It seems likely that far more Dukes appear in Regency novels ans novellas than have ever walked the earth, even were I to throw in fakes and pretenders on the side of once living. Without bothering to look it up, I am going to guess that maybe 1,000 such titles have ever existed and most of those titles haven't had 10 office holders. Against that we have one of the most popular character titles in English literature in the most popular fiction genre with the highest sales. While not all authors are half so prolific as Burrowes, a few are, so again, without doing the simplest googling, I am guessing that more than 20,000 fictional dukes have been published in this century.
Anyone with free time and the inclination is welcome to explain to me all the ways in which my assumptions are laughably bad.
This is a charming story with a resolution I find particularly satisfying.
The actual business of having titled people with considerably more than their fair share of land, wealth, and influence offends my every notion of how humans should organize themselves, what justice and equity require, and then to throw sexism on top and prohibit females from inheriting? Has no one noticed that the reigns of English queens have been quite amazingly long and productive, no matter how ill the gains are gotten and how poorly distributed?
Despite my issues with how poorly societies are managed in the real world, this story is sweet and amusing and clever.
Come to think of it, my issues with society are probably why I sit here reading so often: I want happy endings and virtues rewarded.
Personal copy