3.5
«If I am the chief of sinners, I am the chief of sufferers also»
Right off the bat I’ll say: if you have the opportunity of going into this completely blind, I urge you to do it. I, together with what I assume to be many others, was already familiar with the mythical motif of «Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde» through pop cultural references or metaphorical language, which unfortunately deprived the story of its mysterious and shocking quality. I definitely think the best way to enjoy this is to approach it as cluelessly as the Victorian Englishmen did in 1886.
This was an engaging novella that was just the right length for what it wanted to accomplish, and I could comfortably finish the audiobook in one sitting. The tone was strange and ominous, giving a sensation that much of the plot was occurring in the shadowed background while we were only seeing the scattered traces. The plot was relatively simple and easy to follow, with a small cast of characters with distinct roles, making it a digestible mystery that still harbored deeper themes.
!!! —— As I find it impossible to discuss anything else without revealing the premise, there will be SPOILER-y references from now on —— !!!
The story is most notable for its take on the great battle between good and evil - not between the angels and the devils, heroes and villains, but between parts of our very selves. Human nature is composed of various tendencies that all compete to influence our behavior, both of the primitive and egocentric kind and of the sophisticated and harmonic kind, each wanting to improve our life quality in some way. Robert Louis Stevenson personifies this internal struggle as a dual existence: at once the upright, noble and social Dr. Jekyll and the hideous, rash and violent Mr. Hyde.
Instead of drawing the line between «good» and «bad» people, Stevenson invites the idea that these opposing forces naturally coexist within every person. While portraying this split in a comically literal way, the story can also be interpreted as equalizing by highlighting this inherent quality of all humans: the capacity of both goodness and evil.
«I learned to recognise the thorough and primitive duality of man; I saw that, of the two natures that contended in the field of my consciousness, even if I could rightly be said to be either, it was only because I was radically both.»
I was also intrigued to learn about its impact on the public consciousness when Jack the Ripper terrorized London in 1888, two years after the novel was published. With the story’s moral freshly in mind, the people of England were haunted by the idea that the unidentified killer could be anyone in society, as even the most respectable figures might be hiding monstrous tendencies. Their fellow emergence hence established a cultural connection between the fictional story and the real-life murders, which must have made the novella and its themes feel extra chilling at the time.
Lastly, the story also has a notable metaphorical value for the hardships of drug addiction and substance abuse. Personally, I was familiar with «Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde» as a metaphor for transforming into a completely different person while being under the influence of alcohol. In the story, we not only see the act of drinking a mysterious potion being the origin of the evil Mr. Hyde, but also Dr. Jekyll developing an addiction to the potion to either access or control his alter ego, then how the personal consequences eventually spiral beyond the potion’s control. Eventually, Dr. Jekyll realizes that what started as naïve experimentation with the drink is now threatening to destroy his life by trapping him within the corruption.
!!! —— End of SPOILER zone —— !!!
It was fun to finally get around to this book, but in the end I think that the myth will hold a stronger hold on me than the story itself. Compared to «Frankenstein», arguably my all-time favorite book, I didn’t feel like I discovered much additional content in this story that could rework, expand or accompany my original idea of it.
«The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde» definitely deserves its reputation and its place in the literary canon, and it still holds relevance today, but the reading experience becomes less suspenseful and mind-blowing if you already get the gist. That’s why I think it is best experienced without any prior expectations, allowing it to mimic the effect it had on readers when it was first published.