The author of this story has to have a severe case of OCD. I base this on her tendency to explain things to such an extent that the word Overexplaining does not quite cover what she actually does here to the detriment of the story and the entire reading experience. I'll get to that in the third paragraph.
The plot itself is very interesting and got me sucked in pretty quickly. I felt bad for the three main chatacters. Three sister who have grown up in a dysfunctional family that gives new meaning to how bad a dysfunctional family can be. The family has it all. Horrible communication, no communication, drugs, and abuse. This is just what I came up with off the top of my head that I remembered. As bad as my family was growing up, compared to the family in this story my family was The Walton's.
As great as the story is, it is bogged down with the author's need to know that her Readership is understanding every iota that is going on. She does not want to leave even the most minuscule detail to chance, in terms of the reader's understanding of it. It's like someone explaining to someone in a three-page, single-spaced, information brochure how to unwrap a piece of bubble gum. For starters, it's an insult to the reader. I think that most people who are avid readers are relatively intelligent and are capable of discerning the nuances of a plot without a paint-by-numbers explanation of what is happening. This level of forced illumination is insulting and makes it feel as if the author is forcing feeding the reader much more of herself than is necessary. For God's sake, let us read the book ourselves and stop acting like a Helicopter Mom.
By the middle of the book I already had a good idea who the Bad Guy was. I turned out to be right, but the way the author fleshed out the character they were pretty much invisible. Throughout the most important time of the story, we know he exists, but he exists more like a two-dimensional, magazine picture. We just know that he is a close friend of somebody, who does get a lot of speaking parts in the story. The actual Bad Guy plays second fiddle and we know little to nothing about him when he should have been elevated in importance to his close friend in the story so that the reader could see how that would make sense later on that he was the Person of Interest. Instead, I found myself going back to previous chapters in the book in order to flesh him out a bit. But, there wasn't any material on him because he was so underdeveloped. Why would an author create such an elaborate story, yet undermine it by doing something like this? I tried to view it from different angles, but it all came out the same. It was non-sensical and made the "coming out" of the character almost anti-climatic. We don't care about him one way or another, because we don't know anything about him.
Yet, once we know how things are playing out, all of a sudden this character comes out of the woodwork and almost single-handedly takes over the story. They become the center from which everything else revolves. It's too bad that the author didn't find a middle ground for this character as it would have balanced out the story.
About three quarters in we find out, for those discerning individuals like myself, lol, who the Bad Guy is. Everything starts falling into place in terms of what really happened and who was to blame. Who the bad actors were. The miscommunication. It comes together quite organically. Even a reader who isn't that astute at figuring things out would have seen it.
But instead of leaving it at that, the police are brought in. With one particular detective who takes a particular interest in the case. One of the sisters explains, in excruciating detail, the entire plot of the story back to this police detective. Just about every single detail is retold - again. So, not only have we read it ourselves and come to some solid conclusions that are helping us tie up the main pillars of the story and all the loose ends. We now have to have two of the book's characters do the exact same thing! It's one of the most annoying things I have ever had to wade through. Rereading the synopsis of an entire plotline after already reading the book and coming up with obviously the same conclusions. It was such a waste of time, words and paper to do this and did absolutely nothing to propel the story. If anything, it bogged down the story to the point the book itself was ready to fall asleep.
In retrospect, I have to say that there are many things that are repeated throughout the entire book. It's like a teacher explaining a Dr. Seuss book to an adult who a double Master's Degree in Reading and Literature. Most of what was explained, and re-explained didn't need to be. I believe that most readers caught it at the first pass.
Although this was my main gripe with the story, another thing that I found most annoying was the author's tendency to fall on the same verbs when describing what state of mind a character was in when they were saying something. Although there are literally hundreds of ways to say how something said something. i.e. said, yelled, screamed, whispered et al, the author seems to be particularly enamored with the word "quietly." No matter what kind of conversation is taking place one of the characters also says something quietly. It got to the point that I found myself counting how any times this particular word was used. I think I stopped counting after seven or eight. Where was the editor? Anytime something is over-repeated, a figure of speech or anything else, that word or phrase becomes a blocking point for the reader. It throws them out of the story. It makes me realize that I'm reading a story, when I'm trying to stay in the moment and enjoy the story. To lose myself in it. It amazes me that a published author makes these kind of rookie mistakes, but I also have to wag my finger at the editor's, proofreaders, and anybody else who has a say in the creation of the book, why they would let something like that slide? It might seem like I'm nitpicking, but I'm not. If something is getting in the way of my reading experience, and I'm sure other people as well found this irritating then it should be corrected. The process needs to be tightened up. It's always all in the details.
If anybody feels I'm being overly harsh, I won't apologize for this review. I never write anything unless I actually have felt that it's truthful and needs to be said. This was a great story, but as indicated it was over thought out, over-processed, overdone, to the detriment of the story.