From the opening quote by Francis Bacon – “If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties,” – to the dramatic conclusion, Og Mandino’s The Christ Commission is a powerful speculative examination of the events leading up to Jesus of Nazareth’s crucifixion, death and resurrection. While most historians are willing to concede the identity of the so-called ‘historic Jesus’ and even accept some version of his final demise on a Roman cross, there are more than a few who either doubt, deny or remain ambivalent so far as His resurrection goes. And yet if you are a believer in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, the factual-ness, the truth, of His rising from the dead is the crux of the problem—if you’ll forgive the pun. If He didn’t rise from the dead—as He repeatedly said He would—His horrific death is still a grave injustice done an innocent man and beloved local teacher, but it remains an isolated event, only another in a long list of violent acts perpetrated by the Roman Republic/Empire during its long history.
Mandino’s book centers on a modern day mystery writer time struggling with his own doubts. In a move reminiscent of “It’s a Wonderful Life” he is given his wish to conduct an investigation—the Christ Commission—into the details surrounding Jesus’ final days. With Joseph of Arimathea as his guide, the main character, Matthias, time travels back to Jerusalem 6 years after the crucifixion and death of Jesus, A.D. 36.
Matthias then sets out to interview important ‘witnesses’ in a race against time. Since he is an actual person entering into that time period, he has to observe all the usual protocol about not altering history, etc., but he also has to deal with his own identity as a supposed Roman historian inquiring into a politically and religiously sensitive event which more than a few people would rather forget. Most of his findings and the words spoken by witnesses are the same as those we read today in the Gospels, even though the earliest account (The Gospel of Mark) wouldn’t be written for another 30 years.
There is some conjectural biblical exegesis which the author puts into the testimony of his characters. For example, a young (Jon) Mark (as he would still have been in A.D. 30) informs Matthias that he went to the tomb, found the stone rolled away, prayed and slept and then awoke as the women arrived to anoint the body. As he frightened them, they fled, however we are meant to discern from this conversation (between Matthias and Mark) that (Jon) Mark is the ‘young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a white robe’ (Mark 16:5) who tells the women, “Do not be amazed! You seek Jesus of Nazareth, the crucified. He has been raised; he is not here. Behold the place where they laid him. But go and tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him, as he told you.’” (Mark 16:6-7)
Still whether you accept or reject some of these explanations of the more minor mysteries concerning the resurrection, Mandino’s story is a compelling and detailed examination of the subject, especially for a work of fiction.