This was my first John Glatt book, and it lived up to my expectations. I know he's written about cases I've heard about and ones I haven't and after this I intend to read about them all.
As for the Turpin case, this was one I was very aware of. I read news articles, watched documentaries, but this was my first book about them and I love how in depth it goes.
It covers generations of the family, and provides a possible reason why Louise went off the rails and became abusive. She sadly couldn't break the cycle. David, on the other hand, is a mystery. How is it that he "changed" Louise into an abusive person while rarely participating in the abuse himself? It's really odd.
And the way that no relatives or neighbours ever noticed something was terribly wrong with the family makes no sense either. Sometimes you really can't know, but shouldn't some relatives just come over for a surprise visit when they couldn't see the children any longer? It's not like they didn't know where they lived...
A random thing I'd like to focus on, is David's brother Randy's book that's mentioned in this novel, in which he describes that after three days of fasting (as in no food at all), people are no longer hungry (and have a heightened awareness of God).
And he has a 3-week fasting plan which includes a journal that you write down your cravings in and it's supposed to help with the process.
From my personal experience with an eating disorder, this is actually true. The first three days are the hardest, and it gets easier from there. I wouldn't say you're no longer hungry though, but it's something that gets pushed into the background the more you go without food, and eventually becomes a slight annoyance if I can describe it that way.
And the writing down helps a lot too. One summer I didn't eat a single thing for two whole months, and during that time I wrote down all my food cravings, telling myself that if I could hold on just a bit longer I'd be able to satisfy them.
Now, I do wonder if Randy's book/beliefs had any effect on David and Louise and why they starved their children. Maybe, maybe not. But why not starve themselves as well in that case? Because they're monsters.
If the fasting book was part of the cause, the poor children did not consent to it. I do believe that fasting for proper reasons and not eating disorder related ones can be beneficial in small quantities, but this is just inhumane.
Moving on, I expected a tiny bit more about the siblings' lives after the escape. We only got their hospital stay and the trial, no mention of where they are now, how are they doing and so on.
The trial too, was repetitive. We were already told what happened to the kids in the first portion of the book, there was no need to fill up page space by repeating it over and over again.
Also, I listened to the audiobook and had to pause it a few times, especially at the start, to process how horrific things actually were. I think the narrator did a good job, and I didn't want to speed him up too much (a compliment, as most narrators talk too slow for me and I struggle to listen below 2.5x speed for most books).