What do you think?
Rate this book
From Palassi to Partition and After
More than a survey, and much more than a thematically arranged narrative, this book is an eminently readable account of the emergence of India as a nation. It maps a wide and often complicated terrain of historical happenings, their main players in groups and as individuals, and contexts that enable us to see the formation of a nation through documents of resistance and struggle, assimilation and rejection.
712 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2004
308 people are currently reading
3522 people want to read
About the author
Sekhar Bandyopadhyay
26 books40 followersSekhar Bandyopadhyay is Senior Lecturer and Head of the History Programme, School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. His research interests include the social and political history of modern India, with special reference to Bengal.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 68 reviews
February 7, 2017
‘From Plassey to Partition and After’ is that rare unbiased book on modern India. Objective and comprehensive, it is the one and only book you need to read to grasp the complex contours of modern Indian history. What distinguishes it from other books is that the author Sekhar Bandyopadhyay is careful to treat modern Indian history as a site of intense contestation. He doesn’t thrust a particular narrative in your face, like Bipan Chandra pushes his Marxist nationalistic narrative of India’s freedom struggle in India’s Struggle for Independence. Rather, Bandyopadhyay recognizes that freedom meant different things for different socio-economic groups and furnishes a well-researched summary of various historiographical strands.
He also incorporates recent academic work on economic history and explains modern political developments in the context of material conditions, marking an illuminating shift from the usual personality & ideology centric approach to historical events. For instance, he writes that Pakistan was presented as a ‘peasant utopia’ to the peasants of East Bengal, which would liberate the Muslim peasantry from the hands of Hindu zamindars and moneylenders, thus representing a break from existing agrarian relations. He also writes about the balancing act Congress had to perform between indigenous capitalists and the working class. He writes that working class support for the Congress was, in general, weak – industrial workers in Bombay had meanwhile thrown in their lot with the Communists – with the exception of Bengal where their fight was against the British capitalists.
He also writes about how caste relations played a role in the success of Congress-led mass movements. In general, many 19th century peasant movements with a significant element of self-initiative were co-opted into the Non Cooperation Movement. Regions with no pre-history of peasant mobilization remained quiet during so-called ‘national’ movements. And regions with long-standing resentments often spiraled out of the hands of Congress leaders and turned violent. The movement was controlled and successful primarily in the region where dominant peasant communities such as the Mahishya caste in Bengal and Patidars in Gujarat held sway over lower caste agricultural labourers. Regions with more cross-caste mobilization, such as Awadh, tended to turn violent.
The book is a scholarly achievement, a task made all the more difficult by the proximity of the period under study. The only thing this book needs are some section headings between the relentless paragraphs. This will help the reader mentally categorize the various crisscrossing strands and combine them to harvest an accessible account of this complex period. This quibble aside, From Plassey to Partition is easily the most enlightening book on modern India I’ve read. Highly recommended!
He also incorporates recent academic work on economic history and explains modern political developments in the context of material conditions, marking an illuminating shift from the usual personality & ideology centric approach to historical events. For instance, he writes that Pakistan was presented as a ‘peasant utopia’ to the peasants of East Bengal, which would liberate the Muslim peasantry from the hands of Hindu zamindars and moneylenders, thus representing a break from existing agrarian relations. He also writes about the balancing act Congress had to perform between indigenous capitalists and the working class. He writes that working class support for the Congress was, in general, weak – industrial workers in Bombay had meanwhile thrown in their lot with the Communists – with the exception of Bengal where their fight was against the British capitalists.
He also writes about how caste relations played a role in the success of Congress-led mass movements. In general, many 19th century peasant movements with a significant element of self-initiative were co-opted into the Non Cooperation Movement. Regions with no pre-history of peasant mobilization remained quiet during so-called ‘national’ movements. And regions with long-standing resentments often spiraled out of the hands of Congress leaders and turned violent. The movement was controlled and successful primarily in the region where dominant peasant communities such as the Mahishya caste in Bengal and Patidars in Gujarat held sway over lower caste agricultural labourers. Regions with more cross-caste mobilization, such as Awadh, tended to turn violent.
The book is a scholarly achievement, a task made all the more difficult by the proximity of the period under study. The only thing this book needs are some section headings between the relentless paragraphs. This will help the reader mentally categorize the various crisscrossing strands and combine them to harvest an accessible account of this complex period. This quibble aside, From Plassey to Partition is easily the most enlightening book on modern India I’ve read. Highly recommended!
August 17, 2020
4.5/5 Phew ! And Wow ! This book starts with a brief discussion of the decline of the Mughal Empire during Aurangzeb's time and then describes the political situation in India when the Europeans started increasing their influence. Each of the major events has been analysed well. However, the best thing about this book was that it provided a variety of opinions by different scholars at every stage. Also, it was totally non-partisan and POVs of all parties have been presented well.
Purely for scholarship and information, the rating would be 5/5. However this was a bit dry and took me a couple of months.
Also, the chapter on India post-independence seemed rushed and could have been omitted.
Purely for scholarship and information, the rating would be 5/5. However this was a bit dry and took me a couple of months.
Also, the chapter on India post-independence seemed rushed and could have been omitted.
November 13, 2022
A deeply researched brilliant piece of work.
March 26, 2017
Indian history has generally been divided in three broad periods: Ancient – from the dawn of history to the coming of Islam; Medieval – Muslim rule up to the Mughal Empire and the Modern – the colonial rule under the British. Now that the British has left the subcontinent 70 years ago this period – “our times” – is considered post-colonial or Independent India.
Bandyopadhyay, who teaches history at the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, has covered, as the title suggests, the history of India from the coming of the British till they left.
In a broad sweep he has covered the coming of different European trading companies, their rivalry for foothold in the subcontinent, victory of the English company, gradual foray of the British from commercial activities to interference in the local administrations, Revolt of 1857, transfer of authority from the “Company Bahadur” to the Crown, growth of English education and, as a result, a questioning and scientific temper among the middle class, discontent among the educated Indians, rise of nationalism and its expression – both pacifist and violent, Gandhi, Hindu-Muslim alienation, vivisection of the country along communal lines and finally, Independence. By way of an additional chapter, Bandyopadhyay has discussed, in broad brush strokes, the major events and trends of the independent country – from the adoption of the Constitution to the coming of Narendra Modi.
Any reading of modern Indian history invariably leads to a feeling of profound sadness. A 5,000-year-old civilization – a country that is more an experiment in syncretism than a nation – finds itself broken in three parts as two major religious communities are led to believe that, after 1,000 years, they can no longer stay together as neighbours.
And at what price!
How do Pakistanis look at partition of the country and independence? As Bandyopadhyay has rightly pointed out: “For many Indians freedom thus came with a sense of loss caused by the partition, while to many Muslims in Pakistan, particularly to their state ideologues, partition itself meant freedom.”
After 70 years everyone agrees that the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are entitled to enjoy their freedom and build their countries as they wish.
But clearly the bitterness persists – to the detriment of all of us.
All of us – Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis – must realize that mutual recrimination will not take us anywhere.
Whether BJP’s (read Narendra Modi’s) massive victory in Uttar Pradesh indicates polarization along communal lines or rise of aspirational India and regression of social divisiveness is a question time will answer.
Some commentators have argued that Pakistan’s obsession to portray itself as an extension of Arabia and consequent negation/denial of its own 5,000-year-old history is a cultural hara-kiri that the subcontinent can ill afford (see Singh, Bhopinder, “Pakistan Disowns History”, The Statesman, Kolkata, 9 March 2017).
If a country as gentle as Bangladesh falls prey to the Jihadism of the Islamic State variety it will be everybody’s loss.
In the new millennium we have far deadlier demons to fight and defeat – population explosion, climate change, ecological degradation, malevolent and deadly use of technology and weapons of mass destruction, income inequality, dwindling natural resources, water scarcity and what you have. And it’s a battle we are all in together.
At least we should.
If history teaches us to look forward to the future with experience as our guide, books like Bandyopadhyay’s serves as important markers.
A signal contribution to the study of modern Indian history.
Bandyopadhyay, who teaches history at the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, has covered, as the title suggests, the history of India from the coming of the British till they left.
In a broad sweep he has covered the coming of different European trading companies, their rivalry for foothold in the subcontinent, victory of the English company, gradual foray of the British from commercial activities to interference in the local administrations, Revolt of 1857, transfer of authority from the “Company Bahadur” to the Crown, growth of English education and, as a result, a questioning and scientific temper among the middle class, discontent among the educated Indians, rise of nationalism and its expression – both pacifist and violent, Gandhi, Hindu-Muslim alienation, vivisection of the country along communal lines and finally, Independence. By way of an additional chapter, Bandyopadhyay has discussed, in broad brush strokes, the major events and trends of the independent country – from the adoption of the Constitution to the coming of Narendra Modi.
Any reading of modern Indian history invariably leads to a feeling of profound sadness. A 5,000-year-old civilization – a country that is more an experiment in syncretism than a nation – finds itself broken in three parts as two major religious communities are led to believe that, after 1,000 years, they can no longer stay together as neighbours.
And at what price!
How do Pakistanis look at partition of the country and independence? As Bandyopadhyay has rightly pointed out: “For many Indians freedom thus came with a sense of loss caused by the partition, while to many Muslims in Pakistan, particularly to their state ideologues, partition itself meant freedom.”
After 70 years everyone agrees that the Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are entitled to enjoy their freedom and build their countries as they wish.
But clearly the bitterness persists – to the detriment of all of us.
All of us – Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis – must realize that mutual recrimination will not take us anywhere.
Whether BJP’s (read Narendra Modi’s) massive victory in Uttar Pradesh indicates polarization along communal lines or rise of aspirational India and regression of social divisiveness is a question time will answer.
Some commentators have argued that Pakistan’s obsession to portray itself as an extension of Arabia and consequent negation/denial of its own 5,000-year-old history is a cultural hara-kiri that the subcontinent can ill afford (see Singh, Bhopinder, “Pakistan Disowns History”, The Statesman, Kolkata, 9 March 2017).
If a country as gentle as Bangladesh falls prey to the Jihadism of the Islamic State variety it will be everybody’s loss.
In the new millennium we have far deadlier demons to fight and defeat – population explosion, climate change, ecological degradation, malevolent and deadly use of technology and weapons of mass destruction, income inequality, dwindling natural resources, water scarcity and what you have. And it’s a battle we are all in together.
At least we should.
If history teaches us to look forward to the future with experience as our guide, books like Bandyopadhyay’s serves as important markers.
A signal contribution to the study of modern Indian history.
September 17, 2020
Very good!
March 21, 2019
Pretty decent textbook for the period covering from the 18th century to India's recent history. Disliked the last chapter dealing with India's history after independence. From what I understand the author added it for the second edition as people complained the book ended too abruptly at independence. Unfortunately, he did not manage to do justice to it. Half of the chapter just deals with the nehruvian era (till 1964) and overall has a very rushed feeling. Otherwise the book is quite decent.
While other books have focused on giving a broad outline of India's modern history by focusing on the freedom struggle, the author brings in the story of the communities who were fighting for greater rights for themselves besides freedom from the British. Examples include the struggle for women's rights, struggles by untouchables, communal frictions etc. He uses the latest research in modern Indian historiography to expand on the reasons for the success of the Congress and Mahatma Gandhi's attractiveness to so many people (while Gandhi was highly respected by most Indians, author shows how he was a figurehead whose messages were re-interpreted by the protesters to fit their needs rather than followed in the literal sense). Book shows how many of the Congress' most successful movements were not begun by them. Instead they were local led movements which, after they had reached some success, were led by the Congress. In short, instead of a top down history, the author attempts to look at the different cacophony of voices which were part of the fabric of Indian history, while at the same time giving a very good broad outline of its movement towards freedom.
While other books have focused on giving a broad outline of India's modern history by focusing on the freedom struggle, the author brings in the story of the communities who were fighting for greater rights for themselves besides freedom from the British. Examples include the struggle for women's rights, struggles by untouchables, communal frictions etc. He uses the latest research in modern Indian historiography to expand on the reasons for the success of the Congress and Mahatma Gandhi's attractiveness to so many people (while Gandhi was highly respected by most Indians, author shows how he was a figurehead whose messages were re-interpreted by the protesters to fit their needs rather than followed in the literal sense). Book shows how many of the Congress' most successful movements were not begun by them. Instead they were local led movements which, after they had reached some success, were led by the Congress. In short, instead of a top down history, the author attempts to look at the different cacophony of voices which were part of the fabric of Indian history, while at the same time giving a very good broad outline of its movement towards freedom.
May 20, 2012
probably the best documented book i have ever read.i am surprised by the depth of knowledge of sekhar bandyopadhyay.the guy is truly genius.but one has to himself give his own verdict as every school of thought has its own belief.
July 23, 2021
Informative indeed. Well documented history of India starting from British raj to partition.
September 6, 2016
There are many books on India's Independence struggle written by both indigenous and foreign authors, what, however, differentiates this one from others is the incorporation of various view points from all the schools of thought, which is typically hard to find these days. Take for example, the Reform movement in India in the 18th and 19th century. There are books that seriously take ideological positions like for example, the nationalist school of thought having a Right-wing leanings will glorify Arya Samaj movement by Dayanand Saraswati for revival of Hinduism, especially its campaign for Gau Rakshas, where as the Marxist school of thought goes on to credit it with creating a communal atmosphere in the country that ultimately resulted in the partition. Bandopadhyaya treats this subject with utmost care by putting forward the views of not just these schools but also various like the Cambridge and subaltern, first, and then diagnoses the impact so as to measure the importance of Arya Samaj itself. The language too is not filled with academic jargons, which makes an easy read for a non-academic as well. Since, the book almost takes a neutral position on many debates and issues (except for issues on Women and labor), it becomes a must read for any history student or a general public interested in history.
March 23, 2021
Excellent, organized, detailed, thorough.
Author's work contains most concise details of India from Plassey to Partition.
Sekhar quotes leading authors in South Asia. I am familiar with their work.
As I read this work, I learnt new things.
Many Indian educated class, had to reframe their schools of thought in Indian context eg: Raja Ram Mohan Roy's work.
This brings, the question for religious traditions -- It has to answer questions of the current culture and age?
There were two currents within British Politics- Utilitarianism and Evangelicalism.
They shaped policies of British Raj.
I learnt the draining of wealth theory.
Basically, the thesis is that British rule took all the wealth of Indians.
This is popular among pro-India folks.
This was put forward by -- Dadabhai Naoroji, a successful businessman, Justice M.G. Ranade and R.C. Dutt, a retired JCS officer, who published, The Economic History of India in two volumes.
In Gandhi, many shared common values like non-violence, not against capitalism.
Everyone had something in common with him. Thus, he appealed to the masses.
Contrary to what most lay folks talk in conversation, i.e British came to conquer.
They were more interested in trade. This is self-evident.
I would recommend this to anyone interested in Indian History.
Deus Vult,
Gottfried
Author's work contains most concise details of India from Plassey to Partition.
Sekhar quotes leading authors in South Asia. I am familiar with their work.
As I read this work, I learnt new things.
Many Indian educated class, had to reframe their schools of thought in Indian context eg: Raja Ram Mohan Roy's work.
This brings, the question for religious traditions -- It has to answer questions of the current culture and age?
There were two currents within British Politics- Utilitarianism and Evangelicalism.
They shaped policies of British Raj.
I learnt the draining of wealth theory.
Basically, the thesis is that British rule took all the wealth of Indians.
This is popular among pro-India folks.
This was put forward by -- Dadabhai Naoroji, a successful businessman, Justice M.G. Ranade and R.C. Dutt, a retired JCS officer, who published, The Economic History of India in two volumes.
In Gandhi, many shared common values like non-violence, not against capitalism.
Everyone had something in common with him. Thus, he appealed to the masses.
Contrary to what most lay folks talk in conversation, i.e British came to conquer.
They were more interested in trade. This is self-evident.
I would recommend this to anyone interested in Indian History.
Deus Vult,
Gottfried
September 15, 2023
A very descriptive account of history of India dating back from Mughal Raj till the present times of BJP government rule (as of 2014) in India.
I have not read other history books of India yet (and let's say the history I studied in school time is much fuzzy to me presently in my 30s), so I can't comment on the genuinity of all the facts presented. But surely, even I can see that the book is very well researched.
The details are thorough; touching each aspect of our history that has shaped our nation as we know it today, be it religional or economical or societal or cultural or colonial aspect.
The details of partition were the most harrowing for me to read, as they hit personally home to me since my grandparents were a part of mass migration in partitions, leaving their lands and homes and starting over in life in the place I call home today.
A must read this book is. One needs a lot of patience though to read it.
And if you're not a major history buff like me, take a light book and read that too alongside for a mood shift. But do read this one indeed to know roots of India in and out! 🇮🇳
I have not read other history books of India yet (and let's say the history I studied in school time is much fuzzy to me presently in my 30s), so I can't comment on the genuinity of all the facts presented. But surely, even I can see that the book is very well researched.
The details are thorough; touching each aspect of our history that has shaped our nation as we know it today, be it religional or economical or societal or cultural or colonial aspect.
The details of partition were the most harrowing for me to read, as they hit personally home to me since my grandparents were a part of mass migration in partitions, leaving their lands and homes and starting over in life in the place I call home today.
A must read this book is. One needs a lot of patience though to read it.
And if you're not a major history buff like me, take a light book and read that too alongside for a mood shift. But do read this one indeed to know roots of India in and out! 🇮🇳
October 20, 2016
বাংলায় লেখা কোন বই পড়তে আমার সাধারনত খুব বেশি সময় লাগেনা। একটা ৫০০ পৃষ্ঠার বই টানা পড়লে ৮-১০ ঘন্টার (একটু কম বেশী হতে পারে বইয়ের ধরন অনুযায়ী) বেশী সময় নেই না। এটাই মনে হয় একমাত্র বই যা পড়তে আমি এত সময় নিয়েছি। পুরো এক সপ্তাহ ধরে পড়ছি। ঐতিহাসিক ঘটনা নিয়ে লেখা বই বা প্রবন্ধ টাইপ বইগুলো সাধারনত বোরিং হয়। দুই চার পাতা পড়ে আর পড়তে ইচ্ছে করে না। কিন্তু এটা আমি গোগ্রাসে গিলেছি। আধুনিক ভারতের ইতিহাস, মুঘল শাসন, ক্ষমতা ও রাজনৈতিক পট পরিবর্তন, দেশ বিভাগ নিয়ে এত সমৃদ্ধ ও তথ্যমূলক বই আমি আগে আর পড়িনি। বইয়ের শুরুতেই মুঘল সম্রাজ্যের আভ্যন্তরীন বিভেদ, পতন ও একই সমান্তরালে উপমহাদেশে ব্রিটিশ শাসনের উত্থানের বিশদ বর্ণনা রয়েছে। উপমহাদেশে ব্রিটিশ শাসন থেকে শুরু করে দুটি স্বাধীন, সার্বভৌম রাষ্ট্রের জন্ম অবধি ঘটে যাওয়া গুরুত্বপূর্ন ঘটনাসমূহের স্বচ্ছ ও নিরেট বর্ণনা রয়েছে এই বইতে। ইতিহাস নিয়ে কৌতুহলী পাঠকদেরকে চুম্বকের মত টেনে রাখার মত অনেককিছু রয়েছে এই বইতে। একটা সুবিধা হল বইয়ে প্রতিটি ঘটনা চ্যাপ্টার অনুযায়ি ভাগ করে দেয়া আছে, এত বিশাল বই পড়তে বিরক্ত লাগলে যে কেউ তার পছন্দের বিষয়টা অনায়াসে চ্যাপ্টার দেখে পরে নিতে পারেন, তবে একটা অসুবিধা এই যে, ইতিহাস বর্ণনায় লেখক খুব গভীরে যাননি, ফলে ঘটনাগুলো কেমন যেন ছাড়া ছাড়া মনে হয়েছে। শেষ হয়েও শেষ হইলো না টাইপ। ওভারঅল ভালো লেগছে। অবশ্যই পাঁচ তারা।
December 24, 2022
I like this book not gonna lie. I am writing the review from the perspective of a graduate student. It's informative easier to get content but sometimes the topics are made too complicated. Like that unit on social and religious reforms, you keep on reading the same paragraph but it doesn't makes sense and there is too much detailing given to the unnecessary stuff. Same with the gandhi unit like you don't get the main point of the unit it's just too much unnecessary details and going in circles. Also the language of this book might not be suitable for everyone it uses heavy vocab in some places which makes you go and Google their meaning. I mean in a sense it's initiating learning but on the other hand sometimes it gets too frustrating. I don't know if book can be revised but it's the best one out here atm if you want to learn about modern india.
July 10, 2020
Well researched and balanced throughout the narration. Must read for readers want to read modern Indian history with a deeper sociological and political perspective. But the writer does not quote primary resources in the reference that brings the major flaw in the reliability and research of the book.
June 6, 2019
Typical history book which give proper scenario of independence how it start , the process of independence and how constitution demand proposed and how Indian achieve freedom from the Britishers ....the language of the book is simple and easily understandable compare to Bipin Chandr.
September 30, 2013
what differentiates this from the others is the fact that for every incident the reactions of several authors are discussed. So in one place you get all the points required for analysis.
October 31, 2015
Insightful, detailed, amazing.
July 3, 2020
This book is a study in eclecticism which travels through time to the pluralist Indian society and nation-state as we know today. The British Raj is at the center of Indian historiography vacillating between evangelic, liberal, orientalist and conservative ideologies which where expressed through the "Apparatus of British Rule", namely army, ICS, Judicial system, Council of directors, Board of Control. The East India Company after the Battle of Palashi (anglicized Plassey) didn't overtly defy the dwindling Mughal empire's suzerainty over Bengal rather than installed its ministers in the Mir Jafar's state council. This policy was expanded to other acquired princely states in the Indian subcontinent as the East India company's expansionist policy resulted in territorial gains.
Land taxation policy became the substantial source of money in the British treasury which was reformed regionally to increase the collection pushing the poor peasants into a state of abject poverty. Permanent settlement, Ryotwari and Mahalwari system each had distinct characteristics but otherwise all promoted an ever increasing tax demands through zamindari or other local landed aristocracy invoking variegated responses from the oppressed classes.
"Colonial constructs" are principles along which any group can rally around but the principles are inherently created by the colonial masters. The author deals with many such constructs which shaped the Indian perception on number of issues, namely modern state, civilizations, etc. These constructs resulted in an inward retrospective look which culminated, albeit surreptitiously into Hindu revivalism, tribal insurgencies, Muslim alienation, Dalit and women oppression.
The revolt of 1857 was a watershed moment in the Indian history. The Charter Act of 1858 placed the Indian state under the direct control of the British Crown, the disrupting policies Lord Dalhousie like doctrine of lapse etc. were terminated and the Mughal dynasty was invalidated. The lack of leadership in the revolt was evident from the random spurt of violence across north India, although south India remained largely peaceful. The revolt was also epochal in the change of British perception towards Indians who were now looked upon with contempt and beyond reformation.
The humble beginnings Of Congress in 1885 as a debating club following constitutionalism didn't consider the cessation of British rule in India. The elitist, land owning, patriarchal, Brahamanical organization was really constrained in its perception, plan and reach which changed only with the arrival of Mahatma Gandhi. The polyphonic nationalism that India experienced was manifested in the large number of organizations during the late 19th and early 20th century, namely Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Congress, Muslim league, Unionist party, communist party, Hindu mahasabha, Kisan sabha, Akali Dal, etc.
The reforms initiated by liberal governments like Montagu Chelmsford prepared the ground for the ultimate dream of self rule of Indian Swarajists. The instrumental ability with which Gandhi navigated such varying political landscape during non-cooperation movements, civil disobedience movements and countless Satyagraha campaigns are appreciated by a number of historians, anthropologists in the book.
The debate on Partition has now changed from the causes to the aftermath suffered by the people as onlookers, aggressors and victims of communal riots which transpired across the Indian subcontinent.The book argues that Indian nation-state was not created but formed which is still plagued by the civic and ethnic discourses of its citizenry.
Land taxation policy became the substantial source of money in the British treasury which was reformed regionally to increase the collection pushing the poor peasants into a state of abject poverty. Permanent settlement, Ryotwari and Mahalwari system each had distinct characteristics but otherwise all promoted an ever increasing tax demands through zamindari or other local landed aristocracy invoking variegated responses from the oppressed classes.
"Colonial constructs" are principles along which any group can rally around but the principles are inherently created by the colonial masters. The author deals with many such constructs which shaped the Indian perception on number of issues, namely modern state, civilizations, etc. These constructs resulted in an inward retrospective look which culminated, albeit surreptitiously into Hindu revivalism, tribal insurgencies, Muslim alienation, Dalit and women oppression.
The revolt of 1857 was a watershed moment in the Indian history. The Charter Act of 1858 placed the Indian state under the direct control of the British Crown, the disrupting policies Lord Dalhousie like doctrine of lapse etc. were terminated and the Mughal dynasty was invalidated. The lack of leadership in the revolt was evident from the random spurt of violence across north India, although south India remained largely peaceful. The revolt was also epochal in the change of British perception towards Indians who were now looked upon with contempt and beyond reformation.
The humble beginnings Of Congress in 1885 as a debating club following constitutionalism didn't consider the cessation of British rule in India. The elitist, land owning, patriarchal, Brahamanical organization was really constrained in its perception, plan and reach which changed only with the arrival of Mahatma Gandhi. The polyphonic nationalism that India experienced was manifested in the large number of organizations during the late 19th and early 20th century, namely Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Congress, Muslim league, Unionist party, communist party, Hindu mahasabha, Kisan sabha, Akali Dal, etc.
The reforms initiated by liberal governments like Montagu Chelmsford prepared the ground for the ultimate dream of self rule of Indian Swarajists. The instrumental ability with which Gandhi navigated such varying political landscape during non-cooperation movements, civil disobedience movements and countless Satyagraha campaigns are appreciated by a number of historians, anthropologists in the book.
The debate on Partition has now changed from the causes to the aftermath suffered by the people as onlookers, aggressors and victims of communal riots which transpired across the Indian subcontinent.The book argues that Indian nation-state was not created but formed which is still plagued by the civic and ethnic discourses of its citizenry.
June 29, 2023
Title: A Scholarly Journey through Modern India: "From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India"
"From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India" is an indispensable and comprehensive work by Sekhar Bandyopadhyay, providing a detailed account of the history of modern India from the Battle of Plassey to the aftermath of Partition. Bandyopadhyay's meticulous research, balanced analysis, and engaging narrative make this book an essential resource for scholars, students, and anyone seeking a deep understanding of India's journey through the colonial era and its subsequent struggle for independence.
One of the notable strengths of this book is its extensive coverage of the historical events, political developments, and socio-cultural changes that shaped modern India. Bandyopadhyay explores various aspects of India's history, including the impact of British colonization, the growth of nationalist movements, the role of key political figures, and the challenges faced during the partition and independence process. His attention to detail and inclusion of multiple perspectives ensure a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of India's complex history.
The author's writing style is scholarly yet accessible, making the book engaging for both experts and general readers. Bandyopadhyay adeptly presents complex historical concepts and arguments in a clear and concise manner, providing readers with a solid understanding of the subject matter. The inclusion of maps, photographs, and other visual aids further enriches the reading experience and enhances the comprehension of the events and geographical context.
Bandyopadhyay's objective and balanced approach to historiography is commendable. He avoids falling into the trap of presenting a one-sided narrative and instead incorporates diverse viewpoints, allowing readers to form their own interpretations. The author critically examines the complexities of India's history, delving into the socio-economic disparities, religious tensions, and political dilemmas that shaped the nation's trajectory.
While the book covers a vast expanse of time and events, some readers may find certain sections to be more detailed or dense than others. Additionally, a deeper exploration of certain topics, such as the cultural and literary movements during the independence struggle, could have added further depth and context to the narrative.
In conclusion, "From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India" is an essential and enlightening read for anyone interested in the history of India. Sekhar Bandyopadhyay's scholarly approach, comprehensive research, and engaging writing style make this book a valuable resource. It provides a rich understanding of the complexities and challenges faced by India during its journey towards independence and beyond. Whether you are a historian, a student, or a curious reader, this book will undoubtedly broaden your knowledge and appreciation of India's fascinating and intricate history.
"From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India" is an indispensable and comprehensive work by Sekhar Bandyopadhyay, providing a detailed account of the history of modern India from the Battle of Plassey to the aftermath of Partition. Bandyopadhyay's meticulous research, balanced analysis, and engaging narrative make this book an essential resource for scholars, students, and anyone seeking a deep understanding of India's journey through the colonial era and its subsequent struggle for independence.
One of the notable strengths of this book is its extensive coverage of the historical events, political developments, and socio-cultural changes that shaped modern India. Bandyopadhyay explores various aspects of India's history, including the impact of British colonization, the growth of nationalist movements, the role of key political figures, and the challenges faced during the partition and independence process. His attention to detail and inclusion of multiple perspectives ensure a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of India's complex history.
The author's writing style is scholarly yet accessible, making the book engaging for both experts and general readers. Bandyopadhyay adeptly presents complex historical concepts and arguments in a clear and concise manner, providing readers with a solid understanding of the subject matter. The inclusion of maps, photographs, and other visual aids further enriches the reading experience and enhances the comprehension of the events and geographical context.
Bandyopadhyay's objective and balanced approach to historiography is commendable. He avoids falling into the trap of presenting a one-sided narrative and instead incorporates diverse viewpoints, allowing readers to form their own interpretations. The author critically examines the complexities of India's history, delving into the socio-economic disparities, religious tensions, and political dilemmas that shaped the nation's trajectory.
While the book covers a vast expanse of time and events, some readers may find certain sections to be more detailed or dense than others. Additionally, a deeper exploration of certain topics, such as the cultural and literary movements during the independence struggle, could have added further depth and context to the narrative.
In conclusion, "From Plassey to Partition and After: A History of Modern India" is an essential and enlightening read for anyone interested in the history of India. Sekhar Bandyopadhyay's scholarly approach, comprehensive research, and engaging writing style make this book a valuable resource. It provides a rich understanding of the complexities and challenges faced by India during its journey towards independence and beyond. Whether you are a historian, a student, or a curious reader, this book will undoubtedly broaden your knowledge and appreciation of India's fascinating and intricate history.
December 2, 2019
Apart from reading from ncert textbook and maybe for preparation for competitive examinations, this is the first time i have gone into details about British rule and our struggle for independence.
Some of the modern issues such as anti cow slaughter agitations, religion extremisms, role of bhim and ram sena types of group, caste based partiality, untouchability are not new to our nation. These have been in existence since last 200-300 years. Still we haven't been able to solve these completely.
The writer instead of asserting his opinions, tried to put up an impartial views on what happened and role of various people and organisations.
The kind of research put into authoring this book is immense and i cant imagine anyone collecting so much data for a book. The bibliography itself had around 30-40 pages.
I hope these types of material may be taught at school level. It's a fact that history repeats itself and if we know about it we can always tackle the issues.
I recommend this book to everyone specially school children if the language can be made little bit simpler.
Giving it a much deserved 5 star although it was a slow read.
Some of the modern issues such as anti cow slaughter agitations, religion extremisms, role of bhim and ram sena types of group, caste based partiality, untouchability are not new to our nation. These have been in existence since last 200-300 years. Still we haven't been able to solve these completely.
The writer instead of asserting his opinions, tried to put up an impartial views on what happened and role of various people and organisations.
The kind of research put into authoring this book is immense and i cant imagine anyone collecting so much data for a book. The bibliography itself had around 30-40 pages.
I hope these types of material may be taught at school level. It's a fact that history repeats itself and if we know about it we can always tackle the issues.
I recommend this book to everyone specially school children if the language can be made little bit simpler.
Giving it a much deserved 5 star although it was a slow read.
March 17, 2018
It's not an easy book to read but definitely compulsory to have a more scholarly understanding of history of modern India. However the book also assumes that you are already familiar with the basic trajectory of this period of Indian history, therefore the amount of historiography and theoretical discussions can become confusing for a student starting on Modern Indian history. Nonetheless I recommend this book for graduate level history studies as it gives students the right level of understanding of historical research and methods within the scope of Modern India.
November 8, 2019
One purpose of the Fort William College was to prevent the spread of the ideas of freedom preached by the French Revolution.
Whowoulddthunkk. This is a slow long read. It is a text book. So do not venture if you are not interested in history. But it is loaded with amazing insights into the formation of our country. The first reading is like just reading the index. Now you know what is where. Will have to come back to it again and again.
"Bardoli lifted Gandhi out of depression" and the Calcutta Congress of December 1928 witnessed his re-emergence as a national leader.
Whowoulddthunkk. This is a slow long read. It is a text book. So do not venture if you are not interested in history. But it is loaded with amazing insights into the formation of our country. The first reading is like just reading the index. Now you know what is where. Will have to come back to it again and again.
"Bardoli lifted Gandhi out of depression" and the Calcutta Congress of December 1928 witnessed his re-emergence as a national leader.
February 6, 2020
One of the most detailed and unbiased accounts of modern Indian history. The author has also taken the trouble to substantiate his take on debateable aspects by those of other historians, along with an account of contrary views. Thus allowing the reader to explore various perspectives which is imperative for a history student. The book does not feel dry at all and can be really engrossing for those interested in the subject.
February 17, 2020
What I liked most about the book is that it is not straight forward narration of events but it combines perspective of different historians and still makes the case for the general public. It definitely filled many voids of my modern historical knowledge and made my perspective broader for events happend during the independence struggle. Greater emphasis is on peasants depicting British rule affected them and how they reacted to it.
January 26, 2021
Fantabulous!The book offers complete clarity on sequence of events that lead to independence,partition and formation of republic of India.Author's analysis nicely coupled with the differences of opinion from other historians .This would enable readers to evaluate and develop an unbiased perspective.Paper quality could have been better.However,since the content is so intriguing and the pricing of the book is optimized,we need to ingnore this part.
August 25, 2021
An authoritative, unbiased and comprehensive account of Indian Freedom Struggle. The author has tried to cover almost all aspects, viewpoints and opinions encompassing various schools of thoughts like the Cambridge, Nationalists, Subalterns and Marxists. The narrative is immaculately balanced without tilting towards any particular ideology. Highly recommended to anyone who wants to understand India.
December 20, 2021
Sekhar hails from the Bengal,one of the most fertile region in world .So this book is having deep realistic feelings.East India Company got area around Kolkata at the end of 17th century.Within 60 years it made such climate of chaos in eastern India which made Nawab of Bengal insecure.An socio-political background of battle of Plassey and buxar is well depicted in first part.Being a merchantile power in pre modern era,Britain did all efforts to
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
October 19, 2019
Very well laid contours of the modern Indian history right from Royal Charter to Independence. Interesting analysis of economic history in the context of role played by Congress to balance interests of capitalists and working class, each having different interpretation of freedom.
September 29, 2021
Fantastic read , upon reading you will know about what were the conditions under which British EIC came to India as trading company and took over. How India fought for her independence and many events and personalities in between.
February 10, 2022
A concise summary of modern Indian history. Incorporation of viewpoints from various historians makes the read worthwhile. Would recommend it to anyone interested in delving into the fine prints of events that shaped India as a Nation.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 68 reviews