What do you think?
Rate this book


222 pages, Hardcover
First published February 6, 2003
It was, after all, a Victorian English trait to enjoy very un-English Victorian traits, but only at a strategic distance.Over time, my relationship with nonfiction has become increasingly touch and go. It's not a matter of my not knowing what I will be interested in, but that an inordinate pride in my learning curve has had me taking on texts of unknown yet, more often than not, heightened difficulty since I officially broke with my career in engineering. Sometimes I'll have read or have been taught a number of unofficial requisites, and can grasp most of it right off the bat while figuring the rest of it along the way. Other times I'll have no idea what's going on nine words out of ten and will push through out of sheer stubbornness, although my history with Woolf and Maso and co. has given me enough experience in reading holistically that a 10% understanding average usually results in a 70-80% cumulative understanding (don't ask me how that happens, there's a reason why Proust was considered a neuroscientiest). Of course it's difficult with nonfiction, but when it comes to history, there's a normative backbone that most everyone inclined towards academia has been made to swallow. The structure does more harm than good, but if you're willing to go out on its many limbs that it likes to pretend don't exist, you'll get somewhere interesting.
"Seacole, therefore, cleverly weaves Nightingale into her text, creating a mirror image that in many ways subverts Nightingale and allows Seacole, if not to displace Nightingale (whose career in England reverberates beyond the Crimean War), at least to share her Crimean space."""A Colored Woman in Another Country Pleading for Justice in Her Own": Ida B. Wells in Great Britain" - Nicole King - Wonderful article, this time incorporating material from a book that I have not yet read but do own. I must get to Crusade for Justice: The Autobiography of Ida B. Wells by the end of the year. She can use all the love and movie treatments.
"Under the much-studied ambiguities of Lord Mansfield's judgment in 1772, black[ people] in England could still be slaves, but if they asserted their liberty, not always the most attractive proposition, their masters' power of search and seizure were severely limited under the law. Slavery in England was not abolished in 1772 but rather, through the resistance of black residents, disappeared as a legal and social category by the 1790s."I don't think I've ever read through something like this before. The essays built off of each other very nicely, so my hasty oversight of what the construction of this work was resulted in a welcome surprise rather than regret. I was also more engaged in comparing and contrasting the writers' different styles and analytical approaches to their material than I thought I'd be, which is good considering that sort of thing sounds like prime grad school activity. All in all, this is a very niche subject that has been expanded along myriad theoretical paradigms, so if you want to dive in, be prepared to peruse the end notes and tie things together at a constant rate. Payoff includes being able to laugh and laugh and laugh at people who try to say there were no black people in Victorian England, followed by punting the book straight at their "racial instinctive" head.