I didn't dislike this book but frankly, it'd have made more sense to keep the subtitle as "homosexual politics" than the updated version of "LGBT identities" because the trans community in particular was little more than a footnote until the afterword. Even for example in parts when the narrative quoted something about "sex changes", went into some detail of Magnus Hirschfeld's work or spoke about Stonewall, trans people were not even mentioned. In the afterword, the author discusses (very briefly) some prominent trans people and the work of trans organisations like WPATH and Press For Change, which would have made much more sense to talk about when he was going through the relevant time periods throughout the book. Trans-specific legislation like the GRA was only briefly mentioned. Groups like genderqueer people and intersex people were mentioned even less frequently. Not only is the concept of these groups far from new, but they were there the whole time alongside homosexual people fighting for rights, law reform, forming organisations etc. It is already a glaring omission from the history but particularly with an updated subtitle of "LGBT identities". Intersectionality was also barely touched upon and in fact, if I remember correctly, more space was given to a quote implying that groups like Black queer people forming their own organisations led to more division than the actual racism etc. in groups like GLF. This book could be made much better if such omissions were addressed properly.