Once again, my trust has been eroded by someone using literature incorrectly. In the beginning of chapter eight, so near the end, Novak claims that the first sentence of Walden is "I went to the woods...." Tell me you haven't really read the book you're quoting without telling me you haven't read the book you're quoting. Clearly, she has, at most, read an excerpt and then not even registered that she's only read an excerpt. Because I am a nerd and also because I am an expert BS detector due to having had many opportunities to practice, I pulled out my copy of Walden and found the quote in the middle of chapter two. Fine. So that error is neither here nor there. Moving on. Then, in the conclusion she misrepresents The Alchemist, which I happened to be reading concurrently with this book. Ethos destroyed.
More relevantly, I agree with the philosophy of this book. That said, I read it as part of a committee on blended learning, and this book did not seem like a great fit for that task. It focuses much more on a mindset that could/should be in any classroom. It doesn't deal at all with the elements of allowing students to be in alternate spaces and how to deal with the logistics of that part of blended learning. Blended Learning In Action would have been a better choice.