The author (who was a personal acquaintance of many of the book's subjects) crafts a fascinating narrative around the lives of the Iraqi branch of the Hashemite family, yet so much of their character still remains a mystery. de Gaury excels at details; he is definitely one who majors in the minors, and even though that's fascinating - particularly when acquainting readers with human subjects that no doubt they're not at all familiar with - it's never entirely satisfying. I found the subtitle to be quite accurate: this is definitely a tragedy...but de Gaury steers away from presenting the narrative of the Hashemites as some national tragedy and instead focuses on the personal tragedy of a doomed kingdom: well-intentioned rulers (well, the two Faisals, that is) who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. The only nitpick I have is that I wish de Gaury had written more (also, because he was the most closely acquainted with the rather controversial regent, it's the regent who gets the most attention in the narrative, which I definitely noticed). Three Kings in Baghdad was first published a mere few years after the coup that overthrew the monarchy, so I imagine de Gaury's intention was to write more of a tribute than a detached account of the monarchy. Regardless, I highly, highly recommend this book for anyone interested in the history of the modern Middle East region, and/or any royal history enthusiasts.