As a quantum physicist with a tarot set on my desk, I'm probably the ideal target audience for this most curious book. I do find myself wondering who else would appreciate it though; I found lots of the science explanations to be very vague and fluffy and (I speculate) hence difficult for a layperson to follow or appreciate, as the mechanisms described sometimes bear little connection to the conclusion drawn and I was forced to wrack my brains for memories of bygone lectures to fit the pieces together. Some notions like spin don't seem to be introduced at all, before being casually mentioned a few times. Of course, for someone with a background in physics, rather than there being insufficient explanation, there was sometimes too much, hence my sense of confusion about whom this book is aimed at.
I also raised my eyebrows at some of the descriptions of contemporary scientists (Aharonov: speech-impediment and champion of retrocausality? Felt like exaggeration to me, from all I've seen and heard of the man himself.) and the idolisation of some of the big names like t'Hooft. A great talent, yes, and certainly worth listening to when he speaks of interpretations of quantum physics for his arguments, but not worth listening to just because of his name.
But perhaps this is just an example of extreme meta-cleverness: 'On Subtlety', indeed. After-all, Brooks draws attention to a previous biographer of Cardano disposed to exaggeration...
And also, the book never purports to be a scholarly reference book. In fact, unaware as I was of Cardano and having received the book as a gift, as I embarked on reading it, I didn't know if it was fact or fiction, and could easily have believed Cardano to be fictitious. So I appreciated this introduction to such a seminal, fascinating figure. As a biography, this is more successful than as a primer on interpretations of quantum physics.
The writing style made this easy to read -- a fine example of why a "tell, not show" narrative is perfectly good way to write a story -- and transported me to renaissance Italy, reminding me somewhat of the Stravaganza novels I'd read when younger. Equally as riveting a story.
So an odd book, and not without its flaws (in the big picture, but also in my hardback copy, some typographic problems too), but one I'm nevertheless glad I'm read, and would certainly recommend to the right audience.
I'm just not sure who that it ;)