An enjoyable read, but I fear a forgettable winner of the Miles Franklin Award. I doubt it shall be read in 20 years unlike other past winners.
The themes of grief and sudden, unexpected loss run strongly, and they are covered well. However, other aspects within the novel are either borderline clichés or fanciful, and have been explored numerous times already.
The strained relationship between Erica and Daniel (the attempts Erica goes to ensure Daniel gets stimulation in the prison, and the efforts she makes to hide her life), is well presented and I found interesting. This is strong parental love, that may or may not be borne out of guilt. We are allowed into a portion of the back story of Erica being a sole parent: was she neglectful? we can’t know for we strike the problem of her being the narrator. It doesn’t truly feel so, but then there is Daniel’s behaviour towards her during the prison visits.
Something Erica & Daniel share is the obsessive love for a love that is lost: for both, an absent parent. Erica is somewhat obtuse in her feelings towards her lost mother, but then she has had a longer period to process it, and had the responsibility of her own child. Conversely, Daniel, being younger, his obsession is just that. Lohrey portrays this well – both in how Daniel achieves this, and in the way Erica discovers it. There is raw emotional pain here for Erica, which she hides as per her character.
It is also well to note how Lohrey describes the other young adult – parent relationship, where alternatively there was been no obstacles unlike what Erica experienced. I enjoyed how it was described and played out. For me, it highlighted that relationships are always much more than what a parent can give their children, but rather the expectations of the individual – both child and parent.
Erica and her interactions with the village is an interesting topic. When mature aged people uproot and retire in a new area, one is likely to have to commence new friendships and relationships. There is no shared history of growing old, but rather a group of people, now with set ideas and behaviours coming together for the first time. Lohrey accurately portrays coastal village life with its mix of old established and recently arrived people. Such as in rural living, it is often not where to go, but to who to go to for requests such as repair and supply people, or the generosity of strangers who will give excess be it food or stones in this instance.
I felt the Ray conversion miracle a little difficult to believe. I just couldn’t see that the activity observed by him would generate such a radical twist from misanthrope to altruist. The society party and the groping host was unnecessary, although it did help advance developing the relationships of Di and Lawrence. The incompetent immigration investigation was also clumsily done compared with other aspects of the novel.
Finally there is the Labyrinth itself. The metaphor often used in western pagan and religious beliefs is well explained and Erica explores the options of what it shall mean to her (and in a sly way, what it means to Lohrey). The new-wave scene and the canvas painted Labyrinth is a very funny scene and I wondered if it was based on personal experience. I enjoyed the musings of Erica and in particularly to a labyrinth symbolising life’s journey and possible religious or personal fulfilment in reaching the centre. The famous one is on the floor of the Chartres Cathedral is mentioned, and the pilgrimages in previous centuries using it to help find fulfilment. Lohrey’s repeated observation that in contemporary times, the labyrinth is often covered in chairs, could be an interesting response to how the Catholic church has in recent decades performed in its pastoral and devotive care. The process of how the project develops from plan to actuality was honest and I was reflective on the same emotions I experience along similar large projects. Just sometimes the planning stage is what one desires rather than a final outcome, and thus ending.
I seem to have been one of the few that observe the similarities between the labyrinth described in the early part of the novel and the final pages. I read some significance into the parallels.
I personally enjoyed the length of the novel – it’s tight, well scripted, and avoids waffle. I am glad it hasn’t been padded.