The first time I read one of these Victor series, with The Hunter, I was entirely hooked. I'd always felt there was a lack of thriller stories where the hitman/cia/agent/blackop/etc character acts with the proper amount of paranoia and skill. Someone who has survived in such a dangerous line of work as being a professional hitman who operates solo, needs to have a very high degree of skill, experience, paranoia, and a willingness to kill immediately whenever necessary.
The first stories, perhaps it was that I'd never seen something done so perfectly, because Victor really was all that, or if they were better overall. I think it's a bit of both. There have always been a few flaws here and there in these novels, but I definitely feel that increasingly, as time passes, there appear more and more.
It's just these little moments where it becomes obvious that the author has opted to be a little lazy. He has a plot in mind and wants to make it happen. He likes it when Victor gets captured because then seeing Victor get out of that is fun and tense. He likes Victor to interact with other killers because of course, this is always interesting and enjoyable.
It's not that I mind these things, it's just that in this one particular, there were a number of moments that felt quite out of character, where I feel the author pushed the established character of Victor even further off the rails than normal. When the capture moment, and the tense talks with other killers moment, come at the expense of Victor doing some dumb shit I wouldn't expect from him, that gets him in very avoidable trouble, it sours these moments overall. I definitely feel the author could've got these fun moments into the story, in a way that didn't require Victor to do things that were quite so silly.
I'm just gonna go through up to where I'm up to, so spoilers from here on out.
At the start of the story we see Victor being arrested. He's in town to kill some Russian mobster. But, they've already been killed by someone else, and the police think its him. There is clearly something afoot because he definitely didn't kill the guy, but the guy is dead and he's been framed.
He ends up going to jail. This was quite unusual, but I didn't mind it. It was interesting and fun seeing him in jail, his views on it, the whole macho thing.
There he encounters the man who hired him to kill the guy, who is quite upset with him because he's gotten himself caught. This man, also a russian mobster, invites him to a clandestine midnight meeting in his room - alone.
This is where it went a bit off the rails imo. After a brief talk, Victor kills the man. Now, I quite enjoyed this at first because hey, bit of unflinching murder, very cool, I'm a fan. But I was a little confused because this dude clearly didn't set him up - he is convinced Victor did the killing, as hired to do. He has no involvement in the setup which Victor is still in the dark about. But maybe Victor could have asked questions and gotten some details, tried to work out what was going on? Nope he just kills the guy lol. This is... never really explained or delved into. I was expecting at least something like, the guy knew who he was and could implicate him so had to die. Which would be fair enough but, yeah, there was just never anything mentioned and generally when there is a larger problem Victor is willing to spare people to work out what is going on.
It becomes quickly clear why Victor killed that man so quickly and kind of randomly as we get to the next few chapters. It turns out this guy was the son-in-law of the biggest boss of the russian mob, an oligarch who loves nothing more in life than... his daughter. For her, he must avenge this killing, and immediately turns all resources to this.
It's a fairly standard Victor setup in this regard, we've seen russian mobsters quite a few times, we've seen a powerful man deciding Victor must die due to reasons various times, too. It's a bit formulaic but still, enjoyable enough. My issue is that I was still waiting to learn why exactly Victor decided to kill the dude... and then that is never really explained but, with this reveal, it becomes very clear that for PLOT reasons, Victor had to kill that man. It was much less about the character being himself, and much more about pushing the story forward.
So, a bit of a black mark but whatever, we go on. The carnage has to start somehow, right? At the very least, I was thinking that Victor in this story was looking to be especially unflinching and murderous. Seeing him kill someone at the drop of a hat is something I'm always up for.
On we go, and next up Victor is meeting with his broker, Phoenix. He doesn't seem too concerned about who/why set him up. The mystery is sitting in the background, I guess. So, meets broker, she's hot, they have the sex, again standard stuff. She wants to meet again. Breaking protocol, Victor does it anyway because... idk, reasons.
Goes to the meet and the big shoot out happens which the story started with in media res. The broker wants him dead!!! What a surprise. From there, he starts trying to track her down. He goes to a tailor she mentioned to interrogate the man about where her safe house is and...
another killer turns up, asking the same question. A french woman who the broker is apparently, also trying to kill. Okayy..? It turns out she was there at the first assassination attempt on him, too. This is quite a coincidence. You wouldn't expect such a competent broker to try and kill two assassins at once in this two birds one stone method, that seems apt to go wrong.
The new assassins says hey let's team up and go hunt the broker down together.
She leads him to her car and she has two guys with her, her team.
They drive to the brokers safe house, and, surprise surprise no one is there.
This is where it started to get weird for me. Because Victor then travels with these guys and its obviously highly suspicious. We the reader knows the broker setup more traps for him because that was shown in her POV. VIctor didn't see that but we know, he should be suspicious here - and he is. Which is good.
He ends up alone with the two guys. I'm remembering how he instantly murdered that guy in the jail before the guy could do anything. We see from his internal monologue that yep, he does know something is up, he hasn't lost his mind. These guys are acting increasingly suspicious.
One of them leaves the room and... Victor doesn't creep up on the other guy and quietly murder him. Instead he starts talking in a way that makes it clear he knows what's up. Oh, also he went and found a knife before all this. At this point, I was thinking... did he lose his pistol? Cuz he had a pistol. So why didn't he perhaps, draw that first...
Anywya the guy immediately draws a gun and holds him up after he makes it clear he knows. Victor is cool as a cucumber. The guy comes over to disarm him - I guess he does still have his pistol. And Victor stabs him with the secret knife. This was seriously unnecessary, I was quite confused at this point. There was no reason for it to go like this. He literally had one of the killers who has been hired to kill him aiming a gun at him. He pretty much engineered it going like that. The guy didn't shoot him because... idk? Why didn't he shoot him lmao. It makes no sense to me.
After stabbing him, Victor continues their conversation. The guy was asking if he enjoys the work they do. He says yes he does and osme other philosophical shit. It's a few paragraphs. Only after he's finished his little speech does he actually go to grab the guys gun, which gives the guys friend time to come back... and, oh, bad luck, the dead guy's hand has clenched so tight around the gun he can't pull it free. And he doesn't go for his own pistol either so, I'm still uncertain if he even has it or wtf happened. It seems to be there so someone can come and disarm it. But not there so he can't just shoot the guy walking in.
He has another intense fight, no guns, with massive steroid dude who just talked in. It goes bad and... he gets knocked out! End of chapter.
And this is where I realised why the character who earlier, killed a man very rapidly and saying very little, not giving them a chance to do anything (and this killing started the whole mess of the story), suddenly became all overly chatty, willing to squander his advantage, willing to let people draw a gun on him and generally willing to play things as badly as possible until he got captured... it's because the plot requires it. The author wants to have his 'Victor is captured now and the bad guys are gonna monologue at him and he'll get out of it through cleverness and viciously kill 'em all' and, I imagine that's different to engineer with a character like Victor, who is so endlessly paranoid and quick to kill.
This is really where my issue with these stories and many parts of this series overall come in. I do agree that Victor being captured is fun and interesting. I like to see the unarmed fights rather than him just shooting everyone in the back. It's just that, I definitely feel the author could, with a bit more thought, engineer these things to occur without tossing Victor an idiot ball. As it is, it starts to become pretty obvious when a scene is twisting away from how it should occur due to plot reasons. Suddenly Victor is doing an unnecessary monologue or he's telling people he knows and letting them draw a gun on him. That's what really annoys me and is the reason for the 3 stars. And, I know the author can do better than this. In this same fight, he goes to stab guy number 2 in the head - but the knife is crappy and old, must've been chopping onions for years, and it breaks on the guy's skull even though he hit the soft point. Now that's just shit luck. That I can entirely forgive, I don't mind it at all - no one can know and predict everything, nothing can go perfectly.
But when the character's actions change so rapidly in one story, and he gets the idiot ball at times like that, it makes it really obvious that there is a plot planned and that plot is gonna happen no matter what. And if the easiest way to make it happen, is to have Victor do something a little out of character or a little stupid, I guess that's fine. Personally, if he had left the guy at the start alive and grilled him for info THEN killed him, I'd have been much more fine with that. And if he'd simply murdered those 2 guys by shooting them in the back... I would have enjoyed that more, too. I don't need some quota of 11 unarmed fights, 7 shoot outs, 3 chase scenes, to be met every book. I'm just interested in seeing Victor make smart decisions and be that top tier, insanely paranoid killer that he is.
Also, the dislike of swearing/blasphemy is becoming increasingly cringe ngl. He was unusually chatty in this one and some of his lines were quite cheesy lol.
Still, overall I still really enjoy the majority of the action in this series, and all the detail and thinking that goes into the characters decisions. In general it's good. Buit here and there where the author is forcing things for the plot, it starts to lose its charm. I haven't read any further yet because seeing him get captured in such a dumb and unnecessary way made me put the book down.
edit: and the thing is, I KNOW Tom Wood can do better than this because I've read it. Book #1, the Hunter, is still one of the best there was. That one the focus was laser tight and Victor didn't make a single off/bad decision I can think of. I mean, he gradually got won over and began to have feelings for Rebecca - but I don't mind that at all. Those rare moments of humanity in someone who has so little are what makes him interesting for me. But there wasn't any unnecessary monologuiing that gives someone time to walk in so he has to fight them unarmed, and there was no random killing of people who he knows nothing about and who might have information - in fact Rebecca was an example of someone who he expressly didn't kill because she had information. The only part that wasn't quite up to standard was the very end where, there were a few moments where bullets were fired at one another but, they didn't hit. Still overall it was perfect and the slightly hollywood ending is forgivable. This one not so much. A few of the others really stand out as being amazing start to finish, too, mostly the earlier ones. These later ones, I do feel the author is getting a little lazy.
edit:
I finished the book.
It did turn out there were some extra plays and twists. It didn't end quite how I expected. Still feel this is one of the weaker Victor novels.
If Tom Woods ever reads this: many of the earlier books are amazing and imo the best books ever written in this genre. I really appreciate you for those, and this one is still good enough to scratch the Victor itch.
All I'd say is, and this is ofc just my opinion, but I don't think you need to always have him end up in these difficult fights. Not every situation has to be pushed to the point where he's on the backfoot and has an intense brawl.
Like, the bit with the two guys and then he gets knocked out by steroid guy. There was no need for him to ever have a gun pointed at him - he clued the guy off when he started basically saying: I know you're plotting something against me, and then got a gun pointed at me. I'm also still really confused about where his pistol went. But yeah he could've just closed in and stabbed the guy and taken his gun, or just shot him or held him hostage to keep him silent while waiting for the other guy to come.
For me, I'd have found this more satisfying - I really love it when Victor simply makes optimal moves, in fact imo those are more enjoyable and fit his character better than these moments where he kinda invites a close melee brawl. At the end of it all he did end up killing steroid guy, but I guess it gave that tension when he got knocked out - and I did really like that steroid guy had a heart attack, you were suggesting that might happen from the moment we met him and it was nice to see it lol.
But just in this case it was overall a moment that left a real sour taste because Victor only got into that situation due to bad decision making that doesn't match up with his generally smart, calculating, and risk avoidant nature. I just don't see any logical reason for him to tell the guy he knows and ensure a gun is drawn on him, when the other guy was still relatively relaxed and playing along with the ruse. It was a dramatic moment which, sure, that's fun - but tarnished by the nature in which it happened.
I feel sure that with some editing of scenes like this you could have the best of both worlds - a situation where Victor plays it optimally, but due to simple bad luck or coincidence, he still ends up in a sticky spot giving us the fun tension. Even if not, for me I would 100% prefer that there is less tension but he just wins the day by being smart + using his experience. For me I find that super super satisfying and it is one of my favourite things you do in this series. His skill at combat is awesome to read too, but only when the combat is happening because it had to happen, not when it could've easily been avoided.
Still an awesome series overall!