A classic and indispensable account of graphic design history from the Industrial Revolution to the present
Now in its third edition, this acclaimed survey explores the evolution of graphic design from the 19th century to the present day. Following an exploration of design’s prehistory in ancient civilizations through the Industrial Revolution, author Stephen J. Eskilson argues that modern design as we know it grew out of the influence of Victorian-age reformers. He traces the emergence of modernist design styles in the early 20th century, examining the wartime politicization of regional styles. Richly contextualized chapters chronicle the history of the Bauhaus and the rise of the International Style in the 1950s and ’60s, and the postmodern movement of the 1970s and ’80s.
Contemporary considerations bring the third edition up to date, with discussions of app design, social media, emojis, big data visualization, and the use of animated graphics in film and television. The contemporary phenomenon of the citizen designer, professionals who address societal issues either through or in addition to their commercial work, is also addressed, highlighting protagonists like Bruce Mau and the Center for Urban Pedagogy. This edition also features 45 additional images, an expanded introduction and epilogue, and revised text throughout. A newly redesigned interior reinforces the fresh contents of this now-classic volume.
I feel that it is probably best to pick and choose the areas that interest you rather than reading it cover-to-cover.
The layout was very stale, funny since its supposed to be a book on graphic design. He fails to explain the relevance of many of his examples and few of them have the photo and description on the same page so you can see what he's talking about. Other examples he provides contain too much unnecessary detail that you can clearly see in the graphics.
It is definitely a nice reference to have around though. No complaints there.
A comprehensive and surprisingly readable look at the history of graphic design (loosely defined as printing press to present). The book is a richly illustrated, which makes it a bit unwieldy, and I think the chapters on recent graphic design (post-Internet) are a bit on the weak side as they lack the depth and perspective of the earlier sections. Still an interesting and thorough look at graphic design and its intersections with art, politics, commerce, etc.
Still reading this, but I wanted to comment on how political Graphic Design is. Not just in symbolism, but in the people who designed, the audiences, and the buyers.
William Morris was allied with Communism because he saw industrialization as a threat to English arts and Crafts. Aubrey Beardsley, a key Art Nouveau artist and friend of Oscar Wilde, was beloved for his "erotic" art style until his association with Oscar Wilde reframed the nature of his art to his audiences- and his buyers. He was fired from his job designing covers for the Yellow book, and his career was annihilated.
I like this book, but do not love it. It covers the Western world well, but really does not talk about the world as a whole - graphic design is everywhere. I use this as a textbook in class and supplement it with design from around the world and ask my students to also find other examples of good design from other countries.
Disclaimer: I've never read a book on the history of graphic design before, so I have nothing to compare to.
However, I have read several art history books, and know that they can be quite dry. This wasn't. I didn't read the whole book cover to cover, but rather jumped around, and I enjoyed it. I liked how it grouped the different design/designers by style rather than just following a strict timeline, and I also liked that there seemed to be equal parts text and images, so you could actually see and understand better what the author was talking about. Sometimes you have to flip back and forth between the pages to see the text and the accompanying example, but that didn't really bother me.
The thing I liked about this book is that instead of doing a strictly timeline approach to graphic design history it chooses to group things by stylistic movements. Some chapters were awkward in how movements were paired off strictly by timeline relationships. Another downside was that a large portion of the graphics were not on the same page as the text that elaborated them was causing the reader to flip back and forth repeatedly. Overall, it was an interesting read about the movements that shaped what we see in graphic design today.
(3/5) I sure learned a lot reading this, but even for a textbook, this was painfully boring to get through. Sometimes a bit...odd with how it approached diversity in design & slacked on introducing diverse designers in the curriculum, especially during the design periods that had notable designers that weren't white cis men. The book itself is well-made, and the quality of the pictures is pretty good. It wasn't a complete waste of time, and worked well for the class I read it for, but I definitely cannot see a hobbyist or a self-taught designer wanting to pick this up.
Everything that Meggs' Meggs' History of Graphic Design wasn't interesting enough to mention. This book is thankfully keener to situate graphic design socially and historically, and provides fresh insights as a result.
Great to revisit the history of design. Really points out the effect Japanese wood cuts had and are still having. Easy to make connections between advancements in technology and their effect on design. I highly reccommend it.