An enlightening, celebratory anthology of the most classic and enduring of forms edited by two major poets. This illuminating anthology follows the sonnet through its various moments and makers over five and a half centuries. Edward Hirsch and Eavan Boland, two of our foremost poets, focus on vicissitudes, paying particular attention to how individual poets―from Shakespeare to Strand―have claimed these fourteen lines: lengthened them, shortened them, elaborated on them, and, in turn, been defined by them. Three sections―"The Sonnet in the Mirror," "The Sonnet Goes to Different Lengths," and "The Sonnet extraordinary durability and its reinventions. The collection opens with personal introductions by the editors, and, in the appendix, they provide "Ten Questions for a Sonnet Workshop" to jump-start a conversation between students and teachers. With more than three hundred poems, The Making of a Sonnet guides readers through a vigorous adventures in craft and practice, right up to its extraordinary resurgence in contemporary poetry.
Born in Dublin in 1944, Eavan Boland studied in Ireland, London and New York. Her first book was published in 1967. She taught at Trinity College, University College Dublin, Bowdoin College, the University of Iowa, and Stanford University. A pioneering figure in Irish poetry, Boland's works include The Journey and other poems (1987), Night Feed (1994), The Lost Land (1998) and Code (2001). Her poems and essays appeared in magazines such as The New Yorker, The Atlantic, Kenyon Review and American Poetry Review. She was a regular reviewer for the Irish Times. She was married to the novelist Kevin Casey.
The title is a bit deceptive as this is primarily an anthology, but from an anthology you really couldn't ask for more. It covers the evolution of the sonnet century by century, beginning with the 16th. It of course includes all the biggies (Shakespeare, Hopkins, Millay, etc.), but the 20th century especially is riddled with poets unknown or only barely known to me. Here's one:
from Mystery Train David Wojhan
1. Homage: Light From the Hall
It is Soul Brother Number One, James Brown, Chanting, "It wouldn't be nothing, Noth-iiiinnnnnggg...." Dismembering the notes until everything hangs On his mystical half-screech, notes skidding 'round Your brain as you listen, rapt, thirteen, Transistor and its single earphone tucked With you beneath the midnight covers, station WKED, Big Daddy Armand, The Ragin' Cajun, "Spinning the bossest platters for you all," Golden age trance, when New Orleans stations Traveling two thousand miles shaped distance Into alchemy. Beneath the door, a light from the hall Bathing the bedroom in its stammering glow: Cooke and Redding risen, James Brown quaking the Apollo.
And another (and older) just because...
Sonnet 30 Edmund Spenser
My love is lyke to yse, and I to fyre; How comes it then that this her cold so great Is not dissolved through my so hot desyre. But harder growes the more I her intreat? Or how comes it that my exceeding heat Is not delayd by her hart frosen cold: But that I burne much more in boyling sweat, And feele my flames augmented manifold? What more miraculous thing may be told, That fire which all things melts, should harden yse: And yse which is congeald with sencelesse cold, Should kindle fyre by wonderful devyse? Such is the powre of love in gentle mind, That it can alter all the course of kynd.
An excellent collection, organized by century. Extraordinary to see the ways in which the form developed over time, and also the unique approach of each poet within the same strict form. Lovely.
Here's a sample:
The Illiterate - by George Meredith
Touching your goodness, I am like a man Who turns a letter over in his hand And you might think this was because the hand Was unfamiliar, but, truth is, the man Has never had a letter from anyone; And now he is both afraid of what it means And ashamed because he has no other means To find out what it says than to ask someone. His Uncle could have left the farm to him, Or his parents died before he sent them word, Or the dark girl changed and want him for beloved. Afraid and letter-proud, he keeps it with him. What would you call his feeling for the words That keep him rich and orphaned and beloved?
106) Death Be Not Proud - John Donne 106) Batter My Heart - " " 143) Grasshopper and the Cricket - Leigh Hunt 155) Half My Life is Gone - Longfellow 155) The Sheaves - " " 189) The Silken Tent - Frost 190) Never Again - " " 213) View - Phyllis McGinley 232) The Illiterate - William Meredith 237) The Snow Weed - Howard Moss 238) Jacob's Ladder - Donald Davie 239) Death By Drowning - Elizabeth Brewster 242) Mrs. Snow - Donald Justice 251) Llanto - Philip Levine 258) Conversation Among the Ruins - Sylvia Plath 264) Poetic - K. Fields 267) Sonnet - Robert Pinsky 300) Sonnet - Michelangelo 305) Wreath - George Herbert 332) American Sonnet - Billy Collins 344) I Find No Peace - Petrarch 344) My Lady - Michelangelo 351) Night Scene - Paul Verlaine 360) Sonnet - Phillippe Jaccottet
For all purposes this is probably one of the largest collections of sonnets, many of them devoted to modern sonnets as opposed to ones from different languages or different eras. I recommend the Art of The Sonnet by Stephen Burt as a substitute-the selection isnt as extensive, but the choices are much better with regards to quality and conceit, whereas the choices from this anthology seem much more random and not as carefully thought out.
A Norton Anthology in all the best and worst ways. If you go by the number of pages devoted to the various incarnations of the sonnet in this anthology, you'd come to the conclusion that the 20th century English language sonnet is the highpoint in the history of the form with some minor attention given to international sonneteers such as Neruda or Rilke. The layout of the book was also problematic as you are given a detailed breakdown of sonnet mechanics at the very end of the volume, if the breakdown was at the start of the anthology I would have a better appreciation for the intent of the poems outside of my normal aesthetics.
Dry, perfunctory. This volume calls out the requisite list of classics for their particular merits. Another canonical compendium from Norton, and little substantive material included re: the composition of sonnets themselves.
A fantastic collection of sonnets and commentaries which charted the history and development of one of my favourite poetic forms. It has kickstarted me reading poets I hadn't come across as well as revisiting old favourites.
Discovered many great sonnets, as well as many bad ones. I felt that too much importance was given to the 20th century, whereas other eras were sadly neglected. The curation could have been better, too.
A well-chosen anthology of sonnets spanning centuries and continents. I was hoping for a bit more substance from the introductory essays, but the anthology is obviously the point of the volume.
Read this for Rattle's upcoming Sonnet issue. Started reading a few other anthologies at the library, but this seemed to show the most stylistic diversity.
And it did, among the poems. The sonnet's evolution is traced through the centuries, with broad chapters for each, and extra chapters for variable-length and international sonnets, and sonnets about sonnets. The range is impressive, and enough alone to justify owning a copy.
I found the prose commentary to be annoyingly simplistic and hyper-cheerful. Each chapter starts off with a two or three page introduction, but all of them seemed to repeat the mantra: "Wow, a sonnet can do anything! You can write a sonnet about last night's dinner if you want to! Sonnets are super-flexible!" Boland and Hirsch seem not to realize that the same flexibility applies to every style of poem ever written. And every short story and novel and painting and song and sculpture... When you're an artist, you can do whatever you want. The authors treat that fact like a revelation.
From a big book entitled, THE MAKING OF A SONNET, I was hoping for three things: 1) a literary history of the sonnet, 2) discussion about how sonnets are crafted, the pitfalls and potentialities, and 3) lots of good examples. But here, the history is relegated to sparse generalities, and the processes of composition (the "making") isn't even addressed. What we're left with is a very good anthology of sonnets, but nothing more.
Nearly exhaustive in terms of poets represented, this anthology is a remarkable follow up to Norton's The Making of a Poem. My favorite aspect here is the organization: for the most part the chapters progress chronologically, starting with the 16th century and continuing to the 20th. However, it begins with a chapter called "The Sonnet in the Mirror," a chapter dedicated to sonnets about sonnets and sonnet-making. I really enjoyed reading how poets through the ages have grappled with the form. The ending chapters, as well, are interesting: after the 20th century, there are the chapters "The Sonnet Goes to Different Lengths," "The Sonnet Around the World," and "The Sonnet Under the Lamp: A History of Comment on a Form." This is a massive book and worth putting on any shelf.
My favorite section was the one on how sonnets move away and toward 14 lines/iambic pentameter...The selections here are beautifully chosen, including one of the most exquisite of Bishop's poems, "Sonnet" with its skinny shape suggesting a level or a compass needle, and also the wonderful, wounding "Sonnet for Joe," by Sandra McPherson. That poem is a touchstone for me--Write to Contend. The only way this section and this book could have been improved is by including Sherman Alexie's "Tattoo Tears," which is one of the best sonnets (and poems) I've read in a long, long time.
Considering how many great poems this volume includes, it probably deserves a higher rating. I personally would have liked more in-depth material on the structure, evolution and history of the sonnet, though. Also, it left out most of my favorite examples, but that is obviously very subjective. So three stars it is. I didn't read every single poem, so I think I will come back to this in the future, as there is still a lot to mine.
I am rereading this as I participate in Month of Poetry. I am finding it more interesting as an accompaniment to practice than I did when I just read it. As other reviewers have said, much of the commentary is fairly bland.
Because of the title I rather expected there might be some examples of drafting processes of sonnets. I was disappointed.
My favourite chapter is "The Sonnet Goes to Different Lengths', looking at the way practitioners have deconstructed and reconstructed the form.
This book traces the history of the sonnet through examples spanning over five centuries. The book focuses on breadth of authors represented, heavily weighted in the twentieth century. While the "traditional" sonnets of the modern era may seem ineffective compared to the superb works of Shakespeare, Milton, Donne, etc. in this volume, the later sections on the new types of sonnets gives some hope that the form will keep going.
I read most of the sonnets here, which was my purpose after reading the century updates. Unfortunately, it's too heavy with weaker 20th century sonnets. And the authors' occasional attempts to shoehorn something into the sonnet form (a faux sonnet?) started to grate.
Still, the brief introductions to each century gave me food for thought, and helped to give me an overall picture of the growth of the sonnet form over the centuries.
I am not often a big poetry fan, but I have read almost all this anthology and enjoyed it immensely. I found there something in the sonnet that communicates and I also found the variety of subjects and authors kept me interested.
Personally, I haven't read a lot of sonnets, but this anthology has such a wide array of them and I found many favorites amongst the collection. For a class required anthology, this one was pretty solid. I'd definitely come back to this for personal inspiration.