Larry King is apparently as bad of an author as he is an interviewer. I fail to see the fascination with him, or to understand his success. His interview style, like Barbara Walters, is short and choppy, machine-gun style, though not as hard hitting as he would have you believe. No flow, conversation or follow-ups. No probing or ability to really unearth underlying meaning, which is especially frustrating in a book purported to be "conversations" and to deal with spirtituality, which does not suit his interview style.
Larry seems almost proud of his own lack of spirituality, and is amused by his own simple-mindedness when it comes to matters of spirituality. I'm confused why he even wanted to take up this topic. He should have left it to Charlie Rose.