Update:
I haven't stopped thinking about this book since I put it down in April of last year. I can't explain fully why I love it so much, but it's my new favorite horror book of all time.
Firstly, I've seen some other negative reviews that talk about the narrative style. It's important to remember throughout the book that we're reading from the perspective of Sarge. He's telling the story. Sarge is a humble, American, Army guy. He didn't go to university for literature. He's not a genius. He's your everyday guy just getting through this situation. Don't expect poetics and deep, thoughtful accolades. Read it with that in mind and everything matches Sarge's thoughts and personality perfectly. It's actually very well done.
Secondly, I take back what I said in my first review below. The length is perfect. The pacing is appropriate, in my opinion, for the perspective we're getting. I'm actually annotating this time around and I have gone through so many tabs and pens, taking notes. I don't think there are twenty pages so far (I'm halfway through) that I haven't made notes on and those were just heavy action scenes that I didn't think needed notes on.
But they're important because it's part of Sarge's memories and he makes that clear in the beginning that his main reason for telling his story is so he can get it out before his age starts to affect his memories. He's dwelling on these things. He's trying to make sense of it, after all these years. He's coming to terms with the things he believes is his fault and the things that weren't. One thing that I know personally from dealing with PTSD is that the things you do remember, the things that your brain hasn't completely blocked out...no matter how irrelevant they seem or how mundane...they meant something at the time, or they mean something still in the bigger picture.
So, what I'm trying to say to those who haven't read it or are thinking about reading it is that you should go into it with the mindset of the main character. Really get into his head. Digest it slowly.
First Review:
The best way I could review this book was by doing a comparison between both books in this series, One Last Gasp and A Song for the Void. I’ll do this by CAWPILE as that is what makes the most sense to me and I’ll attempt to keep the spoilery bits to a minimum. I’m not going to rephrase the synopsis for the books because I feel both explain the books rather well.
Characters: This was one area that I was drawn to both books for different reasons. I loved the number of characters that we got in One Last Gasp. However, I feel like only a handful of those characters were fleshed out. I wanted to get more from characters like Shorty, Davey, and Goliath. In A Song for the Void, I feel like, when the author focused on only one or two characters in the forefront, we got more character development. The main character in A Song for the Void felt more real than the main character in One Last Gasp. I would love to see the author marry these two things in the third book…more characters, but equal character development…maybe a multiple POV!
Atmosphere: Perhaps it is because WWII feels more tangible than the Opium Wars to me, but One Last Gasp really wins in this area. Maybe it is because we know what’s going on in the world at that point in time. With that being said, A Song for the Void definitely makes you feel isolated. Being trapped on a ship in open water while these things are happening just increased that unnerving feeling. I also feel that the “cosmic” part of the horror was more prominent in One Last Gasp. I only wish we had gotten more from the manor itself…above ground that is.
Writing: This is one area that I have to say the author greatly improved in A Song for the Void. Not that the writing was at all bad in One Last Gasp, but there’s a certain beauty to the writing in A Song for the Void. It almost feels poetic at times. I really enjoy the author’s writing. It feels very balanced, the words, sentences, structure, and dialogue. Nothing feels redundant or repetitive. One Last Gasp definitely has moments where there is some repetitiveness, but it’s very minor in my opinion. There are certain little hints in the way things are worded here and there that tip you off to things to come and it’s subtle. I love that.
Plot: This is another thing that I believe the author improved on between One Last Gasp and A Song for the Void. It’s important to note that the first is 500 pages and the latter is 331 pages. I go back and forth between saying that One Last Gasp should’ve been about 75-100 pages shorter and understanding that much would’ve been lost by cramping things together in 400ish pages or losing things altogether. I love a chunky book, but the beginning of One Last Gasp had a few dips where I was a little bored. However, I’m not enthusiastic about gun fights so that may have impacted my enjoyment there. Other than that, I think A Song for the Void was more evenly spaced out in climactic points and the increase in horror or suspense of those points over the course of the book. One Last Gasp had major climactic points, but not as well placed.
Intrigue: Something that I have really found enjoyable in these two books is the discussions and themes we find in each one. A Song for the Void has themes of grief and addiction and pain whereas One Last Gasp has themes of fear and war (obviously) and blind faith. I found both of these really intriguing and it kept me wanting to read more. It’s rare for me to find that sort of thought-provoking discussion in a horror novel that is done as well as this. It also didn’t escape me that each book features an embodiment of these themes in the horror itself. I’d also like to point out that each book has smaller discussions on racism and sexism. Those discussions are done really well, I think. It’s always a plus for me when an author writes from a male point of view and that character is respectful in those areas…even in an historical novel. Racism and sexism is expected in history, but I do not want to read from the point of view of someone who displays those things or doesn’t take a stand against those comments from other characters.
Logic: It’s difficult to really say what’s logical and what isn’t in cosmic horror…or any horror really. One Last Gasp definitely delves into the hows and whys more than A Song for the Void. In A Song for the Void, the cosmic parts simply are; they’re not really questioned much. In One Last Gasp, there are more questions and theories discussed between characters. I liked that. I found it more logical in One Last Gasp, but it is entirely possible that the ending monologue in A Song for the Void threw that enough for me to prefer One Last Gasp. Also on the topic of logic, the emotions and decisions of the characters, to me, felt more real in A Song for the Void. There were moments in One Last Gasp where it just fell short and felt a little unnatural.
Enjoyment: Even though I enjoyed both books for different reasons, I think A Song for the Void only gets the tiniest bit more because I read it first and it was the first of something like that I had read. With One Last Gasp, I knew, mostly, what to expect. I definitely enjoyed it, but the slightly slow bits brought it down just a tad and A Song for the Void’s writing brought it up just a tad. Literally, in CAWPILE, I gave them 9.71 and 9.73 respectively. I can’t wait for the third.