I (both my adult reading self and equally and perhaps even more so my so-called inner child), we both absolutely and totally love love love Roger Duvoisin's artwork for his picture book Donkey-donkey (which was original penned in 1934 with black and white illustrations and then republished in 1940 with colour pictures). For yes, Duvoisin's artwork for Donkey-donkey, it is brightly expressive, full of marvellous visual depth and I (or rather we) visually adore as well as appreciate how all of the featured domestic animals in Donkey-donkey (the main protagonist, the donkey of course, a horse, a dog, a sheep, a goat, a cow and a pig) as well as the farmer, his brother, the doctor and the father/daughter pair who finally encourage Donkey-donkey regarding his ears and his physical appearance are illustratively rendered by Duvoisin with delightfully visually personable and slyly humorous facial features (and that yes, if I were to only be rating Donkey-donkey for the illustrations and solely for this, my rating would definitely be solidly five stars).
However, albeit Roger Duvoisin's pictures for Donkey-donkey are thus and in my humble opinion absolutely and all-round wonderful, are totally aesthetically marvellous and magical, sorry, but what Duvoisin actually writes content-wise in Donkey-donkey, this kind of makes my above mentioned adult reading self feel more than a trifle uncomfortable (but to be totally, to be perfectly honest, not actually, not in fact my inner child who really adores everything about Donkey-donkey and would have hugely treasured Donkey-donkey not just illustratively but also textually when she was young, when she was five, six and seven years of age).
But for me as an adult, well, since many people (including children) tend to have self esteem issues regarding their physical appearances (and are also often teased and ridiculed due to this and like is repeatedly the case for our burro protagonist in Donkey-donkey), it is in my opinion pretty unfortunate that the way Duvoisin textually deals with Donkey-donkey's insecurities regarding his long ears is to for one to make him try many non donkey-like ways of wearing his ears (with painfully ridiculous results) and for two and sadly that the only reason Donkey-donkey in fact ends happily is because the little girl passing by loudly exclaims that Donkey-donkey's ears look pretty and have the perfect length (for a donkey that is). So yes and indeed, while it is of course nicely positive and optimistic that Donkey-donkey ends happily for the main protagonist, in my opinion, Donkey-donkey does not actually learn to love himself and to appreciate the size of his ears by himself and for himself, no, he is shown by Roger Duvoisin as only actually being happy with his physical appearance once someone else, once the little girl likes how Donkey-donkey's ears look and tells him so.
Thus Donkey-donkey is textually speaking a bit of a let-down for older and more critical me, is boosting self esteem by proxy so to speak, by someone else, which kind of presents a bit of a potentially problematic message that (at least in my humble opinion) should perhaps be discussed if or when Donkey-donkey is to be shared with or read to younger children. But indeed, but yes, although for me as an adult, the combination of Duvoisin's text and his images rate three stars and is narrationally speaking a trifle iffy, I will (since for my inner child Donkey-donkey rates with five stars and is both textually and illustratively totally lovely and also absolutely and utterly unproblematic with regard to Roger Duvoisin's story) be rating Donkey-donkey with four stars (and to also be recommending Donkey-Donkey but of course with some reservations regarding the textual messages presented and implied with and by Duvoisin's printed words).