How the Right hate the Left using their tactics
18 November 2011
Some people might wonder why, when I'm writing a review on a book, I generally discuss the underlying themes of the book rather than actually writing a review and commenting on grammar, structure, plot, and characters. Well, when we are dealing with non-fiction books, such as this one, plot and characters do not play a huge role, and with regards to grammar and structure I suspect (or rather hope) that all of the problems are ironed out in the editorial stage. Okay, I'm not an editor, and I have only edited a couple of books for friends, but I generally deal with those issues at this stage and not after. Thus, when I pick up a book and read it, it is generally the underlying themes that interest me.
Now, the next question that you're are probably asking is what has the above paragraph to do this this particular book? Absolutely nothing whatsoever. However, I have (and will continue to) develop the themes through many of the other similar books that I have read on the topic of the abuse of corporate power. I will mention it for this book as well, and also comment on a book itself, but I am also attempting to set the context of where I am coming from with a lot of my reviews (if one is to call them as such). Now, one of the guys at my work (actually the boss) suggested that I should start a blog because I seem to have a lot of strange ideas. My response to that is, 'that is what Facebook is for'. Okay, not everybody is on Facebook, and others have fled Facebook due to its addictive nature, but to me, it is a blog that I can use without having to set up my own website, and since I allow pretty much everybody to access my account (which is why I keep all of my personal and identifying details hidden) I see no reason why I should put the extra work into creating my own webpage (and Goodreads is also pretty good for these blogs as well).
Anyway, this book is a book that was written to accompany Michael Moore's first TV series, Adventures in a TV Nation. This only went one season and then became The Awful Truth, which lasted a further two seasons, at which time Michael Moore canceled it and went on to produce movies. Now, Michael Moore is credited (and rightly so) for making documentaries interesting, and he did this with Bowling of Columbine. There is a lot of criticism of Moore's approach, and how he has used film to manipulate the truth to create his documentaries. All I can say to that is that this is a pretty clear case of the pot calling the kettle black. What they are saying is that it is fine for corporate America to use the media to peddle their propaganda to the unsuspecting population, but nobody is allowed to use the same tactics to peddle an opposing point of view.
Okay, it appears that Michael Moore does not like criticism being leveled against him, and he is also accused of hypocrisy and greed, but it is interesting that these accusations are leveled against him by the very people that he is attempting to expose. It is as if by saying that the messenger is bad, then the message that he is propagating is bad, but then this is being said by people who are responsible for poor safety standards which result in the death of workers, and then refuse to cough up compensation for the workers' families who are entitled to be compensated.
However, this is the United States (and scarily enough we see it happening here in Australia as well). I'll use one recent event as an example and that is bringing in pre-commitment technology for poker machines. Now, poker machines are a Pandora's box. There was a time when you could not find any poker machines in Australia, and then bit by bit they were allowed into the casinos and were then allowed into the pubs and clubs. What this has created is an industry where people sit in front of them all day, pour their money into the machines, and end up destroying lives and families. However poker machines are big money for pubs and clubs (and all you have to do is look at my local to see that there are only two parts of the pub that seems to make money – the bottle shop and the poker machines) so pre-commitment technology is a threat to their profits, and thus they start a fear campaign (based upon misleading information) as to how this new technology will destroy the pub culture in Australia. This, to be honest, is rubbish. Sure, there are a number of pubs and clubs that simply scrape by on earnings from poker machines, but this does not justify the fact that families and lives are destroyed by them. Further, the original (and it is still the case now) plan was that only 'high roller' poker machines (that is ones where the minimum bet is five dollars) that will be subject to the ban. However, the clubs and pubs conveniently leave out this information.
As for the book, yeah, well, it was okay. Some of it was amusing, but actually watching the series (which I have not had the opportunity to do so) would be a lot more entertaining than simply reading a book about how the series was made.