It's interesting to go through this book and realize you are reading something so foundational, ideas that went on to shape the world—for better and for worse. I agreed with some of the steps and advice here, especially the idea of finding, defining, and pursuing a purpose. It's also cool to see how his work is the backbone for things like the Law of Attraction and manifestation, and things like the Wheel of Fortune were mentioned, all ideas and concepts that I regularly encounter as a tarot card reader. You would think the leap from early self help that's heavily informed by business practices and capitalism would be a far cry away from tarot and New Age movements, but I guess it's not that much of a gap. (After all, tarot, New Age, and the Law of Attraction are all multimillion dollar industries that also capture people's need for guidance on how to improve their life and get what they want.) I'm also a proponent of entrepreneurialism, and I do believe that someone can acquire knowledge and skills on their own even if they don't have access to formal education. I liked how Hill and the people he interviewed made it seem like their success was entirely accessible and replicable, not something that only people with a trust fund, an angel investor, and no student loans can obtain. I loved the shoutout to libraries as being a place where people can get such an education. (No surprise, Andrew Carnegie was instrumental in helping to found public libraries all across America.)
However, it was a little weird to read some of these interviews with men like Carnegie and realize that some of the virtues that they describe and their approach to business, economics, and managing also are some of the guiding principles of our capitalist society. It's like you step into history and see how these men become "heroes" of industry and influence American today, in the new millennium, when Conservatives and others adopt some of the same hard-ass guidelines. Like, a man should always do more than he is expected, more than he is required, in his job and not expect to get paid for it since he is going "above and beyond" to prove he is worthy of a raise and/or promotion.
No, sorry, that guy should be paid for his time.
Or Carnegie's feeling towards charity, a polite way of saying "no handouts." There you go, there's the root of the gold old American tension between providing social services and a safety net for people in suffering and the opponents who say these people are freeloaders and dead beats sucking the life out of our economy and society.
Then you have to look at people who Hill and his buddies use as examples, like Henry Ford and Walter Chrysler. Sure, they built very successful companies in the automobile industry, but we all know what happened in the last decade, when changing labor patterns precipitated the near-death of the automobile industry and manufacturing mecca in Michigan that Hill loves.
Another example: Hill and his interviewees all think the stock market and Wall Street should be celebrated instead of regulated. They believe that the American government and Constitution are a kind of utopia, operating in a continual harmony where things get done, Congressmen from different parties catch up over lunch, and it's just, aw shucks, just so perfect and perfectly American, the country with no problems that cannot be overcome with a little elbow grease and unpaid overtime and free coffee and danish after church on Sunday.
The problem is, that philosophy is exactly why America today is divided, our government gridlocked by partisan fighting (and infighting), lobbyists, excessive spending, cuts to entitlement and social welfare programs, and people in the Rust Belt Napoleon Hill and his friends praised so much laid waste, unemployed, angry, and wondering how they got cut out of the American dream we are told is our destiny, like it's an article in the Constitution and not actually, well, a dream, which is by definition not a reality, and certainly not a guarantee. These "titans of industry" helped create the forces that would put in play our country's Great Recession, the betrayal of the everyday man by the Wall Street and bankers they endorse.
So while I do appreciate the mindset presented here, and I like the spirit that someone scrappy enough can overcome adversity, I felt dropped down into a film reel reading these interviews and lectures and witnessing the dawn of a new socio-economic-political movement that I don't think has overall helped our country for the better. These men mythologized the currents of capitalism that directly contributed to mass unemployment and a Great Recession as bad as the Great Depression they claimed their philosophies helped overcome.
You can trace a straight line from this kind of hodgepodge glorification of capitalist leaders who have achieved enormous wealth and success -- and the people who believe that if they just think about their goal long enough, they can accomplish the same things. It (rightly) gives people hope while manipulating those dreams to benefit the shareholders.
This was how the American promise was created.
And this is how the American promise failed, which led to a billionaire "outside" candidate winning on a new promise to "Make America Great Again" and blow up Washington.
In that room, I wish I could have turned off the tape recorder, unplugged any cameras recording the event, and put up a sign on the door saying, "Lecture Canceled." I'd rather hear from laborers, unions, the poor, the disabled, the unemployed, women, minorities, and ask them, "What does your power look like to you?"
And: "How can we help you get it?"
Read this for my work as an Instaread Research Editor.