Some final thoughts here after reading Cost of Discipleship. I give it 4/5 stars, but I would almost rather knock it down to 3/5. However, I suspect that its worth grows on future re-readings. I hoped for better exposition of Scripture, but I was also very taken with Bonhoeffer's theological courage and often exacting pull-no-punches arguments. For brevity's sake, I'll leave my comments as an itemized list:
What about joy and resurrection? Bonhoeffer barely develops this central aspect of the disciple's life. He is overly glum about the whole Christian enterprise, despite his persistent emphasis on finding joy in Christ. If he has found such joy, where in the world is it? Why does it not leap off the page? To be fair, his context was perhaps part of the reason for this. He is reacting to a superficial progressivism, and perhaps he sees himself as a prophet instilling discipline upon would-be disciples of Christ in the face of a German church that seems incapable of divorcing itself from the growing Nazi culture. Still, we need to be wary of this emphasis, because I firmly believe that the present Western world needs to know much more about the joy of Christian life than a reminder of our persistent sinfulness. Furthermore, I think a stronger emphasis on the meaning of Christ's resurrection would balance out Bonhoeffer's treatment of death and sin. We do worship a God who has become incarnate in Jesus and crucified as the Messiah - but even more so, we worship a God who has been victorious over both of those conditions, that is, the frailty and dirtiness of human life and the torture of sin and death. That victory should be emphasized as something much more than a means to our own salvation. It is this, but it is also the dawning of a new world, the springtime after a very long winter, the very foretaste of unimaginable good things. (Thank God for NT Wright and his work in this area.)
Literalism. One more important concern or criticism I have of Bonhoeffer's book is that his hermeneutic is at times, well, amateurish. He literally interprets most of the Sermon on the Mount AND THEN a lot more. It is one thing to take Christ's words literally in a sermon that is probably intended to be taken mostly literally anyway. But it is quite another thing to continue in this vein throughout much of his further exploration of the sermon's themes. For example, in his interpretation of Christ's command to preach to Israel, not the Samaritans and Gentiles, he states that this shows that Christian disciples are to be 100% dependent on Christ's will and ideas, not their own. Well okay, I get your point, Dietrich, but I think you are pushing it too far. The passage does not spell this interpretation out, and your interpretation gives very little help to a Christian who might try to assume such determinism. What is to be the medium for such explicit divine instructions? Are we to constantly doubt ideas that seem to come from our own brains and wait for dreams or verbal instructions from God? I don't aim to disparage these avenues of divine communication, because I think they can be valid. However, Bonhoeffer's interpretation leaves us little to work with when it comes to the 99% of life in which God seems much more quiet and even at times silent. The lesson to be learned here is that Bonhoeffer is not the most critical thinker of Biblical texts. We should value his thoughts on culture much more than his reading of the Bible. I'm sure a lot of people might disagree, but given my knowledge of Biblical scholarship, I can't help but see the holes and lack of systematic, interpretive rigor in his writings.
The Task of the Church. This is the heart of Bonhoeffer's message, I think, and it is of great value. Once we establish that we are each individually and ultimately responsible before God, we need to take a step forward alongside our fellow disciples. We must embrace each other because it is in fact part of sanctification. He says that "by pursuing sanctification outside the Church, we are trying to pronounce ourselves holy." Such a pronouncement can only come from Christ, and this happens within the Body of Christ. (How mystic is this Body? Does it exist outside the walls of formal Christian communities?) Crucially, Bonhoeffer is writing about this at a time when the German church had grown limp and refused to turn away from the thrall of an idolatrous German nationalism. He is a theologian refocusing the task of the church amidst one of Christianity's most grievous abandonments of righteousness. This lends a credibility that is often missing from today's prevailing theologies of Western comfort. Bonhoeffer, I believe, has the spark of prophetic discernment and speech that can call the church, even now, out of periods of malaise. And while each person is ultimately responsible to God as an individual, we can, as the people of God, turn back to Him together, collectively, as the full body of Christ.