This book is a hot mess. I came very close to DNF-ing it. It is not at all what it claims to be. The only reason it gets three stars is because I did like some bits in the book.
Let's begin with the subtitle. It claims to be "a history of the world series." Regarding the word "history," I feel much like Inigo Montoya, in The Princess Bride. "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." In my opinion, this is most definitely not a "history," not the way I understand the word.
A "history" of the World Series would begin at the beginning and trace the World Series through its various incarnation to the present day. Kepner's book does not do that. Not even close. Just to make sure it wasn't just me, I read some other reviews of the book. Sure, there were those who loved it and gave it five stars. My favorite one, though, described it as "piles of stuff." And that's exactly how I saw it.
It is almost a random meandering of trivia and facts about the World Series. There is a lot of information in this book. But it is not presented in any kind of orderly fashion. Even within chapters (seven chapter, because there could be seven games in the WS), the information was pretty much random, almost as though the author were writing in "stream of consciousness" style.
Oh, and lest I forget, he almost lost me on the first page of the Introduction, when he said that the Boston "Pilgrims" won the first World Series. That's a mistake that a sports writer for the New York Times should never make. There is no official evidence that there was ever a team called the Pilgrims. Yes, they have been referred to as Pilgrims, but it was never the official name. In fact, the Boston American League team never had an official name until they were called Red Sox. Also, Kepner calls them Boston American in a later chapter, in reference to that same 1903 World Series. So, which is it, Tyler?
So what did I like about the book? Chapter 2 chronicled some lesser known facts about a select group of WS, things that contributed more to the outcome than what is best known about those particular series. And, in contrast to the rest of the chapters, they were actually in chronological order, not seemingly random thoughts.
Chapter 7 was mostly a bunch of various lists, including a list of "Ten Things We Still Haven't Seen" in World Series. For example, we have never seen someone thrown out at home plate to end a World Series. We haven't seen a position player pitching in relief in a World Series. We've seen that plenty in regular season, especially in a blow-out situation, but never in a WS. And, oddly enough, the Philadelphia Phillies have never played a Game 7.
There's also a list of slogans that various teams had inscribed in their WS rings, which was very interesting. From this I learned the origins of the "Do Damage" phrase that was being said among the Red Sox during the 2018 WS.
And the book concludes with this author's opinion of what are the ten greatest World Series of all time. And, while I do think the 1991 series (number 1 on his list) was epic, with the Twins winning a 0-0 tie in ten innings to end game 7, I still think that the 1975 Reds/Red Sox series was the best one ever. Game 6 was possibly the most epic World Series game ever played. But I'm biased, as a Red Sox fan. That is number 2 on Kepner's list.
In short, a very disappointing book, considering how excited I was to find it at the library, last week. If it hadn't billed itself as a "history," my reaction might be better, but probably not, because of the "piles of stuff" nature of the whole thing.