Is it well written? It's a Danielle Steel book, Of course it's not well written and it's kinda offensive, However I think Danielle was trying to do something different, write something different, The beginning of the book is overwhelming, with an excessive introduction of numerous characters in a short span of pages, making it challenging to keep track of everyone. Furthermore, Steel delves too deeply into the lives of irrelevant faculty members and introduces unnecessary side plots involving the parents, which detract from the main storyline and disrupt the flow of the narrative.
was it compelling?
The storytelling in Moral Compass lacks emotional depth. Instead of showing the readers the events and allowing them to experience the story firsthand, Steel resorts to telling everything in a blunt and straightforward manner. This approach leaves little room for the readers to connect with the characters and their experiences.
One of the most glaring issues in Moral Compass is the unnecessary and forced romance that is thrown into the story. This addition feels out of place and does not contribute to the overall plot or character development.
The way the school and its faculty handle the aftermath of the rape is deeply troubling. Instead of focusing on the rapist and holding him accountable, there is a sense of blame placed on the victim. The teachers, including the female ones, seem more concerned about the potential negative press for the school rather than the trauma the victim has endured. This victim-blaming mentality is evident in lines such as "Some of them would never recover, especially whichever one had raped her..." and "thinking that the boy who had raped her was going to miss out on college forever." These statements imply a misplaced sympathy for the rapist and a lack of empathy for the victim.
The book's lack of a moral compass is evident in the portrayal of the parents. While it is acceptable to have flawed characters, the book often excuses their despicable behavior. For instance, a father who attempts to bribe the victim's family to protect his son from charges is later portrayed as "not a bad guy." This inconsistency undermines the moral message the book tries to convey.
Additionally, the character of Tommy Yee, a Chinese-American student, is portrayed in a stereotypical and racist manner. This portrayal is disappointing and perpetuates harmful stereotypes.
Lastly, there is a disturbing scene where a teacher objectifies a 17-year-old student and comments on her legs. The fact that this behavior is not condemned and is even laughed off by a female teacher is deeply troubling.
Moral Compass by Danielle Steel falls short in several aspects. The lack of focus on the victim, the telling instead of showing approach to storytelling, the overwhelming introduction of irrelevant characters and side plots, the unnecessary romance, the victim-blaming mentality, the excusing of despicable behavior by parents, the racist portrayal of a character, and the disturbing scene of objectification all contribute to a disappointing and upsetting reading experience. The book's title, Moral Compass, is ironic as it seems to lack a true moral compass in its storytelling and character development.
Was it worth reading/ listening to?
No, It's a mess.