This book is a curative for easy answers, and a goad to further inquiry into one's existing conclusions about spirituality.
The central dichotomy of willingness and willfulness in relation to the divine may seem a bit simplistic, but in Gerald May’s hand it becomes a tool for fruitful inquiry. GM asks what exactly are we surrendering to in our willingness? Because not only is willingness often partial but what we surrender to is usually mixed [some worthy of and some not so worthy of surrender]. These are not questions that have absolute answers, this questioning is the context of grace and our human all too human attempts to allow the transcendent divine into our lives.
For GM willing surrender to a greater power is not the abandonment of responsibility in our daily lives, but the base from which we must become more responsible, more discriminating, more intelligent, and more careful of our actual power.
There is quite a bit of discussion about trying to substitute very human needs [sex, intimacy, power, and self-worth] to quench our desire for the transcendent. No need in itself can ultimately satisfy that hunger, nor should any relationship or object be burdened with such demands. When they are it leads to a lot of suffering and psychological problems which are explored in the book.
Any one perspective can become reductive and distorting if made the primarily lens through which we interpret the world. The experience of unity can be profound and a bedrock for a spiritual life but it is not an interpretive solution to all the mysteries/difficulties of life [thank god lol].
This is a spiritual psychology which sees an overlap between spirituality and psychology but an autonomous and primary nature to spirituality which cannot be reduced to psychology, though psychological inquiry can be very beneficial to spiritual journeying and avoiding pitfalls and self-delusions.
The book is clearly grounded in Gerald Mays actual experiences and this allows him to touch on many topics [only a few of which I’ve mentioned] without losing an earthiness and friendly conversational quality the book possesses.
A few criticisms: The writing can be a little repetitive and the organizing of topics is a bit haphazard. As often when trying to think about what kind of person is going to be centrally important in modern spirituality the author seems to describe a person that resembles themselves [spiritual friend/advisor].
It doesn’t have the precision or detail of a well-worn contemplative path, but it is much more down to earth and practical then most popular spirituality or theoretical transpersonal psychology books. These are issues and topics that clearly engaged Gerald May for most of his life, both internally and in dialogue with psychology clients and friends. This book is truly the fruition of a life spend in a rich spiritual dialogue and a searching/finding heart.