Robert Swan is a man without peer...he is the only man that has ever walked to both the north and south poles, though in his own words he says that it is more accurate to say that he is "the only person stupid enough to have walked to both poles."
"Antarctica 2041" is the telling of how Swan became obsessed (is that too strong a word?...um...no) with the Antarctic as he grew up in Great Britain on the tales of Scott's polar explorations and adventures, and how that obsession led to a promises that he made to himself and to Antarctia - yes, to a continent - that he would do all he could to protect it.
Swan's telling of his early days, adventuring in Africa as a young man, and the efforts he had to make to complete his walk to the south pole are downright engrossing. While this was not the book I thought it would be when I picked up a copy, it turned out to be a great read. I was expecting a much stronger environmental message than the book contains, and less autobiographical storyline than it contains. As it turns out the book is a mix of probably probably 75% autobiography and 25% environmentalism. The stories are engaging, the writing is entertaining, and the experiences Swan recounts are amazing.
I was not aware of the significance of the year 2041 for Antarctica - but thnaks to Swan's work now I do.
Be advised, Swan is not a scientist, he is an adventurer-crusader-activist. He began his adult life seeking after adventures in an effort to follow in Scott's footsteps, and he eventually found purpose in through his adventures. He raises funds to carry on adventuring in the name of environmental activism, and crusades in that cause the only way he knows how...by adventuring and lecturing. I don't say that this is bad, just that Swan is not your typical environmental activist.
As I mentioned before, Swan is not a scientist. And because that is the case I take issue with only one thing in this book (that stems from his lack of scientific training). He stated that some people view global climate change as "just a theory." What he should have said was that some people view global climate change as only a vague possibility or unsubstantiated notion. Global Climate Change is most definitely in the realm of scientific theory - that is, an idea that has been and continues to be thoroughly researched, and, based on that research, the scientific community has clearly concluded that global climate change is occurring.
And, for those who are not trained in the sciences, the best way to intepret something that is referred to by scientists as a scientific theory is this: scientific theory = scientific fact. And something that is only an unsupported or untested scientific idea should be called a hypothesis (a much weaker statement than a theory).
OK, back to Swan...thanks for the look into what's happening at the poles! Thanks for the good work! Carry on!