Okay, my original review was really mean, so I am editing it. Basically, I think that Helen and Betty have a phenomenally codependent relationship. I think that they also spend a lot of time in a certain crossdresser/mtf transsexual scene, like at conferences and workshops and things like that. Both of which are completely fine, right?
But Helen feels comfortable saying lots of things about trans women, and lots of things about their partners, and the things that she says don't ring true at ALL about me or any partners I've got. It's kind of infuriating for her to talk about all the problems that partners of trans women have, when what she means is, people who date someone who comes out to them as trans over the course of a relationship, and then choose to stay in that relationship. (Maybe due to a codependent tendency to prioritize the relationship over the happiness of either of the people in it?)
Look, I tried not to be dating somebody while I sorted out my own coming out and transition. Then, when I accidentally found myself in a relationship, I ended it so that I could transition. I thought, hey, if the straight girl I'm dating pre-transition wants to date me when I'm a lady post-transition, that will be unlikely but nice- but first I am transitioning and getting that sorted.
I hate that there's no consideration that that could ever possibly happen- to Helen Boyd, her experience is everybody's experience, and no, writing an introduction where you say "this is just my experience, don't generalize from it" doesn't get you off the hook for generalizing for the rest of your book.
As for partners, whatever. I'm a trans woman and I'm a lezzie and my partner is a lezzie who's not a trans woman. I met her after transitioning and she does NOT have the same angst about me being trans that Ms Boyd has about her own partner, so whenever Ms Boyd says anything about "partners of trans women," we get invisiblized.
It feels kind of gross for me to write about my partner's experience, though- it's not really my place, you know? It's unlikely but for all I know, she does have all the same angst as Helen Boyd, she just hasn't told me about it.
Which brings us to another problem: here is the premise of the book. "My partner is trans, so let me tell you about trans people, and being partners with them." It doesn't work that way! You suck at talking about my life, Helen, and I am trans.
And finally, like this review, eventually it's just rambly. On and on and on about how gender is a construct and you can't pin it down. I wonder if I'd feel this way re-reading Gender Outlaw? Dunno. But jesus. Brevity! Brevity!