Well, Elly Griffiths, this is starting to be really repetitive.
Ruth is depressed and overweight and she doesn't feel she's a good mother and she loves the depressing saltmarsh where she lives and she likes her job and blah blah. Yes, we get it.
Nelson is a tough working-class northern guy, and blah blah blah. We get that too, we heard it all before (about three times in three other books, in fact) with exactly the same words you used in this book. If you can't find an original way to give information on your characters to potential new readers, maybe you should try something else, like, I don't know, writing something that ISN'T a series of books with the same characters?
Not copying the two diminutive bits of forensic archaeology information straight from wikipedia would help, too. I suppose it may not make a difference to most readers, but having started a biological anthropology course just 3 months before reading this book I had enough knowledge to get infuriated at how superficial Griffith's presentation of forensic archaeology is. I'm not expecting her to get a degree in forensic sciences or anything, but at least get your facts straight and don't simplify things for the sake of a plot twist.
So, although probably no one cares, here's a list of the most annoying things:
- You do NOT establish the sex of a skeleton based on a single characteristic, and you definitely don't do it with one look. You're not good at suspense anyway, you might as well have written that Ruth spent hours squinting at the skeleton like serious professionals do and then came up with the answer.
- An osteoarchaeologist would definitely not have nightmares and be horrified by cut marks on skulls. No, no and no, it just makes Ruth a character that is very difficult to believe in. If you work with human remains you get past that phase really quickly; or you never go through it, I never did. Does it sound heartless? We're interested in bones, we don't think that's morbid, and we certainly don't have nightmares about it. Ending a chapter in "Those heads had been scalped!" didn't make me go "OMGwhatabarbarousthingtodo!", it just made me roll my eyes and put the book down. (Incidentally, you can actually survive being scalped).
- There is no way you get to PhD level without hearing about NAGPRA and the issue of repatriation of human remains belonging to Native American and Australian Aborigine tribes. It's a sensitive issue and a very interesting one, and I heard about it for the first time during the last year of my BA. Again lots of copying and pasting from wikipedia, lots of generalization, and nothing else.
Will I read more books by Elly Griffiths in the future? Only if she doesn't mention forensic techniques ever again, and if Cathbad is there, because Cathbad is cool. Rant over.