Here goes my essay...
If I was rating One For Sorrow purely on things such as the mystery, suspense, being thrilling, emotional, gripping, the (limited but done well) mixed media and the character development, and then disregarding one pretty key plot twist, this would be a 4 star rating.
That plot twist though could make it an easy 1 star. I'm going to land on 3 stars, but even that makes me cringe a bit for both ways! It deserves more for the most part, but I can't bring myself to do it and hesitate to even give it 3.
One For Sorrow is about nurse, Leah, who has started a new gig at a psychiatric facility. She has started over in a new town with her younger brother, Tom, after the death of her parents by murder-suicide by her abusive father.
At her new job, she is treating child murderer, Isabel, but doesn't believe Isabel to be guilty so she becomes obsessed with investigating the murder and crossing some big professional lines doing so.
Leah is also battling some psychological issues, turning to alcohol at times.
The plot is juicy, the characters are developed well and it was a good book (even if repetitive at times). I predicted the twist toward the end, but it didn't ruin it. There was just that one big twist half way through that spoiled it for me, cringing as I read the latter parts of the book which were unpleasant. It means I will not read book 2, despite wanting to know what happens and enjoying the author's work, because of the hard topic to read and because I assume it appears regularly (if you've read book 2, please let me know if it isn't).
Below are spoilers, including what the twist I refer to is to provide context to my review and in case people want to go in warned. Don't read on further if you don't want spoilers!!
****
*** Spoilers below ***
****
This issue I acknowledge is real, it happens, it is beyond devastating, but do I want to read it in fiction? No. Is it necessary in this book? Also, no (in my opinion). Is it good for a representation? Maybe, I am not sure and I don't hold it against the author for whatever the reasons may be, maybe shock value? Awareness? Don't know but it's not for me.
At about 56% into this, we find out that not only was Leah's dad abusive but also her brother Tom is, in addition to being her brother, also her son. Born when she was 13. For the remaining 44% of the book, we have references to her brother change to her son and the relationship of mother/son throughout.
I know it can happen, but for me reading fiction, I don't like it. One aspect I thought was because of subsequent parts of the book, the author may have chosen it to depict the love and "die for" attitude Leah has toward her son with maternal instincts. But to me, that is unnecessary.
The relationship before the twist, when we knew her as his older sister, was written so well she actually was a mother figure and the protection of a younger brother and the whole book in that respect would have worked and been just as good (well, better imo) if he was only her younger brother. As a sibling, all things that happened - I'd try protect my sisters the same way she protected her "son". So her being mother, it just isn't relevant to that either. There are other ways to write how bad abuse is.
As this made unpleasant each page that mentioned Leah and Tom, mother/son/brother because of how awful it is to think about, I wanted to 1 star it. But if I forget that part, it's a 4 star book. Unfortunately, assuming I'd be going into book 2 reading about Leah and Tom I'm going to have to pass on what I imagine is a really good sequel.