This was a very good read. Easy to follow, interesting, illuminating in many aspects, and mostly well-rendered analysis. There were some head-scratching assertions a time or two, but for the most part this was well-researched and articulated reasoning on numerous topics, from the obvious role of female heroes to the not-so-readily embraced role emotion, virtue, and truth play in heroism (regardless of gender).
There is much I agree with here on the defining of heroics and the impact of heroes, but I'll touch on two things that struck me profoundly. First, there are some very direct sections/pages that directly offer insight and great illumination on two of my own characters, heroes I've been writing about and exploring for a few years. While I was reading this and enjoying it, when I hit these sections that so immediately reflected my guys and my/their motivations and aspirations, it was very personally cool. I had planned on giving this book to a friend, but I ended up writing all over in the margins! Talk about learning more about one's self and characters - this was very exciting.
Second, however, is the very strange history of psychology I learned of. It's difficult to articulate clearly without going into giant essay mode and I don't wish to do that here, but suffice to say, even with understanding the history of the fight for women's rights from voting to employment to military service, I was shocked to discover that even in the study of the mind, psychologists did not deem it important/interesting/whatever to study the female mind. WTF? It is one thing to disregard the equality or value of another human (and I'm only putting it this way to be brief), but to acknowledge humanity but have zero interest in the working of the brain simply because it was not male?!??! I frankly don't understand, even if we stick strictly to scientific thought, how can a scientist not be interested in determining differences and similarities? Again, WTF!
This concept statement toward the close "Research suggests that there is a thin line between being perceived as a hero and being seen as a villain; individuals afford heroes little leniency when they exhibit flaws or engage in something perceived as immoral and have little trouble blaming them for it." sums my thoughts on the eternal struggle of mankind to clamor for heroes while our search to hold them high or drag them low ebbs and flows with the current societal norms. Norms that currently I believe love to despise heroes and to drag them into the dark and grime them with our despondency. Heroes should be better, should be beacons, should be bold - but we should encourage their betterment, reflect their shine, and praise their boldness. The deal works both ways - and we get the heroes we deserve.