Prometheus: Archetypal Image of Human Existence is one in a series of essays Karl Kerenyi, - scholar of myth, "neo-pagan", and protege of Carl Jung - had written on his beloved Greek pantheon. Like the others in this series, Kerenyi scrutinizes all extant sources of pertinence to his subject. Sources here include Homer, Hesiod, Aeschylus, and many others.
The book is interesting as it identifies Prometheus as the personification of mankind's particular mode of existence, namely one of misery, as a polarity of the blissful existence enjoyed by the Olympians. It pays particular attention to the prophetic disclosures of Prometheus so as to possibly illumine a potential remedy to man's terrestrial suffering - And its intriguing what Kerenyi exposes.
Prometheus was a deity among the titans and a son of the great goddess Themis (according to Aeschylus), a variation of Gaia. Yet, during the great cataclysm known as the Titanomachy, he fought with the Olympians, the younger gods. Subsequent to this war and the creation of mankind (Either a creation of Prometheus, or, actually, associates of the titans, or the titans themselves), man and the gods occupied one pole. Prometheus, because of his relation to mankind (either as titans or a creation of his own) embarks on his first dissension against the will of Zeus: In the portioning of the first sacrifice, he allots to man the greater cuts, while leaving for the gods bones adorned presentably in the glistening fat of the slaughter. This leads to the establishment of the dual existential poles between gods and men; one of light and bliss, the other of darkness and suffering. In a second and final act of recalcitrance, Prometheus brings to primitive man (who dwell in "darkness") the element of fire, carried within the stem of the narthex, so that they may forge for themselves luxuries and various technologies. At this, Zeus becomes enraged and condemns Prometheus to an eternity of suffering. His punishment is to be chained to the summit of a Caucasian mountain where an eagle (the animal of Zeus and a glyph for the sun) will tear daily at his liver (Which for the Greeks was the seat of the passions). Prometheus laments at his great misfortune, about how he has been "wronged", and exclaims that his only crime was that he "loved man too well."
Kerenyi is interested in a juxtaposition between the kind of cruel justice (Dike) represented in Zeus and the kind of order associated with Themis, who seems to personify the original cosmic order prior to its usurpation by the "will of Zeus." Themis, no doubt, represents an ideal of worldly (not "otherworldly") bliss. However, it's very interesting as the dichotomy of Zeus - Themis could actually reflect a possible conflict of paradigms; the old, that of the matriarchal, and the new patriarchal rule. Regardless, its in many ways a cultural shock to witness a view vastly distinct from contemporary religion; that the earthly is actually just, but victim to a heavenly oppressor. (In Judea-Christian tradition, this is precisely the inverse.) The understanding was perhaps that man is a victim of obstinate laws and institutions which the ancient Greeks just couldn't identify as being inherent to "the Mother," and that man's Existential Misery (aka Prometheus) is the cosmic archetype for such justice (being a divine consequence of deliberate acts with otherwise good intentions).
Prometheus (whose name means "Prescience", and who has acquired this precise ability matrilineally) experiences a kind of sardonic reprieve from his knowledge of a particular secret, one unknown even to Zeus, that his world, the "Zeus-World" will, in fact, come to an end. But upon hearing of such things, with the violent crash of a thunderbolt, Zeus damns Prometheus to Tartarus for greater torments. It then all concludes with the revelation of a savior; a deity who will willingly take upon himself the sufferings of Prometheus and descend into the darkness of death (and who is not, yet, Jesus Christ). It is interesting to discover who this was, and who this eventually became for the entire Greek and Roman world.
Like Kerenyi's other expositions, Prometheus is valuable as a catalog of sources. It's therefore a practical necessity for anyone interested in its particular subject, Greek religion, or for those looking to draw parallels. While not familiar with its native language, the translation never felt clunky or odd, as is sometimes the case. It's a fairly quick read.
Kerenyi was the right kind of scholar. Motivated by sincere convictions, rather than a desire for approbation among peers, he breathed new life into the Powers that he felt circuiting throughout his being. One gets the impression from reading Kerenyi, that he was obviously a man with a very sane approach to religion; that it should affirm life rather than contradict it; breath with the individual, rather than smother him. Kerenyi found this in the living religion of the ancient Greeks and their representation of Forms that expressed his own Intrigue, his own Lust, even his own Misery. Because of the ubiquity of the latter, "Prometheus", it is truly an Image of solidarity; one that elevates the suffering of man to cosmic stature and significance.