While I didn't enthuse over this book to the degree that the person who recommended it to me (and gave me a copy for Christmas!) did, I still liked it reasonably well as entertainment. Hudson does some things well here, and illustrates some of the potential strengths of Christian political fiction --while also illustrating some of the lamentable weaknesses that too often tend to bedevil the existing examples of it.
Set in the near future (from a 1995 perspective), this novel's central figure is William Harrison, a liberal Democrat in the Southern progressive tradition, who at its outset has been President for a few months. As noted above, he entered office as a conventionally secular nonbeliever; but early in the book, he experiences a genuine conversion to Christianity. Harrison is drawn as a three-dimensional, realistic and fully understandable middle-aged male, as human as the rest of us despite his high office; his conversion is handled in a plausible and natural fashion, and wouldn't differ much from that of a schoolteacher or a dentist with a similar psychological makeup. Given his position, though, the application of the new ethical and social understandings his developing faith brings him presents special challenges, and gives Hudson ample scope for bringing out what he sees as the social and political implications of Christianity for our day. He fleshes these out with other plotlines involving a variety of other characters in (and out) of the government or media, including Harrison's siblings, who differ in their relation to Christianity. (One is a naval officer, as was Hudson at one time; the author usually uses that background to good advantage --though I have my doubts whether the military still uses Gatling guns.) Among the issues explored are church-State relations, sexuality (hetero and homo) and how public policy relates to it, women's roles, Middle East policy, etc.
Most of Hudson's characters are fully drawn, believable figures, and to his credit, he generally doesn't demonize the ones who disagree with his positions or embrace lifestyles he doesn't share; they come across as just people who have different attitudes on some things, not as monsters, and he often gives them some good qualities. Political and philosophical debates usually arise naturally and smoothly from the events of the plot, and fit in well. The character's interactions tend to be well done, and the prose flows smoothly. In many ways, the author's messages are on target and timely, particularly in his handling of sexual issues, and his masterful depiction of the utter ideological bias of the mainstream TV news media.
There are significant flaws here, though. Hudson presents a case for a view of the U.S. founding and Constitution (which is actually the position of an extremely tiny minority of U.S. Christians), that holds that civil government should be essentially a Christian theocracy, and that the U.S. government's legal and constitutional basis is in fact historically set up that way. (Despite the quotes from early U.S. political figures that preface each chapter, though, he does not succeed in convincingly making that case.) His Moslem characters tend to be an exception to his usual pattern; they're one-dimensional and wholly evil, and the nuculear terrorism plotline built around them is handled rather melodramatically. (Also, the reference to one of them praying to "the Moslem god" is jarring, to anyone who knows anything about Islam. Hudson would no doubt say that Moslems don't believe in the true God, since they aren't Trinitarians --but do Jews pray to "the Jewish god?") A lot of the profound complexity of political problems, both in the Middle East and domestically, tends to get drastically glossed over here; and some obvious areas of Christian social concern, such as environmental stewardship and economic justice, don't make much appearance. The author's underlying attitudes seem to be somewhat sexist, though the talents and contributions of some of his female characters militate against those attitudes (another example of "trust the tale, and not the teller" :-)). Finally, he has a view of the U.S. political scene that can only be characterized as naive and unrealistic --NO Democratic (and probably no Republican) President who ever seriously declared an intention to apply traditional Christian principles to public life would get the support of a fraction of his/her Cabinet and Congressional party, let alone about half of it; and it would take vastly more than this to bring about the kind of massive political realignment he depicts.
So, all in all, this was a book I liked as well as I could, for its merits. But it's very far from being THE definitive modern Christian political novel that it could have been in more insightful hands.