Dead Wrong is technically a sequel to last year’s Dead Inside, by well known crime fiction blogger and former probation officer Noelle Holten, but despite being set in the same world, and featuring some of the same characters, it is actually quite a different kind of story with an alternative heroine. It could easily be read as a stand-alone, although you would then be partially spoiled if you went back to the first book. This one is a much more typical police procedural, lacking the originality and dark emotion of Dead Inside, to which I had awarded five stars, and suffers by comparison.
DC Maggie Jamieson is a junior member of Stafford’s Homicide team, although you would not know it from the way she behaves. Two years earlier, she arrested a serial killer called Bill Raven, who was convicted based on his confession despite the lack of any bodies. Now severed limbs have been found belonging to his named victims but forensic evidence proves they died recently, so Raven cannot have committed the crime and has launched an appeal to be released, and the press are quick to attack Maggie for putting a supposedly innocent man in prison. Convinced of his guilt, Maggie, with the help of her friend and potential love interest psychologist Kate Moloney, must find the new killer before he can be released.
So, starting with the good, Holten writes very well, with atmospheric descriptions of creepy crime scenes and easy to follow sequences. The plot wasn’t too predictable - I didn’t guess who the guilty party would be, and I was certainly reeled in to keep reading to find out how it would turn out.
I was forewarned in other reviews of a cliff-hanger ending, which I normally dislike, but this was more of a hook right at the end to lead you into the next book - which is fine with me as it was actually heavily foreshadowed.
Unfortunately, I did have several issues with this book. First the implausibility of a DC being left to investigate such a major investigation, and then carry the can when it goes wrong - when you read this much crime fiction you can get the impression that every police force is investigating serial killers all the time, but they are in fact rare and I don’t believe that such a lowly ranked officer would’ve been the public face of the team. (I have no direct knowledge of the English police system, but have read enough to feel I have a reasonable sense of normal procedure. Admittedly some CF series have their DI as the person on the ground doing all the interviews which is not believable either.)
The pace was slowed down by frequent repetition as Maggie goes round in circles repeatedly visiting and then winding up Raven. The scenes featuring the victims also all seemed to be the same. Then chunks of time would be missed out - Maggie gets dressed up and goes out to a bar, but we don’t see any of this - no it’s not relevant to the plot but would’ve been more interesting to see her outside of work than reading about her drinking wine at home...
There’s a whole minor sub-plot about Maggie’s missing cat which goes nowhere and served only to raise my anxiety and make me lose all sympathy for her: I know I’m a more obsessive cat mother than normal, but for someone who claims to be fond of her pet, she does nothing but put up a few posters and then seems to forget all about him. Minor spoiler, he reappears, without explanation weeks later, with hints that Raven was somehow involved, and rather than being overjoyed, her reaction is sort of “ho-hum, oh there you are”... Not a way to endear a character to me (and a higher than average proportion of serious readers seem to like cats - just saying.)
I actually did like that Holten doesn’t make a big deal of Maggie’s bisexuality as it is unimportant to her role and seems normal that she would conceal it from her colleagues. The tension in the developing relationship with Kate felt realistic and not there for titillation. On the other hand, her brother is a shadowy background character who is not well developed - maybe he will be more prominent in the next book - and some of the other supporting characters are also paper thin, like poor PC Bethany who does all the grunt work and we don’t even know what she looks like. I would rather hear less about every single bloomin’ coffee that Maggie drinks, and have more descriptions of her colleagues’ looks, backgrounds, quirks and personalities!
Finally, a minor irritation was the overuse of police titles, and inconsistencies in how they are referred to: a couple of times early on to establish who’s who is fine, but Nathan is referred to as DS Nathan Wright repeatedly well into the book and Maggie’s boss changes from Abigail to DI Rutherford and back. In dialogue it seems right that rank be referred to as this is how they would refer to each other - unlike the American tendency to just use surnames - but you don’t need to patronise us by constantly reminding us who’s who. Conversely, several times there were acronyms for departments used without explanation that we are supposed to just guess at.
For all these criticisms, it’s not a bad book and these problems are readily fixable and, from all the 4 and 5 star reviews here, clearly not issues for other readers. I’m definitely keen to continue the series and find out what happens next (I’m pretty sure it’s not going to be what it looks like!) 3.5 rounded down.
Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the arc which allowed me to give an honest review. Dead Wrong is published on March 14th.