I think it proves that an author has no ethical values, moral compass, etc. to use children as food, torture children as drama-fuel for the "readers"...
I hate the fact that this author dawdles, beats around the bush, delays the "action" in the story "complementing" information that is not needed, not relevant, especially when Ray had to enter the Kidnapper's cave, when Hugo had to fight with the Ox beast-man, etc.
The author changes the first person point of view at the drop of a hat without any warning. Sometimes it's the point of view of allies, sometimes of the antagonist but it's hard to figure out who the heck is "thinking or talking" if they are doing it in the first person that is usually "reserved" for Ray, the main character of the story. On the changes of point of view that the author does not say who is "talking/thinking/doing"...
Nemesis mouth-feeds a potion to Ray, while he is unconscious...while Ray is unconscious, Nemesis, Ray's Embryo, accesses Ray's "inventory space" and takes out the potion, so the thing is, how can an embryo access somebody's personal inventory?, if Ray is "unconscious", isn't Nemesis, Ray's Embryo, not "allowed to present herself in the game? How can she be "active in game" if her "player/master" is unconscious"? Do the game rules, and game system, not apply to the "changes of the rules" that the author writes? Does the author not need to follow the rules, he himself created?
The author is extremely prejudiced against Ray, the main character, gives Rook better loot, higher luck and and easier path to level up, gives "enemies" like Hugo stronger "embryo" (NPC - Non-player character artifact-partner that strengthens the players) in this VRMMORPG...
Are NPC (Tian) children Bits? Real? Should crimes done to them be considered real? Do Universal Human Rights cover Artificial Intelligence and NPC's (Tians) that are only real in Virtual/alternate reality worlds? Do fictional characters created by "authors" die, get sexually assaulted, physically tortured, assassinated, murdered, etc. for real or because it's fiction, even in those fictional stories nothing "real" gets done to anyone? Do real laws, real rules, apply in fictional stories? Are authors delusional if they do not apply "reality" to their fictional stories? Are consequences for actions (law of cause and effect) not applicable in a fictional story?
To prove a point, Bro-Bear, Ray's real brother, "saved" Ray and a girl from a truck accident and "injured" his leg in part of a description of a memory that the author wrote for this story. With that same broken leg (his right leg), Bro-Bear, hit and made unconscious, his "taller and stronger" Russian adversary in the championship fight...not as part of the VRMMORPG, but part of the "real lives" of the Starling brothers in the fictional story. Is it possible to strike and defeat another adversary with a "broken leg kick"? Something similar, happens in the Rocky (boxer series of movies), Sylvester Stallone, plays Rocky a Boxer fighter, that usually was an "underdog" and at the end of most of his movies, wins "unwinnable boxing fights" with faster-stronger-taller-boxer-opponents, so the question is, does "rooting for the underdog" make these "fictional stories" more credible/believable? If they contradict all common sense, and most of the natural laws (physics), then are the authors "delusional or irrational" for writing things that are impossible even in "fictional stories"? Are fictional stories "better or worse" if they lack rationality, common sense or credibility?