The King's Arrow is based on a real-life mystery involving King William II's death during the early twelfth century. The story is told from two perspectives, eighteen-year old Simon's and the king's marshal, Roland's.
The book isn't bad, it's just written in much detail rather than dialogue, so we don't really get to know the characters well. The characters, to me, seemed to be there and not there at the same time. Simon, for example, is an enigmatic figure, who I really don't care about knowing more about. He is basically void of emotion since the death of William kept him from expressing anything. Anyway, after brief analysis of his character, and what I could deduce from the information the author has put, Simon is chivalrous, but at the same time vain, like really vain. He's a minor lord who's seeking to play a bigger role in the kingdom.
Roland, the king's marshal, is an aggressive, stupid and temperamental player, but at the same time is loyal to the king. Too loyal. From what I understood from one incident mentioned, he's all-too-willing to pay to get laid. And the girls are all-too-willing to oblige.
Hmm...makes one think that he's ugly, but then the author describes him as "handsome".
O-kay...
The author's writing style is beautiful...and confusing. So confusing, actually, that I would read pages without comprehending the events unfolding in the book. But then I'd read on a little and it is explained. Even the characters were abundant with not much known about them, except quick little snippets of their dispositions.
The plot, too, was interesting. I love historical fiction. What makes the story greater is the author's theory on what happened that exciting day in New Forest, England. It was, though, a bit fast--not the pacing, but the events. It was like, one moment they were all hunting a stag, and the next, Simon was all googly eyes for Walter's sissy.
The story would most likely bore most of you. So unless you're really intrigued and can handle confusion and details, read it.