Somewhat like Roberto Bolaño's novels, this is a book about, by, and for literature geeks (for lack of a better term). However, I suspect that (also like Bolaño's novels) it will capture the attention of many readers who don't self-identify that way, on the strength of its compelling cast of characters, well-constructed narrative arc, and revealing intersections with broader historical developments. On the latter front, this a story of the tumultuous history of Spain in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, by way of a family that was a microcosm of its conflicts, contradictions, highs and lows.
The family patriarch, the poet Leopoldo Panero, offers a sort of antiheroic counterpoint to more familiar contemporaries who, like him, were embroiled in the catastrophe of the Spanish Civil War. Unlike his sometime associate Federico García Lorca, who died a martyr to the Republic, Panero shifted his loyalties from the Republic to Franco's Nationalists mid-war, only to become a quasi-official literary figure of the Franco regime after the conflict ended. His political shift, in Shulman's telling, was a complex admixture of sheer expediency (he almost shared Lorca's fate early in the conflict), political and spiritual evolution (his imprisonment and near execution by Franco's forces brought about a religious awakening that aligned him with Francoist Catholicism) and personal loyalty (his brother Juan died fighting for the Nationalists, and his best friend Luis Rosales was a fervent Franco supporter). Felicidad Blanc, the woman Panero married after the war, underwent similar ideological shifts. Raised in a wealthy conservative family, she gradually became a supporter of the Republic as she lived through the long siege of Madrid, only to shift allegiances once again along with her husband in the postwar years (unlike him, she lived past the death of Franco, and shifted again, in a more liberal direction). So, in contrast to the images of literary heroism and commitment we often associate with the Spanish Civil War (Lorca, Hemingway, etc), Panero and Blanc offer complex instances of compromise and ideological vacillation. Despite their affiliation with Franco's regime, they remained friendly with some exiled leftist writers like Luis Cernuda, but Panero eventually found himself on a poetic collision course with his onetime friend Pablo Neruda, who denounced him as a traitor complicit in the deaths of Lorca and others - and to whom he responded with similar vitriol. As Panero becomes increasingly identified with the stodgy establishment of fascist Spain, Felicidad remains a sly, enigmatic observer of the world around her.
Shulman's book is not only the story of the Paneros but the story of the story of the Paneros: that is to say, the story of how they became a legend for generations of Spaniards, and how they came to understand themselves as such, and live accordingly. This process of self-mythification stemmed partly from Leopoldo's and Felicidad's three sons' efforts to grapple with their father's legacy. The eldest two, Juan Luis and Leopoldo María, both follow in their father's footsteps as poets, while the youngest, Michi, is a would-be writer of fiction and memoir whose actual production was scant. We follow the three sons as they confront their father's sudden death at age 52, then observe and take part in the transformation of Spain as the regime their father supported teeters and collapses, and meanwhile live through self-consciously Oedipal drama with their absent father and sometimes all-too-present mother. All of this culminates in the 1976 documentary "El desencanto," which consists of a series of interviews with Felicidad and her sons about Leopoldo Sr's legacy and much more (and which, Shulman explains early on, was the original inspiration for this project). The film, which largely becomes a (again, Oedipally charged) attack on the deceased husband/father, appeared at the moment of Spain's transition to democracy, and resonated with the nation's symbolic need to kill its already dead father (Franco), and its airing of grievances from three plus decades life under fascism.
This is a story, and a book, that folds in on itself, with the latter half a sort of redoubled reflection on the implications of the first half: the sons, and the widowed Felicidad, remain haunted and paralyzed by the past, as represented by Leopoldo Sr. In this, it resembles "Don Quijote" (to whose title character Shulman compares the Paneros more than once). in the second half of Cervantes's novel, Don Quijote finds himself surrounded by people who have read the first half of the novel, and thus see him as a literary character more than a real person (and of course, they're right). The release of "El desencanto" has a similar effect on the younger Paneros, who are now iconic characters in the national imagination - and both embrace and chafe against this fate. (Felicidad, who strongly identified with Emma Bovary as a young woman, seems to have always seen herself in this way.)
All in all, this is an intergenerational literary biography that reveals the impossibility of disentangling literature and life, of separating history from the stories we tell about it.