In contrast with most histories of this period, America's Uncivil The Sixties Era from Elvis to the Fall of Richard Nixon does not treat the 1960s as a single historical moment or as successive waves of activism. Rather, it employs a chronological narrative to identify three distinct phases during which events of the era unfolded. The first began with the cultural ferment of the 1950s and ended with the assassination of John F. Kennedy. During the second phase, from 1964-1968, the "uncivil" wars began in Americans disagreed about new social and cultural mores, protests against the Vietnam War increased in size and vehemence, and American cities erupted in racial violence. From 1967 through 1968, all of these forces combined to divide Americans more deeply than they had been since the Civil War. In the third phase, Richard Nixon promised to bring Americans together. However, a host of new value and identity movements--environmentalists, consumer advocates, feminists, gay, Latino, and Native American activists--frustrated his design. Only after the Watergate scandals forced this polarizing figure from office did a measure of civility return to the nation's public discourse. America's Uncivil Wars captures the broad sweep of this tumultuous era, analyzing both the cultural and political influences on the movements of the 1960s. Paying particular attention to Latinos, Native Americans, feminism, and gay liberation, it integrates the politics of gender and race into the central political narrative. The book also covers such topics as McCarthyism; the FBI; rock and roll; teen culture in the 1950s; the origins of SDS, SNCC, and YAF; and the environmental and consumer movements. With its engaging narrative style and broad cultural emphasis, America's Uncivil Wars brings a fresh approach to our understanding of not only the 1960s but also U.S. history since 1945.
Lytle who was awarded a PhD from Yale University, is Professor of History and Environmental Studies and Chair of the American Studies Program at Bard College. He is also Director of the Master of Arts in Teaching Program at Bard. His publications include The Origins of the Iranian-American Alliance, 1941-1953 and After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection (with James West Davidson) and, most recently, "An Environmental Approach to American Diplomatic History" in Diplomatic History. He is at work on the Uncivil War: America in the Vietnam Era.
Simply excellent. This is a work of synthesis. As such, Hamilton does a superb job incorporating the best and latest historical scholarship into a flowing narrative.
As a side note, I saw Hamilton on CSPAN's BookTV last year giving a talk about this book. Definitely worth checking out.
This is an incredibly thoughtful, nuanced, and digestible overview of the biggest turning point in the history of modern America. It perfectly tees up the decades to come and gives insight into the rise of conservatism and culture wars, as a reaction to the rebellion and progressivism of the 60s. The research and time put into this give a very neutral and matter of fact tone throughout, leaving the reader with the job of connecting the dots and creating their own lineage in their head while reading. History books and the time and effort they take fascinate me, and this is a perfect example of one that lets the individual years of the decade breathe and take the time they need to be explained. Every person of power has had their own legacy to look after, and the presidents of this decade, the legions of cronies that enabled them, and the populous that empowered them are all enthralling to learn about.
Over-all, this is not a bad summary of the "sixties", which covers 20 years in the author's analysis. I like the idea that the period is not defined by an arbitrary decade, but rather a much more sweeping view of the period after the Second World War.
The first part of the title is "America", and this book is relentlessly on the USA, which is fine; the author does not try to pretend it is about world politics. On the other hand, I think that a little international context would have been quite helpful. All of the social movements in this book seem to trace back to American roots, but is it possible that the phenomena were more broadly based? The Civil Rights Movement was definitely American, but was the "counterculture", characterized as it was by hair, clothing styles, music, and so on? Were the events of 1968 in Paris completely divorced from events in the USA, and vice versa?
Well, you won't find out from this book. So, I am complaining because it is not longer and more complicated, which is a personal choice on my part. I can live with that.
Something that really does bug me, though, is that the book was badly, badly edited. I found many examples of words spelled incorrectly ("in tact" instead of "intact", "lead" used in a number of cases where "led" should have been, names of people, and other examples), subject-verb disagreement, misplaced punctuation, and sentence fragments. The author is clearly capable of writing without these errors, but their presence suggests sloppiness. Which makes me wonder about sloppiness in his research. For that, I have deducted 1 star!
Due to a hectic life style, I've been at this book for a week, which seems a long time for me. Consequently I have been reading in short bite size chunks. 'America's Uncivil Wars' has a very broad canvas. In three parts, this sociological expose of the 60's runs from 1954-63 in Part One, 1964-68 in Part Two and 1969-74 in Part Three. In short, Mark Hamilton Lytle provides a narrative that covers the Eisenhower years to the fall of Nixon. Published in 2006, this is a well written analysis of the tumultuous decade that I grew up in. Mr Lytle is Professor of History and Director of the Historical Studies Program and Codirector of the American Studies Program at Bard College. He writes, "A person did not simply live in the sixties. The events of the decade were so tumultuous, intrusive, and overwhelming that each person had to decide at some level-whether to be on or off the bus-to use novelist Ken Kesey's metaphor for a new consciousness. That gave to those who embraced the movements of the era a sense of membership, and hence to those who did not, a sense of exclusion. By listening to Dylan, smoking dope, marching for civil rights, wearing long hair, and protesting against the war in Vietnam, anyone could claim to have joined, though what they belonged to was far from clear. Conversely, those who didn't inhale or protest or drop out were not in the club." Being a fully paid up member of the U.K. branch of the 'club', this portrait of the American experience of this era has been very interesting reading as I only caught up with things on this side of the pond at the time of the 'Woodstock Nation', with the English version at the Isle of Weight in August '69. My only criticism of a Professor of History is the shallow and false recital of the lone nut fairy tales that continue to mask historical truths. It was a coup d'etat Mr Lytle. Hence three stars.