The kind of book that, for me, thrillingly, builds on some of my own deeply held intuitions and thought fragments, thoughtfully articulating the things I haven’t taken the time to develop. In college I discovered that almost every otherwise brilliant thinker failed this one very simple test: does their thinking (even tacitly) acknowledge the existence of babies? I now call it the No-babies fallacy and it’s sort of like the Bechdel Test, but instead of testing for anti-female bias it tests whether the thinker falls victim to the myth of human individual autonomy or self-sufficiency. Any line of thinking that does not (at least tacitly) acknowledge that we begin our existence utterly dependent on others is misguided. Hendren, in What Can a Body Do, refreshingly aces the baby test, exploring what it means for every human to live along a continuum of dependency. The book is built on the topic of disability studies and design for disabilities but it ends up being so much more than that; it is a potent corrective to our ubiquitous and flawed way of thinking about ourselves and each other.
It is also the type of book that had my neurons lighting up wildly with related pet intellectual associations and people I want to buy the book for. One particularly delightful line of thinking had me mentally cross-referencing the work of Krzysztof Wodiczko, only to find out a few chapters later that Wodiczko is Hendren’s mentor!
5 stars. Highly recommend to almost anyone, but especially if you are interested or invested in design, engineering, architecture, history, language, disability, activism, dependency, community, etc., etc.