According to its Library of Congress call number, this is a book about psychology, subsection affection, feeling, emotion. This is a little misleading. Miller isn't a psychologist; most of his examples are drawn from literature, especially the Icelandic sagas, Dostoyevsky, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. But if you're put off by those sources, there's still a lot in here to enjoy. Much of the first chapter is about gift exchanges, both ancient and modern. Gift exchanges are bound up with honor, status differences, and the potential for embarrassment and humiliation. Miller investigates the historical development of shame, one of the oldest emotions; its cousins, embarrassment and humiliation, are relative latecomers.
This, from the Introduction, gives a taste of what follows:
One might hazard the strong claim (with some amount of irony) that our world is divided into two types of people: those who humiliate themselves but who are too insentient to know it, and those who feel each social interaction as a minefield in which one's esteem and self-esteem can be blown into a million foolish little shards. These latter are in the mold of the characters who crowd the pages of Dostoyevsky's novels; they find that the best strategy for avoiding humiliation is to become expert at enduring it, even to self-inflict it in order to have it on their own terms. These are the souls who accept that humiliation is a fact of social life, who make sure never to be caught being seen as foolish without knowing that they are playing the fool, and who never let others see them without first seeing themselves as others would, while presuming these others to be as expert in discerning a fool as they themselves are. They can then satisfy themselves on their greater perspicacity, their greater self-awareness, and on their ability to manipulate the audience that condemns them.