for a little bit in the beginning, i thought i wasn’t going to like this. i couldn’t tell you what it was that made me feel like that, but i’m glad that wasn’t the case. there’s a lot of important information in this book about sex and related things, a really endearing friend group, a sweet as fuck love interest who is my absolute favorite emotional soft boy, a supportive romance that i actually really adore, a kickass mother who is kind of a feminist lorelai gilmore, sex scenes where the characters are laughing and having fun and constantly checking in with each other which shouldn’t be a rarity, an accurate explanation of asexuality, a surprisingly interesting side plot about the main character training to be a doula/midwife, a normalization of sleepovers between girls and guys, a call out of the bullshit idea that there’s a relationship (platonic, romantic, sexual) hierarchy, and a satisfying ending.
content/trigger warnings; ableist language, sex, cisnormative language, birth,
rep; the main character’s best friend, evita, is biromantic asexual. their friend alice is also bi.
i was nervous about how asexuality was going to be explained, because i’ve read (or read about) too many books, especially popular/hyped ya, explaining asexuality as not having a desire for sex and/or having the ace character start the book adamantly not wanting/enjoying sex and ending it having sex solely because it’s what their partner wants. thankfully, sexual attraction is actually mentioned. the difference between asexuality and aromanticism is also mentioned. the asexual character is in love with an allosexual guy who she couldn’t make things work with because she was uncomfortable sex and he wanted to have sex and they could never get on the same page, so they ended things and remain friends. which i think is a refreshing. it’s okay to end things when you can’t figure out to make each person fulfilled in the relationship. compromising and forcing things that aren’t natural or comfortable or wanted for the sake of maintaining a relationship (especially where sex is concerned) is not a healthy narrative that should be expressed to teens.
my one big issue with this book is pretty much the same as my big issues with similar books (moxie and the nowhere girls), it’s not inclusive enough. i don’t mean in the identities of the characters, i mean in the feminism presented in the book. in the two books i mentioned, it’s a case of not addressing how different forms of bigotry intersect when someone is marginalized in more than one way. with this book, it’s a case of the sex/health education presented not offering information specific to different groups of people. we pretty much get “abstinence-only sex ed is detrimental, especially to girls” and that’s it.
that’s not to say the main character and the queer character don’t address how the sex ed class is allo-cis-heteronormative, or that when the main character’s mother is talking about women giving birth she doesn’t stop and acknowledge that not everyone who gives birth identifies as a woman. but aside from those few call outs and acknowledgements, the narrative itself is not inclusive of non-binary and trans people (they’re never even outright mentioned) when, for example, discussing things that affect those with a uterus; it’s a woman thing, then it’s a “hey not everyone who gives birth identifies as a woman” footnote, then it’s back to a woman thing. there was a perfect set up when the love interest makes a joke about how he was brought up around so many women that his cycle syncs up with their’s. the main character’s mother is all “don’t joke about menstruation, because men have used it for centuries to discredit women and their emotions.” but no one mentions how men having a cycle isn’t the funny “haha omg what a silly idea” joke people think it is, because some men do in fact menstruate.
the only forms of sex that are mentioned are penis-in-vagina and oral sex. very briefly, one girl asks about protection during oral sex with her girlfriend, but that’s about as much airtime non-m/f sex specifically gets. queer characters don’t have any dialogue about how certain sex/health narratives affect them specifically as queer people, or what information should be offered to include them in the conversation. the main character mentions a bunch of times that virginity is a social/patriarchal construct and doesn’t equal purity, but that’s never explored or discussed beyond those single comments. no one has a dialogue about the affects the specific “virginity is purity” narrative has had on them and their experiences. the main character also has literally one thought about how the “virginity is purity” narrative affects survivors of sexual abuse, but again, we don’t see any conversations about that specifically. all these things are brought up in a “this class isn’t inclusive to queer kids, this narrative is harmful, this narrative could really harm this one group” way, but never truly talked about through discussions about (or preferably, from) the people being negatively affected, beyond a repeated "abstinence-only narrative made me ashamed of sex and my body and embarrassed to ask questions and learn about safe sex, and that leads to unplanned pregnancies and stis" narrative.
don’t get me wrong, there is a lot of important things talked about in this book in regard to sex, protection, health, consent. (this might be the second book i’ve read that mentions dental dams, and the only one where a character not only talks about peeing after sex to prevent infection, but is actually shown doing so.) but having the characters call out the harmful affects of a non-inclusive, abstinence-only sex/health class, without actually diving completely into those harmful affects for all different kinds of people is ironic. similar to moxie and the nowhere girls, this is a very introductory, surface-level, not-as-intersectional-as-it-should-be take on feminist sex/health education.
other notes:
- the main character is a little annoying/hypocritical/judgmental sometimes. she’s outraged that pregnant teens would feel so ashamed and embarrassed and unsupported that they drop out of school, but her instinctual response to being asked if she’s pregnant is a defensive “no!” it’s as if she supports pregnant teens, but doesn’t want people to think she’s one of them. she gets embarrassed whenever her mother talks feminism around her friends, which is weird considering she does the same thing. she never lets us forget that she’s never been kissed. she gets all “how do they not know this?!” about girls who ask her things about sex/health, which i find extremely horrible. she’s supposed to be a safe, reliable source of support and information for people who have been shamed into silence and ignorance. yet, she doesn’t seem to grasp that it’s not their fault for not knowing, because not everyone has family who talks to them about that stuff, or a school that teaches them about that stuff, and that not everything you read online is factual.
- the main character’s mother is sometimes lowkey portrayed as an annoying feminist who can’t take a joke or is always “on.” when she’s watching tv, she’ll call out this or that, and she corrects people when they say something unfeminist, and i find that extremely relatable. it’s shitty that it’s portrayed as something annoying or negative. the things she says and they way she reacts to things is pretty much the same way i do. i’m no stranger to ranting about sexist comments on tv shows or giving mini lectures when someone says something well-meaning, but ignorant.
- a 17 year old having a maybe possible hook up with a 20 year old is never addressed, aside from the 17 year old making a nonplussed comment about how the guy was probably too old for her. that’s another aspect to sex ed that should be addressed; age. generally, no one of college age needs to be getting involved in with someone in high school.
- along with a lack of discussion about age regarding sex/consent, i feel like explicitly talking about how much/little and when/if people have sex should be addressed as a personal choices that are okay and shouldn’t be judged. if someone has a little, lots, or no sex, valid. if someone has sex before or only after marriage, valid. if someone has sex in high school or after high school/college, valid. it’s a similar message to the main character saying that people shouldn’t be ashamed to talk about their sex lives, but that not wanting to share those details with people is a personal choice that is okay and should be respected.
- the main character’s best friend kept telling her that she “should practice what she preaches” because she’s a virgin giving out sex information. yes, the main character does in fact want to have sex. but this pushy friend trope, along with the idea that one can’t be informed/inform others about sex unless they have it, is just not it.
- the love interest saying building fires and camping are the only manly things he does and it not being corrected to “stereotypically manly” because i guess you can address all kinds of anti-feminist things, but addressing gender roles and toxic masculinity isn’t one of them.