Tracing the transformation of early modern academics into modern researchers from the Renaissance to Romanticism, Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University uses the history of the university and reframes the "Protestant Ethic" to reconsider the conditions of knowledge production in the modern world.
William Clark argues that the research university—which originated in German Protestant lands and spread globally in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries—developed in response to market forces and bureaucracy, producing a new kind of academic whose goal was to establish originality and achieve fame through publication. With an astonishing wealth of research, Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University investigates the origins and evolving fixtures of academic life: the lecture catalogue, the library catalog, the grading system, the conduct of oral and written exams, the roles of conversation and the writing of research papers in seminars, the writing and oral defense of the doctoral dissertation, the ethos of "lecturing with applause" and "publish or perish," and the role of reviews and rumor. This is a grand, ambitious book that should be required reading for every academic.
William Clark's "Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University" reveals how the concept of academic charisma has evolved from personal brilliance to institutional recognition. In this reflective essay, I engage with Clark's analysis to explore how universities, once sanctuaries of thought, have become stages of performance—where recognition is often valued over genuine intellectual exploration.
As the pressure for visibility intensifies, scholars are forced to navigate a delicate balance between nurturing their intellectual passions and pursuing recognition. This essay critically examines how academic charisma has become a currency, not just of authority, but of survival, raising the question: can we still preserve spaces for genuine thinking in the age of performative knowledge?
Although often tiresome, this book provides original insights into the origins of the modern university. The author shows that early universities, from the 11th through the 16th centuries, thrived on nepotism and ill-defined professors who were supposed to be jacks of all trades. In the new Jesuit and Prussian universities of the 17th and 18th centuries, however, church and state subsidies and bureaucratic oversight forced universities to prove the value of hiring professors objectively. The "fame" of professors in certain well-defined subject areas, especially in Prussia in linguistics, gave bureaucrats a semi-objective measure about how to do this. In 1749 the Prussian ministry even passed the first "publish or perish" regulations, demanding regular publications from professors to show their value. It's a surprising origin story for modern academia.
I'm reading this one for a reason: to try to see if the history of academia might help me understand the confusing mess that it has become. What are the origins of all the weight of crazy traditions, secret voting, wacky expectations, pompous self-righteousness? Read and see! It's interesting to find out that Oxford and Cambridge actually had pretty lightweight reps in the Middle Ages.