The Autism Industrial Complex by Alicia A. Broderick is an ambitious and deeply critical examination of how autism has been shaped, commodified, and controlled under capitalism. The book takes a hard look at how medical, educational, and philanthropic institutions have turned autism into an industry, driven by profit rather than genuine support for autistic individuals. While the core argument is compelling and thought-provoking, the book’s academic density and one-sided critique make it a challenging and sometimes frustrating read.
Broderick structures her analysis into four sections, each detailing a different stage in the evolution of what she calls the Autism Industrial Complex (AIC). She argues that autism has been framed as a ‘problem’ to be managed, leading to an expanding industry of interventions, therapies, and corporate interests.
The book begins by exploring how autism became a defined category and how behavioral interventions like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) became dominant. Broderick critiques ABA as a method of enforcing compliance rather than fostering genuine support for autistic individuals. She writes: "ABA functions as an ideological apparatus that transforms autistic people into compliant subjects through behavioral correction" (p. 27).
Her argument here is strong, but at times she presents autism’s historical framing in a deterministic way, making it seem as though all autism research and intervention have been entirely driven by capitalism. This overlooks some of the genuine efforts by researchers and practitioners who have worked to improve understanding and support for autistic individuals.
Broderick’s sharpest critiques come in this section, where she examines how organizations like Autism Speaks have shifted the public discourse on autism from one of crisis to one of ‘hope,’ while still operating within an economic framework. She argues: "Hope, within the AIC, is not about genuine inclusion but about the marketability of autistic individuals who conform" (p. 75).
While this section offers insightful critiques, it sometimes lacks balance. While the commercialization of autism is undeniable, Broderick does not sufficiently acknowledge how increased awareness and advocacy—despite corporate influence—have also led to positive changes in societal attitudes toward autism.
The third section is the most technical, delving into the financial and legal structures that maintain the AIC. Broderick argues that autism-related legislation has helped consolidate corporate monopolies rather than truly increasing access to care. "Legislation does not disrupt the AIC but rather consolidates its hold over the autism marketplace" (p. 131).
While this is an important discussion, the heavy use of theoretical language and complex economic critique makes this section difficult to engage with. At times, it feels like the book is more interested in dismantling the system than in proposing meaningful alternatives.
In the final section, Broderick calls for a radical rethinking of autism advocacy, arguing that autistic individuals must be freed from the constraints of the AIC. She challenges readers to envision a future where autism is not treated as a marketable condition but as a legitimate form of neurological diversity. "The true liberation of autistic people lies beyond the neoliberal structures that seek to contain them" (p. 269).
This is an important and necessary call to action, but the book does not offer much in terms of practical solutions. While Broderick is effective in tearing down existing structures, she provides little guidance on how change might actually be implemented.
The Autism Industrial Complex is a valuable and necessary critique of the way autism has been shaped by economic and ideological forces. Broderick presents a compelling argument about the commodification of autism and the corporate interests that sustain it. However, the book’s dense academic style, one-sided argumentation, and lack of practical solutions make it difficult to fully embrace.
For readers interested in autism advocacy and critical theory, this book offers a lot to think about. However, it may not be the best choice for those looking for a balanced or accessible discussion. 3 stars.