount the possibility that Oswald was a Soviet agent, noting that "The very fact that he defected... is itself persuasive evidence that he was not recruited as an agent prior to his defection." (Pg. 350)
While the Report was in many respects inadequate, it is still "must reading" for anyone studying the JFK assassination.
July 11, 2010
One of the most blatant lies ever purposely handed to the American public. You cannot read this and not be blown away by its audacious shadiness. Earl Warren and Gerald Ford took part in this, or at least have their names attributed to it. Both went on to better greatness, but one has to wonder what exactly they were up to here. And why.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews