Elisa Gabbert's recent essay in The Paris Review—"On Writerly Jealousy"—made me very glad not to be a nonfiction writer, because Gabbert's essays collected here are exactly the sort that would drive me batty with jealousy. "Reading writers I admire writing about things I want to write about, obsessions I’m protective of, makes me feel unspecial," Gabbert admits there, and while I'm familiar with this sensation with fiction (or more usually, bitterness not just that someone has approached an idea first but has done so little—or worse, something bad—with it), here, I mostly just find the fact that Gabbert's obsessions (translators' notes, front matter, keeping notebooks, fantasizing in the third-person, punctuation, aphorism, &c.) so neatly coincide with my own as to be thrilling.
Sometimes, identification with, or even appreciation of, an essay is mostly limited to realizing that someone else has noticed the same things you have, and perhaps even worded theses shared thoughts nicely, but Gabbert produces not just a recognition of similar feeling but goes on to elaborate on what were merely idle thoughts of mine in far greater detail, and to make me realize why I'd felt a certain way, not just flatter me for having thought it at all. (And, in a number of cases, goes beyond this level and proposes various ideas that I had never thought of before and never would have (even when the subject at hand is one I've contemplated) but are so obviously correct.)
"Honesty" is a word used over much, and typically incorrectly to boot, when describing most types of writing, but these essays actually do feel honest, full of admissions and questions and suspicions and wonderfully emotive hedges, and precise in tracing thought processes in a way such that even digressions don't seem digressive, even in a good way, merely necessary. Certainly, the word is far more applicable to this book than to ones that seem crafted solely to seem "honest" with how overtly personal or revealing they ostensibly are; Gabbert's essays are revealing, but the revelations seem inextricably tied to the crafting of the essays, her personality revealed in her concern with form, structure, technique, and semantics, both explicitly in the text of her essays and implicitly in the delivery of that text.
The details that repeat across essays originally published in various sources speak to the endurance of her obsessions, her patterns of thinking, her modes and manner of thought. Peripheral thoughts and details in one essay move closer to or farther from center-stage in subsequent ones, wonderfully complementing the way that Gabbert blends the presumptive "main" subject of her pieces with tangential thoughts that are just as essential to the whole, and which she paradoxically highlights as if to call attention to them, to not let them be buried in the flow of the rest of her thoughts that the essay is comprised of. Other wonderful ways in which she blurs the boundaries between primary and peripheral include, for example, her mentioning of her marginal notes in books and her valuing of an artwork's title but not the art itself.
In an essay, very relevant to these points, entitled "The Points of Tangency—On digression," she notes that she sometimes, while editing, removes the parentheses from digressions, worried that they imply something lesser about the contents, to readers or editors. But there's nothing lesser about any part of the essays in The Word Pretty. Gabbert's prose style is often delightful and never lacking, but also rarely stellar in a traditional sense, but that only made me realize that I appreciate the strengths of her writing equally, if not more so. Her musings occasionally don't seem entirely novel or valuable, and even more rarely an argument is expressed in a convoluted way, but the overall effect never feels like mere noodling. Rather, it feels like a privilege to get to watch her mind at work, formulating her thoughts around something that matters deeply to her. Which I only now realize is what the best essays ought to do—another thing that I probably always should have known, but Gabbert was able to make seem obvious, as well as the reasons why.