How many stars does it take to tell the story of the universe? I have read both A History of the Universe in 21 Stars (and 3 imposters) and A History of the Universe in 100 Stars, so here’s a comparison of the two, in case you are wondering which one to choose.
A History of the Universe in 21 Stars (and 3 imposters)
It felt the least daunting to start with the book with the fewest stars. In A History of the Universe in 21 Stars (and 3 imposters), the author has selected stars that can illuminate many aspects of the star's life, with the criterion that they are largely visible if you want to observe them yourself. The chapters always start with a description of how to find them in the sky. Simple drawings aid you in your search.
Each chapter deals with a star and a topic that can be connected to that star. The book starts off a bit slow with Polaris as an entry point to talk about the movements of the stars across the sky, the ecliptic and latitudes, but after that the book is a joy to read. Some examples of stars and topics are Aldebaran which is used to talk about stellar spectra, Algol about variable stars, T Tauri about star births, Helvetios (51 Pegasi) about the discovery of exoplanets, Cygnus X-1 about black holes and supernova 1994D about the expansion of the universe and dark energy.
In each chapter, the author takes us on the scientific journey from the first observation or hypothesis associated with a bright dot in the sky, and towards today's understanding of it. It is exciting to read how astronomers have pieced together all the pieces over time to arrive at the understanding we now have of the starry sky, which consists of a wealth of star types.
The book is written in a popularized way with an informal tone. But it still goes quite deep into the matter at times. The author has done a formidable job of explaining the scientific material, as well as finding out the scientific history behind the stars. The author is also good at reminding us of what he has explained previously so that it is easy to keep up.
The book also includes simple drawings of various important concepts that are reviewed, such as the HR diagram, the anatomy of a black hole, and how light travels through a telescope.
What works so well with this book is that we are taken along on the scientific journey. The conclusions are never made in advance, and the history of the universe is not told from the beginning. The book follows the history of science from when astronomers first began to unravel the nearest and brightest stars and then delved more and more into more distant and strange stars. It becomes almost like a detective story where we hear about the theories that turned out not to work, and how others came up with better ideas, which have led us to what we know today.
The title of the book is somewhat misleading, because not much of the book is about the history of the universe. The book is mostly about the life of stars, with elements of cosmology near the end of the book when we get to Cepheids and supernovae, which were used to measure distances to galaxies and the expansion rate of the universe.
A History of the Universe in 100 Stars
Since this book deals with many more stars, the chapters are naturally much shorter than in the other book. They are limited to 3–4 pages. The author writes in the introduction that the chapters can be read in the order you want. That is because nothing is connected. This means that this book does not become one big story, like the other one.
The author writes in popularized style and explains things in a nice way, but the overall impression is still not very educational. The fact that the author had decided on the number 100 seems to have resulted in some of the stories not appearing to be very important. They may be funny and interesting, but do not contribute to a larger story and understanding about stars or the universe.
It often seems arbitrary which star has been chosen to tell a particular story. For example, the first chapter is about Altair, or Hikoboshi as it is called in Japanese, and the chapter tells the Japanese legend behind this name. Here Altair is used as a seemingly random example of us telling stories about the stars, and that many of the stars in the sky have names of Arabic origin.
The way this book is structured, there is no room for the author to take us on a scientific journey. For example, in the second chapter, the author abruptly jumps right back to the big bang and starts the chapter by presenting the theory we have for the beginning of the universe and how the distribution of the atomic elements was then. The star for this chapter is one of the oldest stars we know and supports the theory for the distribution of hydrogen and helium in the early universe. After having read the other book previously, it was unsatisfactory to have the theory for the beginning of the universe presented so quickly and so well-established, rather than being able to participate in the scientific journey to arrive at that conclusion. For a book that aims to tell the history of the universe with 100 stars, it also took a bit of the fun out of the book to have so much of the history of the universe presented already in chapter two.
What this book did have that the other one didn’t, were examples of more recent studies of the stars, such as a 2010 study that looked at the origin of elements in the universe. Because there are still details for today's astronomers to figure out.
Conclusion
Popular science books about the universe often deal with the history of the universe, galaxies, dark matter, etc., where the stars usually play a small supporting role. It was therefore refreshing to read a more thorough presentation of the stars and the scientific exploration of them.
I am puzzled by the fact that both book titles begin with A History rather than The History, because the universe only has one story. In the book with 100 stars, the author writes in the preface that the stars in the book together "tell one of many possible stories about the universe", and I wonder what he really means by that.
If you are going to read one of these books, it is probably already obvious which one I would recommend. It’s clear that A History of the Universe in 21 Stars (and 3 imposters) has a well-thought-out selection of stars to tell the story of the stars in a coherent and exciting way, while the book with 100 stars tells a large and seemingly random selection of stories and anecdotes. However, the 100-star book can work well if you want a book where you can read a small and simple story every day.