Let's start with a few tidbits:
"And so if you know 2+2=4, one way you can express your knowing is by writing it. Another way you can express your knowing is by discussing it. A third way is by creating a model that shows it. A fourth way is by illustrating it and a fifth way is by performing a play. But in too many schools, only one way is considered legitimate. So if you write it, you get an A and that's it. There might be 100 kids in the school who know 2+2=4, but if only two of those kids can write it, then only two of those kids will receive As. That is profoundly discriminatory" (ASCD).
"There is no achievement gap: teachers are just measuring the wrong things by asking minorities to demonstrate competencies like the ability to add. Any time schools teach minority children skills required of productive members of society, they 'serve to indoctrinate minorities into the dominant culture so they can further serve the reproduction of their current roles in society through entering the workforce' the document underlying NY State's official education policy says" (120).
Trillions of dollars have been spent to improve educational outcomes and so far, nothing has worked. Any educators' conference now focuses on social justice and DIRE (diversity, inclusion, race and equity) ideology (729 mentions at the AERA Conference), while reading and accountability receive 115 mentions (124).
Even if you send your own children to charter or private schools (which aren't much better and are sometimes far worse, I can confidently affirm through over 20 years of experience and touring well over 100), "When they grow up, they will live among those people [who did attend public schools], vote with them, and--given the academic results of today's public schools--likely be forced to financially support many of them" (257). The author's expressed intent was to focus on the imperative of paying close attention to local politics and school board meetings. There is far more going on at the local level that will directly affect you.
What to watch for:
• Find out who is really behind what appear to be grassroots efforts but are really "astroturf" screens for established and well-organized political groups and organizations that deliberately seek to camouflage their support.
• Follow the money and ask cui bono? Taxpayer money should not be used to lobby. What real estate developers will benefit from redistricting public schools? Who stands to benefit financially from consulting? Do not trust an institution on the basis of name recognition or prestige. The University of Southern California has outsized influence to truly change the purpose of education to activism, distorts data and issues pseudo-academic papers that become the basis for legislation and policy.
• Consider whether the school is promoting as the purpose of education the free exchange of ideas to increase knowledge and understanding, the use of evidence for reasoned debate, and respect for viewpoint diversity or indoctrination in the DIRE (diversity, inclusion, race and equity) ideology hostile to reason, falsification, disconfirmation, and disagreement of any kind--even dismissing staff who don't "buy in."
• Consider whether the school is communicating more about "the joy of reading, of learning, of independent thinking, of curiosity, of discovering math and science" (67) or the emotionally manipulative triggers of DIRE terms like the baseless concept of "implicit bias." Consider how terms like "unequal outcomes" are being used to manipulate. What is the rationale for centering race? Why is this ideology being promulgated and enforced with an iron fist? Are higher test scores the priority or equally low ones? The easiest and surest way to guarantee equal outcomes is to bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
• Consider that different academic, financial, or other outcomes or representation between Blacks and White do not necessarily indicate racism, discrimination, or "culturally insensitive teaching practices." The American Time Use Survey indicates the hours of homework performed by each of the usual groupings: Asians: 2, White: <1, Hispanics a bit less, Blacks nearly 1/2 hour. Brookings found that they spent the time on leisure activities. Asians spend 4x as much time on their homework compared to other groups. Don't we want to teach the correlation between work and success? Many race hucksters justify their exorbitant fees by creating problems. Some even state that the emphasis on getting the correct answer, perfectionism, punctuality, etc. are all marks of white culture. Hence, authentic anti-racist practice will not
use
hip hop to teach mathematics, because that only "serve to indoctrinate minorities into the dominant culture" (170). Instead, it will teach hip hop for its cultural value to the exclusion of mathematics, an inherently racist field.
• Find out if the school board enforces and supports or ignores the results of surveys of the population, and who is in control of the surveys and view them. (I worked for organizations that deliberately misrepresented the survey results). Boards of all kinds often function as personal fiefdoms and means of compensating for dissatisfactions of all kinds. Bullying of members is common.
• Critically attend to what the numbers and statistics mean. Lies, damn lies and statistics. If the graduation rate has improved dramatically, what are the other possible explanations beyond those presented?
In my district in Florida, teachers actually earn more for awarding more As and Bs; it sound incredible, but I checked it; it's a fact. It increases the graduation rate.
Were students' evaluation procedures changed to less objective measures or an analog of Standards-Based Assessment, (in which what was an F is now a C+)? Was the standardized exit/entrance exam eliminated? In many, many districts across the USA, parents complain that their students earn As but do not pass the standardized assessment; some say their kids "is just bad at test taking." Nonsense. In every other country, in the interest of fairness, a single sitting at a standardized test determines students' future. Only in the USA is this perceived as unfair. Poor Asians outscore the wealthiest of other groups.
• Critically examine the claims, methodology and conclusions of any study that is presented. Even peer-reviewed studies that are the basis of state and federal education policies have jaw-dropping errors in both methodology and analysis.
• Understand that mergers and centralization of municipalities and suburbs makes larger areas easier to control (Los Angeles County, 1 vs. Pittsburgh, 130).
• Question the petition for more money "to improve performance." Enormous expenditures of billions in places like D.C. and Baltimore have actually resulted in diminished academic performance.
Not from Rosiak, but apropos and worthwhile:
Keep in mind at all times the work of Dr. Edwin Friedman, who wrote that effective leadership will be prevented when organizations (even families), "allow the most dependent, most easily hurt members of any organization to effectively ‘set the agenda’…and promote an attitude of adaptation toward immaturity rather than one of responsibility, effectively shifting power to the recalcitrant, the complainers, the passive-aggressive, and the most anxious members of an institution rather than the energetic, the visionary, the imaginative, and the most creatively motivated.
The invasive and destructive nature of these toxic forces is like a cancer or un-self-regulating pathogen, asserts Friedman, and as such, can only be dealt with by taking a stand, i.e. limiting “a toxic agent’s invasiveness” and not through “reasonableness, love, insight, role modeling,…and striving for consensus.”
Alas, taking a stand is the least common way of dealing with such members in our schools, and when a leader does so, stakeholders, often including trustees, tend to reactively sabotage. It is easier to join with others who are similarly anxious to displace blame, seek quick fixes, gather more information (e.g. hire a consultant), escalate victimization and indulge in emotion rather than take responsibility. These “counterrevolutionary characteristics” reinforce the stagnation in our schools.
Schools are on what Friedman describes as a treadmill, holding fast to the notion that all would be well…if we only cede territory to these invasive carcinogens and give them what they want. This is a grave error. Instead, stand up to them and say clearly, "NO."
The enormous surprise in this book is the power and reach of the foundation/NGO-ocracy. If you haven't given much thought before to this particular subtype of kleptocracy, you will once you reach chapter 11, continuing through the rest of the book. In the 1950s(!), Congress set out "'to investigate tax-exempt foundations and comparable organizations,' noting that because foundations and their donors received massive tax breaks, the government was in effect subsidizing them. The peril of the Ford Foundation using American society as its plaything is that 'its errors can be huge errors, gigantic in impact," said Rene A. Wormser in 1958....'A more tight and monopolistic control of great wealth....unchecked by the people...influence our society very materially'" (180). They have guidebooks and use Saul Alinksy's Rules for Radicals to train people to take over school boards and exercise influence on local levels. "These rogue foundations are perhaps the most radical, powerful, and least understood force in American politics. And their aspirations go far beyond the outcome of the election" (169).
This book desperately needed an index so one can look up any foundation and its [mis]deeds. It's not just Gates. It's Carnegie, Ford, Kellogg, Casey, Soros, Andrus/Surdna, MacArthur. It's the NEA and AFT. They strive to "hide their outsize power and manufacture the illusion of organic consensus around an issue where there was none" (190). They "pursue the only challenge left for people with endless ambition and billions of dollars" social engineering. The Ford Foundation came to see itself as the 'research and development arm of society'...with a fixation on race" that started with eugenics (179). Having been involved with many nonprofits, I affirm Rosiak's revelations and warn you about leaving your money in a trust or to a foundation. It is very unlikely to be used in the way that you stipulate. When I pointed out the unethical behavior, I was told I didn't understand how nonprofits work. I guess not.
I have applied for over 1,000 jobs at this writing. I was shocked and dismayed (as well as deeply grateful) to read about so many of the schools and foundations to which I applied multiple times. Rosiak exposes them as fraudsters, adding to transcripts courses never taken, falsifying attendance and academic records, seating students in front of computers with multiple choice questions they just "keep clicking till they got it right" (20), and charging districts at inflated rates, all in the name of "dismantling inequitable systems that privilege whites." Evidently, I dodged many bullets.
I defy anyone to read every single word of this book; it lends itself to skimming. This book is too long by at least one-third, far too detailed with too many examples, and desperately needed an index. It was heavily weighted toward the Greater Metropolitan D.C. area and NYC. There was absolutely nothing about rural issues in education. The last third of the book had very little to do with education and was about policy in general, particularly issues of development, like the attempt to create greater population density in the suburbs. I think this summary covers the major issues. Save yourself a read unless you want the gory and salacious geographically-specific details.