Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Being Property Once Myself: Blackness and the End of Man

Rate this book
A prize-winning poet argues that blackness acts as the caesura between human and nonhuman, man and animal.

Throughout US history, black people have been configured as sociolegal nonpersons, a subgenre of the human. Being Property Once Myself delves into the literary imagination and ethical concerns that have emerged from this experience. Each chapter tracks a specific animal figure--the rat, the cock, the mule, the dog, and the shark--in the works of black authors such as Richard Wright, Toni Morrison, Zora Neale Hurston, Jesmyn Ward, and Robert Hayden. The plantation, the wilderness, the kitchenette overrun with pests, the simultaneous valuation and sale of animals and enslaved people--all are sites made unforgettable by literature in which we find black and animal life in fraught proximity.

Joshua Bennett argues that animal figures are deployed in these texts to assert a theory of black sociality and to combat dominant claims about the limits of personhood. Bennett also turns to the black radical tradition to challenge the pervasiveness of antiblackness in discourses surrounding the environment and animals. Being Property Once Myself is an incisive work of literary criticism and a close reading of undertheorized notions of dehumanization and the Anthropocene.

224 pages, Hardcover

First published May 12, 2020

13 people are currently reading
623 people want to read

About the author

Joshua Bennett

35 books82 followers
Joshua Bennett received his Ph.D. in English from Princeton University. He also holds an M.A. in Theatre and Performance Studies from the University of Warwick, where he was a Marshall Scholar. In 2010, he delivered the Commencement Address at the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated with the distinctions of Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude.

Winner of the 2015 National Poetry Series, Dr. Bennett has received fellowships from the Callaloo Creative Writing Workshop, Cave Canem, the Josephine de Karman Fellowship Trust, and the Ford Foundation. His writing has been published or is forthcoming in Boston Review, Callaloo, The Kenyon Review, Poetry and elsewhere. He has recited his original work at venues such as the Sundance Film Festival, the NAACP Image Awards, and President Obama’s Evening of Poetry and Music at The White House. He is currently a member of the Society of Fellows at Harvard University.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
19 (32%)
4 stars
28 (47%)
3 stars
9 (15%)
2 stars
3 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
Profile Image for Cana McGhee.
220 reviews7 followers
June 26, 2024
Bennett's strength as a poet shines through here, with his amazingly evocative descriptions of the texts at the center of each chapter. i appreciate the range of animals discussed throughout and love how he elucidates a "species thinking" about Blackness. i think i was missing a larger zoom-out, bigger picture perspective about how to consider Black studies and animality as a method, but the book sets out more to show how and where animals appear in Black literatures than develop a methodology per se. really good counterpart of Jackson's Becoming Human.
Profile Image for Dan Slone.
Author 3 books1 follower
November 19, 2021
A difficult, academic read. However, it rewards the work with insight on the depth of metaphors and symbols in several popular works. I was reading for insights on the current relationship of African Americans and non-humans, which is probably the weakest part of the book. It is much stronger in outlining the ways authors have explored the historic relationship of poverty and slavery to the animals that co-occupied that space. The strongest chapter was the first, on rats as simultanious pests and heroically strong survivors. The weakest was the chapter on dogs where the author seems to ignore some obvious but inconvenient symbolism and fails to acknowledge the cost of locating a narrative in the exploitive violence of dog fighting. I think this book is best for someone seeking insight into how great black authors have used animal symbols to provide nuance and depth to thinking about the roles and power of black men and black women present and past. The author does a good job of weaving together fragments of multiple works with each of the main books he is analyzing. This book met my test for four-stars, which is-it made me think and continue to expore after I put it down.
Profile Image for Emily Drez.
92 reviews
February 3, 2025
Phew. 3 stars because at least I learned something. However, the language got quite muddled and inaccessible at points. After all those meandering sentences (which quite literally took up several lines of the page... several ), I often wondered, "what was the point?" I think the problem is Bennett didn't necessarily hammer down his thesis statements, but rather went off on long-winded side tangents (coupled with massive block quotes), which distracted from The Point. By the end, I couldn't help but feel frustrated, as the writing almost seemed intentionally convoluted in the name of sounding smart. It's an incredible pursuit of intersectional literary theory, but it could have benefitted from tying up of the loose ends, so to speak.
72 reviews2 followers
November 28, 2022
Interesting analyses of Black literary texts. This book was useful for me to understand how Black writers have imagined alternative worlds through and with other-than-human animals. I would recommend reading this book alongside Alexis Pauline Gumbs's "Undrowned: Black feminist lessons from marine mammals".
Profile Image for Tasha.
916 reviews
December 31, 2020
I worked my way through this academic text (by a favorite poet) slowly and will return to reread and use parts in class. This complemented my year of reading Toni Morrison and added a depth to my understanding of her novels.
137 reviews
May 17, 2022
Read the intro and “Mule.” Some interesting ideas, not all of which I agreed with, but that’s okay. The writing, however, seems like it’s intentionally opaque. I can excuse long sentences when they are clear, beautiful, and serve a purpose; Bennett’s were neither, and his sentences only served to further obfuscate his point. I am a firm believer that dense topics need not be difficultly to read, and, unfortunately, Bennett seems to have portrayed the dangers of doing so.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.