As a connoisseur of books about books and a follower of the instagram account that inspired this book, this was an automatic buy for me.
The author stops people on the subway in NY (I think only in NY, but I could be wrong) and asks a few short questions about the book she sees them reading.
This is like a dream job to me. When I see people reading in public, I actually will crane my neck and walk out of my way to see if I can see what they are reading. It just fascinates me. One, I feel like I only get to talk/think about books in my little corner of the world---be it on Goodreads, with a close friend, or with my book club. In general, people don’t just bring up books they are reading at work or in social settings. If anything, people turn to discussing a tv show or movie. So seeing my interest in the wild feels special. Also, I love to see if the book they are reading is anything I have heard of and even more than that, if it “matches” the split second judgment I get of the person reading it.
If I had any complaint with the book, it would be that the interviews seem almost too curated. It started to feel like every interview had a progressive theme. Many people were reading very heavy reads. Everyone was reading to understand the gentrification in their neighborhood, or reading like, a huge biography on Malcolm X, or reading to become a better activist or whatever else. To be clear: I don’t have a problem with any of this and I’m a progressive person myself. I love non-fiction, I like to be challenged. All good! It just started to feel a bit inauthentic somehow? Where were the people who are like, “Oh, I just picked this up because it was a Read with Jenna pick…” or were re-reading a childhood favorite, or were reading fluff because the world was too much at the moment. Or were maybe reading some actually good quality literary fiction but didn’t have some big backstory behind it that informed their politics or whatever. Maybe NY is really just that much more cultured than the Midwest. But did she really not come across many of those readers (and aren’t we all those readers sometimes?) or were they just not worthy of the book?
Also, she had a handful of famous people who were interviewed, which was cool...but IDK, the whole appeal is that she is just (supposedly?) stopping people at random. The odds she happened to stumble across all these famous people is basically zero, soooo then did they then get the time to think about the perfect book to be seen with and what to say about it?
Overall, minor issue. The book was still interesting and fun.
Some of my favorite tidbits from interviews:
I have everything I need, yet I am not satisfied. And you know what? A lot of joy comes from slowing down and being nice to people. Have a conversation with the guy at the deli you’ve seen every day for the past three years and never talked to. That’s your neighbor. Resist running into the store, finding what you need, and leaving. Just be a part of the store. That stuff spreads joy.
pg 91
My practice is to draw something every morning and every night, which feels equally transformative. In the mornings, I draw a toy duck. It’s the same duck on a tricycle, but it’s like a zen thing because I see it at a slightly different time, in a slightly different light, and it changes. I’ve been drawing the duck in the morning every day for two years and my dish rack every night for about four years. It’s akin to a magician practicing scales, I guess. It keeps me sharp, and the dish rack reminds me of my kids, I guess. I see them every day but do I really “see” them? Not if I’m not paying attention. Now I notice everything around me is changing. This morning the duck came out very Picasso-like.
pg 92
This is a difficult experience to describe. I’m reading Leaves of Grass for the fourth or fifth time. It feels a little bit like looking at a painting.
pg 133